Determination Letter 201519033 Released May 8, 2015 Denied Transcribed from scan

Low-income housing trust denied exemption for inadequate records

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A charitable trust owned a 200-unit apartment complex donated by an LLC owned by its married founders and trustees, subject to a substantial loan and other liabilities. Although the trust proposed low-income housing, it did not document the current tenants’ income, provide an appraisal or transfer records showing that the founders did not receive a private benefit, or explain how recreational Christmas activities on the trustees’ property furthered an exempt purpose. The IRS concluded that the incomplete administrative record prevented the trust from proving exclusively charitable operations or the absence of private benefit. Exemption under section 501(c)(3) was denied, and the determination became final when the trust did not protest.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the trust establish that its housing, property transfer, and other activities were exclusively charitable and did not benefit its founders?
  • Outcome: Denied
  • Key authorities: IRC § 501(c)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.501(a)-1 and 1.501(c)(3)-1; Rev. Rul. 70-585; Rev. Rul. 76-441; Rev. Proc. 96-32, 1996-1 C.B. 717; Rev. Proc. 2014-9; Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. United States, 326 U.S. 279 (1945); New Dynamics Foundation v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 782 (2006)

Full text (IRS public release)

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service

P.O. Box 2508
IRS Cincinnati, OH 45201

Date: 2/11/2015

Employer ID number:
Release Number: 201519033

Release Date: 5/8/2015 Contact person/ID number:
UIL Coe: 501.03-30

501.32-00

501.33-00 Contact telephone number:

Form you must file:

Tax years:

Dear

This letter is our final determination that you don’t qualify for tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code (the Code). Recently, we sent you a proposed adverse determination in response to your
application. The proposed adverse determination explained the facts, law, and basis for our conclusion, and it
gave you 30 days to file a protest. Because we didn’t receive a protest within the required 30 days, the proposed
determination is now final.

Because you don’t qualify as a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code, donors can’t
deduct contributions to you under Section 170 of the Code. You must file federal income tax returns for the tax
years listed at the top of this letter using the required form (also listed at the top of this letter) within 30 days of
this letter unless you request an extension of time to file.

We'll make this final adverse determination letter and the proposed adverse determination letter available for
public inspection (as required under Section 6110 of the Code) after deleting certain identifying information.
Please read the enclosed Notice 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose, and review the two attached letters that
show our proposed deletions. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, follow the instructions in the Notice
437 on how to notify us. If you agree with our deletions, you don’t need to take any further action.

We’ll also notify the appropriate state officials of our determination by sending them a copy of this final letter
and the proposed determination letter (under Section 6104(c) of the Code). You should contact your state
officials if you have questions about how this determination will affect your state responsibilities and
requirements.

Letter 4038 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47632S

If you have questions about this letter, you can contact the person listed at the top of this letter. If you have
questions about your federal income tax status and responsibilities, call our customer service number at
1-800-829-1040 (TTY 1-800-829-4933 for deaf or hard of hearing) or customer service for businesses at
1-800-829-4933.

Sincerely,

Tamera Ripperda
Director, Exempt Organizations

Enclosures:

Notice 437

Redacted Letter 4036, Proposed Adverse Determination Under IRC Section 501 (c)(3)
Redacted Letter 4038, Final Adverse Determination Under IRC Section 501(c)(3) - No Protest

Letter 4038 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47632S

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Date: Contact Person:
Identification Number:
Contact Number:
FAX Number:

Employer Identification Number:

LEGEND: UIL:

M= 501.03-30
N= 501.32-00
O= 501.33-00
P=

Q=

$r =

$t =

$x =

Dear

We considered your application for recognition of exemption from federal income tax under
Section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). Based on the information provided, we
determined that you don’t qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. This letter
explains the basis for our conclusion. Please keep it for your records.

Issues

Do you qualify for exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Code? No, for the reasons
described below.

Does your inability to adequately establish operations as exclusively charitable preclude you
from exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Code? Yes, for the reasons described below.

Letter 4036(CG) (11-2011)
Catalog Number 47630W

Facts

You were created as a charitable trust that was funded on P. The trust document states that
you were organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes and your primary
purposes consist of providing low-income housing, preserving holiday traditions, providing
volunteer support for charitable community events, environmental protection, and land
preservation.

Your founders, who also serve as your trustees, are husband and wife. They do not receive
compensation from you.

Your primary activity will be the operation of a two hundred unit apartment complex for low
income housing. You will not participate in government housing programs but will follow HUD
Guidelines to determine the low-income housing income limits and maximum rents that may be
charged.

You own M, a 200 unit apartment complex in N where your low income housing activities will
take place. The building was donated to you by O, a limited liability company owned by your
trustees. The building has an estimated gross value of $t. There is a $r loan on the building
that you assumed along with other associated liabilities such as utilities, insurance, and property
maintenance. You declined to provide a certified appraisal for the value of the apartment
building at the time of transfer due to cost. You did not provide any documentation on the value
of the building or on its transfer. Your other estimated operating expenses to be $x. That
amount includes maintenance, repairs, and supplies, general property expenses, payroll
expenses, general turnover costs such as renovation, cleaning, and repairs, utilities, advertising,
taxes, insurance, and administrative expenses.

You stated that it is illegal to break a lease, so you will honor the existing lease contracts that

were in place at the time the building was transferred. Once those units vacate, you will place
qualified tenants in the units. You did not provide any detail on the number of residents of the
apartment building who are currently low income tenants.

Your other activities include:

• Helping families identify and cope with apraxia,

• Acquiring land for the development of affordable housing,
• Coordinating exempt activities with the community activities of Q, and
• Conducting Christmas activities to keep the Christmas spirit alive.

Your Christmas activities are held on private property owned by your trustees that includes a
living Christmas tree farm with a 100 foot Santa balloon. The trustees will not charge you for use
of the property to promote the Christmas spirit. You will coordinate with local vendors to provide
Christmas activities that will include a train ride through a Christmas tree farm, arts and crafts
workshops, apple cider and hot chocolate, pony rides, and petting zoos. A small fee will be
charged to the public by each of the participating vendors for the activities with prices ranging
from $ to$ . There is no obligation that visitors purchase any goods or services to enjoy the
festivities and holiday lights.

Law

Letter 4036(CG) (11-2011)
Catalog Number 47630W

Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code provides for the exemption from federal income
tax of organizations organized and operated exclusively for charitable, educational, scientific, or
other specified exempt purposes, no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of
any private shareholder or individual.

Section 1.501(a)-1(b)(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, generally, that an
organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Code shall submit a detailed statement of its
proposed activities as part of its application for exemption.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that in order for an
organization to be exempt under section 501(c)(3), an organization must be both organized and
operated exclusively for one or more of the purposes specified in such section. If an
organization fails to meet either the organizational or operational test, it is not exempt.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an organization will be
regarded as "operated exclusively” for one or more exempt purposes only if it engages primarily
in activities which accomplish one or more of such exempt purposes specified in section
501(c)(3) of the Code. An organization will not be so regarded if more than an insubstantial part
of its activities is not in furtherance of an exempt purpose.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an organization is not
operated exclusively for one or more exempt purposes if its net earnings inure in whole or in
part to the benefit of private shareholders or individuals. Section 1.501(a)-1(c) defines the
words "private shareholder or individual" in Code section 501 as referring to persons having a
personal and private interest in the activities of the organization.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an organization is
not organized or operated exclusively for one or more exempt purposes under Code section
501(c)(3) unless it serves a public rather a private interest. Thus, it is necessary for an
organization to establish that it is not organized or operated for the benefit of private interests
such as designated individuals, the creator or his family, shareholders of the organization, or
persons controlled, directly or indirectly, by such private interests.

Revenue Ruling 70-585 held that an organization providing housing to low-income families is
exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Code.

Revenue Ruling 76-441 described two situations in which a for-profit entity was converted to a
non-profit entity. In situation 1 the organization was granted exemption because it established
the conversion from for-profit to non-profit served a public and not a private interest. In situation
2 the organization was denied exemption because the founders benefitted from the transfer of
the property to the non-profit entity because the non-profit entity assumed the liabilities of the
for-profit entity.

Revenue Procedure 96-32, 1996-1 C.B. 717, sets forth a safe harbor under which organizations
that provide low-income housing will be considered charitable as described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code because they relieve the poor and distressed. The revenue

Letter 4036(CG) (11-2011)
Catalog Number 47630W

4

procedure also describes the facts and circumstances test that will apply to determine whether
organizations that fall outside the safe harbor relieve the poor and distressed. An organization
must establish that at least (a) 75 percent of its units are occupied by low-income families, and
(b) either 20 percent of the units are also occupied by very low-income residents or 40 percent
of the units are occupied by residents whose incomes do not exceed 120 percent of the area's
very low income limit. In addition, the housing is affordable to beneficiaries. In the case of rental
housing, this requirement will ordinarily be satisfied by the adoption of a rental policy that
complies with government-imposed rental restrictions or otherwise provides for the limitation of
the tenant's portion of the rent charged to ensure that the housing is affordable to low-income
and very low-income residents. The organization may not further the private interests of
individuals with a financial stake in the project resulting from real property sales, development
fees or management contracts.

Section 4.03 of Revenue Procedure 2014-9, provides, in part, as follows:

Exempt status will be recognized in advance of operations if proposed operations can be
described in sufficient detail to permit a conclusion that the organization will clearly meet the
particular requirements of the section under which exemption is claimed. (1) A mere
restatement of purposes will not satisfy this requirement. (2) The organization must fully
describe the activities in which it expects to engage, including the standards, criteria,
procedures, or other means adopted or planned for carrying out the activities, the anticipated
sources of receipts, and the nature of contemplated expenditures. (3) Where the organization
cannot demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Service that it qualifies for exemption pursuant to
the Section of the Internal Revenue Code under which exemption is claimed, the Service will
generally issue a proposed adverse determination letter or ruling.

In Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. United States, 326 U. S. 279 (1945), the
Court held that the presence of a single non-exempt purpose, if substantial in nature, will
destroy a claim for exemption regardless of the number or importance of truly exempt purpose.

In Kenner vs. Commissioner, 318 F.2d 632 (7th Cir. 1963), and Cleveland Chiropractic

Practical College vs. Commissioner, 312 F. 2d 203, 206 (8th Cir. 1963) the conditional language
of section 501(c)(3) of the Code and the burden of proof placed upon the taxpayer is
considered. In general, an organization that applies for recognition of exemption has the burden
of proving that it clearly meets all the requirements of the particular section of the Code under
which it has applied. The taxpayer must clearly demonstrate its right to exemption.

New Dynamics Foundation v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 782 (2006), the organization failed to
establish an administrative record that showed it was operated for exclusively exempt purposes.
The court held that exemption from federal income tax is not a right; it is a strictly interpreted
matter of legislative grace and the burden rests with the applicant to prove that it is entitled to
exempt status.

In Founding Church of Scientology v. United States, 412 F.2d 1197, 1200, 1202, 188 Ct. Cl. 490
(Ct.Cl 1969), the organization has the burden of providing sufficient documentation or other
substantive information regarding its activities and operations, which would establish entitlement
to tax exempt status, including establishing that its net earnings will not inure to the benefit of
private individuals and that it will not serve private interests.

Letter 4036(CG) (11-2011)
Catalog Number 47630W

In Mercantile Bank & Trust Company v. United States, 441 F.2d 364 (8th Cir. 1971), the court
stated that “Special benefits to taxpayers, such as tax exemption status, do not turn upon
general equitable considerations but are matters of legislative grace. The taxpayer has the
burden to show that it comes within the statutory provision allowing the deduction or exemption
comes squarely within the terms of the laws conferring the benefit sought.”

In Salvation Navy v. Commissioner, T.C.M. 2002-275 (2002), the Tax Court found that one of
the reasons why the organization did not qualify for exemption from federal income tax was
because it could not prove that it was not organized to serve the private interests of its founder.

Application of Law

Section 501(c)(3) of the Code sets forth two main tests for an organization to be recognized as
exempt. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) of the Regulations provides that in order for an organization
to be exempt under section 501(c)(3), an organization must be both organized and operated
exclusively for one or more of the purposes specified in such section. You have failed the
operational test because you did not provide information to show that you are operated
exclusively for 501(c)(3) purposes.

In order to establish its exemption, an organization must submit a detailed statement of its
proposed activities as a part of its application for exemption. See Section 1.501(a)-1(b)(1)(iii) of
the Regulations. You failed to provide the following items that are material to a determination of
whether you satisfy the standards for exempt status:

• Details to determine if your housing is currently operating as low income and fulfills a
charitable purpose.

• Details and documentation regarding the transfer of property to you that demonstrates
the transaction did not lead to inurement to your trustees.

• Details to determine if your Christmas activities further an exempt purpose
under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code.

The IRS has statutory and regulatory authority to inquire about an applicant's proposed
activities and other subjects material to its determination of whether the applicant meets the
standards for exempt status. Rev. Proc. 2014-9. Accordingly, gaps in the administrative record
may be resolved against you. See Rev. Proc. 2014-9, Section 4.03. Despite our request, you
failed to respond to questions that were material to determining whether you satisfy the
standards for exempt status. Your exemption request is similar to Kenner vs. Commissioner,
and Cleveland Chiropractic Practical College vs. Commissioner, above. Here, the court held
that an organization has the burden of proving that it clearly meets all the requirements of the
particular section of the Code under which it has applied. Your application and response lacked
sufficient information to show that you meet the requirements to be classified as an exempt
organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Like the organization in New Dynamics
Foundation v. United States, you failed to show that you are operated exclusively for exempt
purposes.

Letter 4036(CG) (11-2011)
Catalog Number 47630W

6

Though providing low Income housing may fulfill an exempt purpose under Section 501(c)(3) of
the Code, you have not shown that you engage primarily in activities that accomplish an exempt
purpose. See Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) of the Regulations. You are unlike the organizations
described in Rev. Rul. 70-585. You did not provide information to show that the residents of
your apartment building are low income and meet the guidelines set forth in Rev. Proc. 96-32.
When your apartment building was transferred to you, there were already current tenants
residing in the building. You did not provide information on the income levels of the tenants or
how many units were occupied by low income residents. You only stated that it is illegal to
break a lease so you have to honor the existing lease contracts that were in place at the time
the building was transferred. Once those units vacate, you will place qualified tenants in the
units. As stated above in Mercantile Bank & Trust Company v. United States, the burden of
proof that the requirements for tax exemption are met falls upon you. By failing to provide
information about the current residents of your apartment building, you have not carried your
burden to demonstrate that your activities are exclusively in furtherance of exempt purposes.

You also failed to provide details and documentation regarding the transfer of property to you
that demonstrates the transaction did not lead to inurement to your trustees. Your apartment
building was donated by an LLC controlled by your founders who are also your trustees. The
apartment building has a liability attached to it. You are unlike the organization in Situation 1 of
Rev. Rul. 76-441. Your board is composed of the former owners of the apartment building. In
that respect, you are similar to the organization in Situation 2 of Rev. Rul. 76-441. However, it
is unclear whether the transfer of assets and liabilities was similar to that of Situation 2 since
you declined to provide a qualified appraisal or other documentation on the property so we
could determine if the assets transferred were greater than the liabilities. You only provided a
statement indicating the value of the building and the outstanding loan amount. Charitable
organizations cannot be operated to benefit insiders such as officers or directors. Per Section
1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(2) of the Regulations, an organization is not operated exclusively for one or
more exempt purposes if its net earnings inure in whole or in part to the benefit of private
shareholders or individuals. Like the organizations in Salvation Navy v. Commissioner and
Founding Church of Scientology v. United States, you did not provide information to prove that
you were not organized to serve the private interests of your founders who are also your
trustees.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an organization is
not organized or operated exclusively for one or more exempt purposes under Code section
501(c)(3) unless it serves a public rather a private interest. Thus, it is necessary for an
organization to establish that it is not organized or operated for the benefit of private interests
such as designated individuals, the creator or his family, shareholders of the organization, or
persons controlled, directly or indirectly, by such private interests. By not providing
documentation about the transfer of the apartment building, you did not establish that you are
not operated for the benefit of your trustees.

Per Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) of the Regulations, an organization will be regarded as
“operated exclusively" for one or more exempt purposes only if it engages primarily in activities
which accomplish one or more of such exempt purposes specified in section 501(c)(3) of the
Code. You stated that your Christmas activities include train rides, arts and crafts workshops,
pony rides, and petting zoos. These activities are social and recreational in nature, not

Letter 4036(CG) (11-2011)
Catalog Number 47630W

7

charitable or educational. Like in Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. United
States, your Christmas activities do not fulfill an exempt purpose under section 501(c)(3) of the

Code.
Conclusion

You do not meet the requirements under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code because you failed to
establish your activities are exclusively charitable and that you do not operate for the private
interest of your founders. Accordingly, you do not qualify for exemption as an organization
described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code.

If you don’t agree

You have a right to file a protest if you don’t agree with our proposed adverse determination. To
do so, you must send a statement to us within 30 days of the date of this letter. The statement
must include:

• Your name, address, employer identification number (EIN), and a
daytime phone number

• A copy of this letter highlighting the findings you disagree with

• An explanation of why you disagree, including any supporting
documents

• The law or authority, if any, you are relying on

• The signature of an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to
sign for the organization, or your authorized representative

• One of the following declarations:

For an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the
organization:

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that | examined this protest statement,

including accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief,

the statement contains all relevant facts and such facts are true, correct, and
complete.

For authorized representatives:

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that | prepared this protest statement,
including accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief,
the statement contains all relevant facts and such facts are true, correct, and
complete.

Your representative (attorney, certified public accountant, or other individual enrolled to practice

Letter 4036(CG) (11-2011)
Catalog Number 47630W

8

before the IRS) must file a Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative,
with us if he or she hasn't already done so. You can find more information about representation
in Publication 947, Practice Before the IRS and Power of Attorney.

We'll review your protest statement and decide if you provided a basis for us to reconsider our
determination. If so, we'll continue to process your case considering the information you
provided. If you haven't provided a basis for reconsideration, we'll forward your case to the
Office of Appeals and notify you. You can find more information about the role of the Appeals
Office in Publication 892, How to Appeal an IRS Decision on Tax-Exempt Status.

If you don't file a protest within 30 days, you can’t seek a declaratory judgment in court at a later
date because the law requires that you use the IRS administrative process first (Section
7428(b)(2) of the Code).

Where to send your protest
Please send your protest statement, Form 2848, if needed, and any supporting documents to
the applicable address:

U.S. mail:

Internal Revenue Service
EO Determinations Quality Assurance
Room 7-008
P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201

Street address for delivery service:

Internal Revenue Service
EO Determinations Quality Assurance
550 Main Street, Room 7-008
Cincinnati, OH 45202

You can also fax your statement and supporting documents to the fax number listed at the top
of this letter. If you fax your statement, please contact the person listed at the top of this letter to
confirm that he or she received it.

If you agree

If you agree with our proposed adverse determination, you don’t need to do anything. If we don't
hear from you within 30 days, we'll issue a final adverse determination letter. That letter will
provide information on your income tax filing requirements.

You can find all forms and publications mentioned in this letter on our website at
www.irs.gov/formspubs. If you have questions, you can contact the person listed at the top of
this letter.

Letter 4036(CG) (11-2011)
Catalog Number 47630W

Enclosure:
Publication 892

Sincerely,

Director, Exempt Organizations

Letter 4036(CG) (11-2011)
Catalog Number 47630W

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.