Private Letter Ruling 201519028 Released May 8, 2015 Approved

Farm-use semitrailer body is exempt from retail excise tax

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A manufacturer designed a semitrailer to haul and unload feed, seed, fertilizer, and similar agricultural materials on farms and fields. Its alloy-aluminum construction, sealed lightweight moving floor, bolted frame, sloped seals, corrosion-resistant mounting plates, and specialized axles reduced weight, prevented leaks and corrosion, enabled off-road flexing, and made forklift loading and general freight use impractical. The IRS concluded that the body was primarily designed for the farm functions listed in section 4053(2). Retail sales of the trailer body were therefore exempt from the section 4051(a)(1) excise tax.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Is the specialized agricultural semitrailer body exempt from the retail excise tax under section 4053(2)?
  • Outcome: Approved, retail sales of the described body are exempt.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 4051(a)(1), 4053(2); Rev. Rul. 69-579, 1969-2 C.B. 200; Rev. Rul. 75-462, 1975-2 C.B. 419; Rev. Rul. 2004-80, 2004-2 C.B. 164

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201519028 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/8/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 4051.00-00, 4053.00-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------------- ------------------------, ID No. ------------------
----------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------
-------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------- ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B07
PLR-131923-14
Date:
January 30, 2015

LEGEND:

Taxpayer = --------------------------------------

Trailer = ---------------------------

Material = -------------------------------------------------------

Axles = ----------------------------

Dear -----------------:

This replies to a letter ruling request dated August 22, 2014, submitted on your behalf
by your authorized representative, with regard to whether a certain semitrailer body that
you sell at retail are exempt under § 4053(2) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) from
the tax imposed by § 4051(a)(1).

Taxpayer designs, manufactures, and sells specialty trailers and other solutions for
transportation and material handling. At issue in this case is Taxpayer’s Trailer.

Trailer is specifically designed and built by Taxpayer to haul and unload various
agricultural commodities such as feed, seed, and fertilizer to and on farms and fields.
Trailer is an open-top, rectangular box that incorporates the special design features
discussed below.

Trailer’s design evolved over many years, and currently has the following special
agricultural industry-specific features. First, Trailer is built with alloy aluminum panels
and rails. This feature reduces the overall weight of Trailer in comparison to standard
heavy-duty trailers, which allows Trailer to carry approximately the same volume of
commodities as a heavy-duty trailer without exceeding the hauling capacity of the semi-
PLR-131923-14 2

tractor pulling it. In addition, alloy aluminum resists the corrosive properties of feed,
seed, and fertilizer.

Second, Trailer’s floor features a light-weight ----------------- floor slat constructed out of
Material. This feature further reduces the overall weight of Trailer and provides leak
prevention. The quality of the floor seal allows Trailer to carry feed, seed, and fertilizer
commodities it otherwise could not handle, such as wet distiller grain, modified distiller
grain, dry distiller grain, finely ground feeds, flour, agricultural lime, and poultry litter.
Taxpayer states that the floor design makes Trailer incompatible with forklift loading and
unloading. Therefore, Trailer is not designed to carry palletized cargo; in fact, this
method of loading and unloading cargo will result in significant damage to Trailer.

Third, Trailer is assembled using bolts rather than with welds. This feature allows
Trailer to flex when it is pulled off road onto secondary roads, fields, and farms. Welds
are used to assemble general hauling trailers for use on improved roads, but are not
adequate for long-term use on the types of surfaces Trailer was designed to encounter.

Fourth, Trailer features sloped side seals that facilitate unloading of bulk materials. In
addition, stainless steel mounting plates, rather than aluminum, were added to the
bottom rail of Trailer. These two features help prevent corrosion that would result from
hauling feed, seed, and fertilizer commodities.

Fifth, Trailer uses Axles, rather than the 20,000-pound or 22,500-pound axles that are
found on general hauling trailers that cannot use secondary roads. This feature, along
with the bolted construction described above, allow Trailer to use secondary roadways
and to directly access fields.

Section 4051(a)(1) imposes a tax on the first retail sale of, among other things,
automobile truck bodies and truck trailer and semitrailer bodies.

Section 4053(2) provides that the tax imposed by section 4051 shall not be imposed on
any body primarily designed- (A) to process or prepare seed, feed, or fertilizer for use
on farms, (B) to haul feed, seed, or fertilizer on farms, (C) to spread feed, seed, or
fertilizer on farms, (D) to load or unload feed, seed, or fertilizer on farms, or (E) for any
combination of the foregoing.

Rev. Rul. 69-579, 1969-2 C.B. 200, holds that certain automotive truck bodies equipped
with heavy-duty unloading equipment and used primarily for hauling feed, seed, and
fertilizer to and on farms, are exempt from the manufacturers tax under section
4063(a)(2)(B) (the predecessor to the section 4053(2) exemption provided for retailers
tax purposes).

Rev. Rul. 69-579 describes truck, trailer, and semitrailer bodies that contain heavy-duty
mechanical or pneumatic type unloading equipment specially designed to facilitate
PLR-131923-14 3

unloading on the farm. The unloading equipment is built into, and forms an integral part
of the bodies, adding substantially to their cost and weight, and limiting their load-
carrying capacity. The mechanical system uses conveyors and augers, and unloads
from the top of the body; the pneumatic system uses a blower and hose, and usually
unloads from the bottom and rear of the body. Each system is activated by a power
take-off from the truck engine. The bodies are usually divided into separate
compartments and are either open at the top or completely enclosed.

The revenue ruling states that the elaborate and expensive unloading systems built into
these bodies, and the modifications of the bodies required to accommodate the
unloading systems, make it impracticable to purchase the bodies for use other than in
hauling feed, seed, or fertilizer to, and unloading it on, farms. The revenue ruling
concludes that the bodies are primarily designed to haul and unload feed, seed, or
fertilizer on farms, and are exempt from the manufacturers tax by virtue of the section
4063(a)(2)(B) exemption.

Rev. Rul. 75-462, 1975-2 C.B. 419, provides that highway bodies that are used for the
general hauling of feed, seed, or fertilizer over the highway are subject to the
manufacturers excise tax unless they have specific features that indicate they are
primarily designed to haul feed, seed, or fertilizer to and on farms.

Rev. Rul. 2004-80, 2004-2 C.B. 164, addresses the definition of the term “primarily
designed” as that term is used in distinguishing a truck from a tractor for purposes of
section 4051(a)(1). The revenue ruling states that the term “primarily designed” means
principally designed. It does not mean exclusively designed.

The exemption from tax provided by section 4053(2) does not extend to bodies primarily
designed for general use, even though the bodies may be capable of hauling feed,
seed, and fertilizer to and on farms or performing other functions described in section
4053(2). To be exempt, a body must be primarily designed for one, or a combination of
functions described in section 4053(2).

In requesting tax-exempt treatment for Trailer, Taxpayer submitted a letter ruling
request that was detailed and comprehensive. To complement the extensive factual
discussion, the letter ruling request included engineering schematics, full-color
brochures, as well as a comprehensive legal analysis.

With regard to Trailer, the body contains an unloading system that is built into, and
forms an integral part of, the body. The special unloading system that uses Material is
elaborate, expensive, and adds substantially to the cost of each body. Thus, like the
specially designed bodies described in Rev. Rul. 69-579, purchase of the subject bodies
for use other than in hauling feed, seed, or fertilizer to, and unloading it on, farms, would
be impractical.
PLR-131923-14 4

Further, the detailed information provided by Taxpayer highlights a number of specific
features, including the alloy aluminum panels, the bolted as opposed to welded
construction, the sloped design and self-cleaning nature of the rails at the top of the
trailer, the fabrication of the lower rails to limit corrosion and contamination of the
trailer’s cargo, and the heavy duty Axles that also add to the cost of each body and
indicate Trailer is primarily designed for use on farms.

Accordingly, the semitrailer body described herein as Trailer falls within the exemption
provided by section 4053(2) and Taxpayer's retail sales thereof are exempt from the tax
imposed by section 4051(a)(1).

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   /s/Charles J. Langley, Jr.

                                   Charles J. Langley, Jr.
                                   Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 7
                                   (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.