Private Letter Ruling 201519023 Released May 8, 2015 Approved

Partnership receives late section 754 election relief

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partnership failed to make a section 754 election for a year in which one member purchased part of another member’s interest because its tax advisers did not explain that the election was available. The partnership represented that it acted reasonably and in good faith, was not using hindsight, and would not prejudice the government. The IRS granted 120 days to file the election effective for the transfer year and later years, with basis adjustments calculated as though the election had been timely.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the partnership make a late section 754 election for the transfer year?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 120 days to file the election and attach the ruling.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 734, 743, 754, and 755; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1(b), 1.755-1(c), 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201519023 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/8/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 754.02-00, 9100.15-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------, ID No. ---------------
-------------------------------- ----------------
------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------------------------- --------------------
------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:01
PLR-138694-14
Date:
January 20, 2015

Legend
X = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------
State = ------------
Year = ------
A = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
B = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------

Dear -----------------:

This responds to a letter dated October 14, 2014, and subsequent correspondence
submitted on behalf of X, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations for X to make an election under § 754 of the
Internal Revenue Code.

FACTS

According to the information submitted, X was formed as a limited liability company
under the laws of State and is classified as a partnership for federal tax purposes. The
members of X at the time of formation were A and B. In Year, A purchased a
percentage of B’s interest in X. X relied on its tax advisor when preparing returns for
Year, and the advisors did not inform X as to the availability of an election under § 754.
Therefore, X inadvertently failed to timely file a § 754 election for Year. X represents
that it acted reasonably and in good faith, that granting relief will not prejudice the
interest of the government, and that it is not using hindsight in making this election. X
PLR-138694-14 2

further represents that neither it nor any other parties involved are under audit for the
year in question.

LAW & ANALYSIS

Section 754 provides that if a partnership files an election, in accordance with the
regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the basis of the partnership property is
adjusted, in the case of a transfer of a partnership interest, in the manner provided in
§ 743. Such an election shall apply with respect to all distributions of property by the
partnership and to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year
with respect to which the election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.

Section 1.754-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an election under § 754
to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b) with respect to a
distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a partnership, shall be
made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the taxable year during
which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be valid, the return must be
filed not later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031-1(e) (including extensions therefore)
for filing the return for the taxable year.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable
extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than
6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I . Section 301.9100-1(b) defines
the item “regulatory election” as an election whose due date is prescribed by a
regulation published in the Federal Register or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure,
notice, or announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Section 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will
use to determine whether to grant and extension of time to make the election. Section
301.9100-2 provides the rules governing automatic extensions of time for making
certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards the Commissioner will
use to determine whether to grant an extension of time for regulatory elections that do
not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-3. Under § 301.9100-3, a request for relief will
be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and (2) granting
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

CONCLUSION

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude
that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a
result, X is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to make
an election under § 754 effective for Year and thereafter. The election should be made
PLR-138694-14 3

in a written statement filed with the appropriate service center for association with X’s
Year return. A copy of this letter should be attached to the election.

X must calculate the adjustments under § 734(b) and (c), and § 1.755-1(c), as if X had
timely made the § 754 election and allocated the increase in basis among the properties
held by X at that time. If the statutory period of limitation on assessment or filing a claim
for refund has expired for any year subject to this grant of late relief, then A and B must
reduce their respective basis of their interests in X to reflect any additional basis
adjustments under section 734 that would have been allocated under section 755 to any
properties sold in such years as if the section 754 election had been timely.

Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed concerning the federal
tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Internal
Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. In accordance with the power of
attorney on file with this office, copy of this letter is being sent to X’s authorized
representatives.

                                   Sincerely,


                                   Associate Chief Counsel
                                   (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

                                   Laura C. Fields
                                   Laura C. Fields
                                   Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
                                   Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                   (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.