Private Letter Ruling 201519011 Released May 8, 2015 Approved

Late real-property debt-discharge election receives relief

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Partners received cancellation-of-debt income after a short sale of residential rental property. The partnership preparer did not identify the debt as qualified real property business indebtedness, and the individual return preparer therefore did not advise the partners to make the section 108(c)(3)(C) election. A later adviser discovered the omission. The IRS found reasonable reliance and no prejudice to the government and granted 45 days to amend the return and file Form 982, provided the operating division did not determine that an accuracy-related penalty applied.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayers make a late election to exclude qualified real property business debt-discharge income and reduce basis?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 45 days to file an amended return and Form 982, subject to the stated penalty condition.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 108(a)(1)(D), (c), and (d)(6); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.108-5(b) and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201519011 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/8/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 9100.22-00,
108.01-00 Person To Contact:
-------------------, ID No. ----------------
--------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------ --------------------
------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:4
PLR-132946-14
Date:
January 15, 2015

     TY: ------

Legend

Taxpayers = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Year 1 = ------
Year 2 = ------
Year 3 = ------
Date 1 = --------------------------
Date 2 = -----------------------
Firm 1 = --------------------------------------------------------
Firm 2 = ----------------------------------------------------
Firm 3 = ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bank = -------------------------------------------------
x = ---
Y = --------------------

Dear ----------:

This letter responds to your request for an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations to make an election under § 108(c)(3)(C) of
the Internal Revenue Code. Specifically, you have requested an extension of time to
make an election under § 108(c)(3)(C) of the Code and § 1.108-5(b) of the Income Tax
Regulations, to exclude income resulting from the discharge of qualified real property
business indebtedness and to reduce the basis of depreciable real property, effective
for Taxpayer’s Year 1 federal income tax return.

Facts
Taxpayers use the cash method of accounting and have a calendar year as an annual
accounting period. Taxpayers were a combined x percent owner of Y, which owned a
PLR-132946-14 2

residential rental property that was subject to a short sale in Year 1. After the short sale
and relinquishment of the property, Y ceased operations as of Date 1.

The short sale occurring in Year 1 created cancellation of debt (COD) income to Y, and
the COD income was reported on a Form 1099-C, Cancellation of Debt, issued from
Bank.

In Year 2, Y relied on a tax professional at Firm 1 to prepare Y’s Year 1 Form 1065,
U.S. Return of Partnership Income. However, neither Form 1065 nor the corresponding
Schedule K-1, Partner’s Share of Income, Deductions, Credits, etc., indicated that the
COD related to qualified real property business indebtedness.

Taxpayers relied on a different tax professional at Firm 2 to prepare their Year 1 Form
1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return. Firm 2 was unaware of the nature of the
Taxpayers’ COD income and, thus, failed to advise Taxpayers about the opportunity to
make the election under § 108(c)(3)(C) of the Code and § 1.108-5(b) of the regulations.

Taxpayers timely filed the Year 1 federal income tax return (including the extension) on
Date 2 and set up an Installment Agreement using Form 9465, Installment Agreement
Request. Taxpayers represent that they have been current on all payments since the
time of filing.

In Year 3, a different tax professional at Firm 3 reviewed Taxpayers’ Year 1 Form 1040,
and discovered that Taxpayers could have elected to exclude the COD income.
However, the time allowed for filing the election had expired. Taxpayer and the tax
professionals at Firm 2 and Firm 3 have submitted affidavits consistent with the above
facts.

Taxpayers represent that granting relief under § 301.9100-3 will not result in a lower tax
liability in the aggregate for all years to which the election applies than the taxpayer
would have had if the election had been timely made.

Applicable Law

Section 108(a)(1)(D) provides that gross income does not include any amount that
would be included in gross income by reason of the discharge of indebtedness if, in the
case of a taxpayer other than a C corporation, the indebtedness discharged is qualified
real property indebtedness.

Section 108(c)(1) provides that the amount excluded from gross income is applied to
reduce basis of the depreciable real property of the taxpayer. Section 108(c)(3)(C)
requires a taxpayer to make an election to exclude COD income under § 108(a)(1)(D).
PLR-132946-14 3

Section 108(c)(2)(A) provides that the amount excluded under § 108(a)(1)(D) for any
qualified real property business indebtedness does not exceed the excess (if any) of (i)
the outstanding principal amount of such indebtedness (immediately before the
discharge), over (ii) the fair market value of the real property described in paragraph
(3)(A) (as of such time), reduced by the outstanding principal amount of any other
qualified real property business indebtedness secured by such property (as of such
time).

Section 108(c)(2)(B) provides that the amount excluded under 108(a)(1)(D) does not
exceed the aggregate adjusted bases of depreciable real property (determined after any
reductions under § 108(b) and § 108(g)) held by the taxpayer immediately before the
discharge (other than depreciable real property acquired in contemplation of such
discharge).

Section 108(d)(6) provides that in the case of a partnership, § 108(a) and § 108(c) apply
at the partner level.

Section 1.108-5(b) provides that the election under § 108(c)(3)(C) is made on the
timely-filed (including extensions) Federal income tax return for the taxable year in
which the taxpayer has discharge of indebtedness income that is excluded from gross
income under § 108(a). The election is made on a completed Form 982, Reduction of
Tax Attributes Due to Discharge of Indebtedness (and Section 1082 Basis Adjustment),
in accordance with that Form and its instructions.

Sections 301.9100-1 through § 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a
regulatory election. Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time
for regulatory elections (other than automatic extensions covered in § 301.9100-2) will
be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits) to establish that
the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and granting relief will not prejudice the
interests of the Government.

Under § 301.9100-3(b), a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good
faith if the taxpayer requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is
discovered by the Service, or reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, and the
tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election. A
taxpayer will not be considered to have reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional
if the taxpayer knew or should have known that the professional was not competent to
render advice on the regulatory election or aware of all the relevant facts.

In addition, § 301.9100-3(b)(3) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have not acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer—
PLR-132946-14 4

   (i)     seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related
           penalty has been or could be imposed under § 6662 at the time the
           taxpayer requests relief, and the new position requires or permits a
           regulatory election for which relief is requested;

   (ii)    was fully informed of the required election and related tax
           consequences, but chose not to file the election; or

   (iii)   uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed
           since the original deadline that make the election advantageous to
           a taxpayer, the Service will not ordinarily grant relief.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that the Commissioner will grant a reasonable
extension of time to make the regulatory election only when the interests of the
Government will not be prejudiced by the granting of relief.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides that the interests of the Government are prejudiced
if granting relief would result in a taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate
for all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would have had if the
election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money).

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides that the interests of the Government are ordinarily
prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have been made or
any taxable year that would have been affected by the election had it been timely made
are closed by the period of limitation on assessment under § 6501(a) before the
taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling granting relief under this section.

Based on the information submitted by Taxpayers, we conclude that (1) Taxpayers
acted reasonably and in good faith under § 301.9100-3(b), and (2) the interests of the
Government will not be prejudiced by the granting of relief under § 301.9100-3(c).

Conclusion

Accordingly, based solely on the information submitted and the facts represented in the
ruling request, and provided that the Operating Division Director does not determine
that Taxpayer is subject to an accuracy-related penalty under § 6662, we grant
Taxpayers an extension of 45 days from the date of this letter ruling to file an amended
return to make the election under § 108(c)(3)(C) and § 1.108-5(b). The election is to be
made on Form 982.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon the information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. Although this office has not verified any of the material
PLR-132946-14 5

submitted in support of the request for the ruling, that material is subject to verification
on examination.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. Specifically, this letter does not rule on whether the income at issue is
properly treated as cancellation of indebtedness income under § 61(a)(12). In addition,
except for the relief granted to make a late election, this letter also does not rule on
whether the income in fact qualifies for exclusion from income under any provision of
§ 108 (including § 108(a)(1)(D)).

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Enclosed is a copy of the letter showing the deletions proposed to be made when it is
disclosed under § 6110. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please
contact the individual whose name and telephone number appear at the beginning of
the letter.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, a taxpayer filing a return electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to the return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

                                       Sincerely,



                                       Michael J. Montemurro
                                       Chief, Branch 4
                                       Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                       (Income Tax & Accounting)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.