S corporation receives inadvertent termination relief for disproportionate distributions
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An S corporation made disproportionate distributions to its shareholders because its in-house accountant misunderstood the distribution rules. The corporation later learned that the distributions could be viewed as creating a second class of stock, which could terminate its S election. It made corrective distributions and represented that neither it nor its shareholders intended a termination. The IRS ruled that any resulting termination was inadvertent under IRC § 1362(f), so the corporation would continue to be treated as an S corporation if its election was not otherwise terminated.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: If disproportionate shareholder distributions terminated the corporation's S election, was the termination inadvertent?
- Outcome: Approved. The corporation will continue to be treated as an S corporation, provided its election is not otherwise terminated.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361 and 1362; Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-1
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201519008 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/8/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00, 1362.02-03
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------------- ----------------, ID No. ------------------
------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------- ----------------------
------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B01
PLR-130818-14
Date:
December 19, 2014
LEGEND
X = -------------
Date 1 = -------------------
Date 2 = ------------------------
Date 3 = -------------------
Period = -------------------------------------------------------------
State = -------------
Dear ----------------:
This responds to a letter signed July 18, 2014, submitted on behalf of X by X’s
authorized representative, requesting relief under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue
Code (the Code).
FACTS
According to the information submitted and representations within, X was incorporated
on Date 1, under the laws of State. Effective Date 1, X elected to be taxed as an S
corporation.
For Period, X made disproportionate distributions to its shareholders. On Date 2, X
learned that the distributions it made for Period were not consistent with its governing
instruments and could be construed as creating a second class of stock, and, thus,
+PLR-130818-14 2
could potentially have terminated its S corporation election effective the beginning of
Period.
X represents that it made disproportionate distributions to its shareholders due to a
misunderstanding of the distributions rules by their in-house accountant. Neither X nor
its shareholders knew that disproportionate distributions could potentially terminate X’s
S corporation election. X represents that it relied upon the advice of their in-house
accountant.
X represents that it has taken corrective action and on or before Date 3, X made
corrective distributions to its shareholders, thus eliminating the cumulative amount of
the disproportionate distributions made from X to its shareholders. X represents that
neither X nor its shareholders intended to terminate X’s Subchapter S election and that
X and its shareholders have filed consistently with being an S corporation. In addition,
X represents that, other than the potential termination due to a second class of stock, X
has qualified as a small business corporation at all times since its election on Date 1.
Lastly, X and its shareholders agree to make any adjustments required as a condition of
obtaining relief under the inadvertent termination rule as provided under § 1362(f) of the
Code as may be required by the Secretary.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to any
taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in
effect for the year. Section 1361(b)(1) defines a “small business corporation” as a
domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation which does not (A) have
more than 100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate,
and a trust described in subsection (c)(2), or an organization described in subsection
(c)(6)) who is not an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D)
have more than 1 class of stock.
Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be terminated
whenever (at any time on or after the 1st day of the taxable year for which the
corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business
corporation. Section 1362(d)(2)(B) further provides that the termination shall be effective
on and after the date of cessation.
Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-1(I)(1) provides that a corporation is generally treated as having
only one class of stock if all outstanding shares of stock of the corporation confer
identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds.
Section § 1.1361-1(I)(2)(i) provides, in part, that the determination of whether all
outstanding shares of stock confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation
proceeds is made based on the corporate charter, articles of incorporation, bylaws,
applicable state laws, and binding agreements relating to distribution and liquidation
+PLR-130818-14 3
proceeds (collectively, governing provisions). Although a corporation is not treated as
having more than one class of stock so long as the governing provisions provide for
identical distribution and liquidation rights, any distributions (including actual,
constructive, or deemed distributions) that differ in timing and amount are to be given
appropriate tax effect in accordance with the facts and circumstances.
Section 1362(f) provides in part that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any
corporation was terminated under § 1362(d), (2) the Secretary determines that the
circumstances resulting in the termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a
reasonable period of time after the discovery of the circumstances resulting in the
termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for which the termination occurred
is a small business corporation, and (4) the corporation for which the termination
occurred, and each person who was a shareholder in such corporation at any time
during the period of inadvertent termination of the S election, agrees to makes such
adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as
may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the
circumstances resulting in the termination, the corporation is treated as an S corporation
during the period specified by the Secretary.
CONCLUSION
Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that if the
erroneous disproportionate distributions made by X to its shareholders caused X’s S
corporation election to terminate, the termination was inadvertent within the meaning of
§ 1362(f). Therefore, X will be treated as an S corporation effective the beginning of
Period and thereafter, provided X’s S corporation election is not otherwise terminated
under § 1362(d).
Except as specifically ruled upon above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the
federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the
Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion regarding X’s eligibility to be an S
corporation.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. According to § 6110(k)(3),
this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.
+PLR-130818-14 4
Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this
letter to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Laura C. Fields
Laura C. Fields
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy of this letter for section 6110 purposes
+
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.