Private Letter Ruling 201518022 Released May 1, 2015 Approved Transcribed from scan

Pension plan may change four non-prescribed actuarial assumptions

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A defined benefit pension plan requested approval to change non-prescribed actuarial assumptions for a plan year beginning October 1, 2013. The changes covered retirement rates, disability rates, select and ultimate withdrawal rates, and the percentage electing a joint and survivor option. The IRS approved the changes under IRC § 430(h)(5) and the corresponding ERISA provision. It did not express an opinion on the accuracy of the plan's calculations or whether the plan satisfied other Code requirements. The plan was instructed to report the change on Schedule SB of Form 5500 and attach the ruling.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the pension plan use the proposed changes to four actuarial assumptions for the specified plan year?
  • Outcome: Approved.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 430(h)(5); ERISA § 303(h)(5)

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 0430.00-00

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

FEB 04 2015

SE:T:EP:RA

Re:

Dear

This letter constitutes notice that approval has been granted for the change in
assumptions as described below. The ruling applies for the plan year beginning
October 1, 2013. This ruling is made in accordance with section 430(h)(5) of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code) and section 303(h)(5) of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974. Your authorized representatives reviewed and confirmed
each of the rates contained in this ruling on November 10, 2014.

In issuing this ruling, we have considered only the acceptability of the new assumptions
and, as necessary, the method by which the transition is to be made between the prior
and the new assumptions. Accordingly, we are not expressing any opinion as to the
accuracy or acceptability of any calculation or other material submitted with your
request. Please note that this letter addresses only specific issues arising under
section 430 of the Code and the approval granted herein should not be read to imply
that the Plan as it stands satisfies the requirements of other sections of the Code.

This approval applies to the following changes in assumptions:

• Retirement rates

• Disability rates

• Select and ultimate withdrawal rates

• Percent electing a joint and survivor option

+2

201518022

The retirement rates that have been approved are as follows:

10/1/20

Age Less than 30 years 30 - 32 years Over 32 years
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70

10/1/20

Age Less than 30 years 30 - 32 years Over 32 years
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58

+3

201518022

10/1/20

Age Less than 30 years 30 - 32 years Over 32 years
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70

10/1/20

Age Less than 30 years 30 - 32 years Over 32 years
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70

+4

201518022

10/1/20

Age Less than 30 years 30 - 32 years Over 32 years
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70

The disability rates that have been approved are as follows:

Age Rates
27 %
28 %
29 %
30 %
31 %
32 %
33 %
34 %
35 %
36 %
37 %
38 %
39 %
40 %

+5

201518022

Disability rates (Continued)

Age Rates
41 %
42 %
43 %
44 %
45 %
46 %
47 %
48 %
49 %
50 %
51 %
52 %
53 %
54 %
55 %
56 %
57 %
58 %
59 %
60 %
61 %
62 %
63 %
64 %

The withdraw rates that have been approved are as follows:

Age/Service 0 1 2 3 4 5
25 % % % % % %
26 % % % % % %
27 % % % % % %
28 % % % % % %
29 % % % % % %
30 % % % % % %

+6

201518022

Withdraw rates (continued)

Age 0 1 2 3 4 5
31 % % % % % %
32 % % % % % %
33 % % % % % %
34 % % % % % %
35 % % % % % %
36 % % % % % %
37 % % % % % %
38 % % % % % %
39 % % % % % %
40 % % % % % %
41 % % % % % %
42 % % % % % %
43 % % % % % %
44 % % % % % %
45 % % % % % %
46 % % % % % %
47 % % % % % %
48 % % % % % %
49 % % % % % %
50 % % % % % %
51 % % % % % %
52 % % % % % %
53 % % % % % %
54 % % % % % %
55 % % % % % %
56 % % % % % %
57 % % % % % %
58 % % % % % %
59+ % % % % % %

The percent electing a joint and survivor option assumption is approved as
follows:

      Percentage

Male %
Female %

When filing Form 5500 for the plan year beginning October 1, , please indicate on
line 24 of the Schedule SB by checking the “Yes” box that a change in non-prescribed
assumptions has been made for the current year. You should also include a copy of
this letter as an attachment to the Schedule SB labeled: “Schedule SB, line 24 —
Change in Non-Prescribed Actuarial Assumptions.”

+7

201518022

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
(ID# ) at .

Sincerely yours,

David M. Ziegler, Manager
Employee Plans Actuarial Group 2

Cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.