Trust merger preserves grandfathered GST status and separate shares
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A trust created under a decedent's pre-September 25, 1985 will was exempt from generation-skipping transfer tax under the grandfather rule. The trustee proposed merging it into a later trust funded by the life beneficiary's spouse, whose dispositive terms matched during the beneficiary's life but continued in further trusts afterward. Because each later beneficiary would hold a general power of appointment, the merger would not shift a beneficial interest to a lower generation or impermissibly extend vesting. The IRS ruled that the assets from the older trust would retain their grandfathered GST status and distributions of those assets would not be subject to GST tax. It also ruled that the portions attributable to the decedent and the spouse would remain separate trusts for GST purposes because they had different transferors.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Will merging the grandfathered trust into the later trust preserve GST exemption and separate-transferor treatment?
- Outcome: Approved: grandfathered status is preserved, covered distributions remain exempt, and the two contributed portions remain separate for GST purposes.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 2041, 2601, 2652, and 2654; Treas. Reg. §§ 26.2601-1 and 26.2654-1.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201516036 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/17/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2601.00-00, 2601.04-01,
2602.00-00, 2654.03-00 Person To Contact:
---------------, ID No. ----------------
-------------------------------------------------------- ---- Telephone Number:
----------- --------------------
------------------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
--------------------------- CC:PSI:04
---------------------------- PLR-128484-14
Date:
December 18, 2014
RE: -------------------------------------------------------
Legend
Testator = ----------------------------
Date 1 = ----------------------
Date 2 = -----------------
Date 3 = ----------------------
Son = -----------------------------
Daughter = --------------------------------
Trust A = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trustee = ------------------------------------------------------
State 1 = -------------------
Date 4 = ---------------------
State 2 = ------------
Statute 1 = -----------------------------------------------
Date 5 = -----------------------
Year = ------
Spouse = ------------------------
Trust B = -----------------------------------
a = ---------
Statute 2 = -------------------------------------------------------
Statute 3 = -----------------------------------------------------
Date 6 = ------------------
b = --
PLR-128484-14 2
Dear ------------:
This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter of June 26, 2014,
regarding the generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax consequences of a proposed
merger of Trust A and Trust B.
FACTS
The facts and representations submitted are as follows.
Testator executed a will, dated Date 1, and two codicils, dated Date 1 and
Date 2. Testator died on Date 3, a date prior to September 25, 1985, survived by
Testator’s children, Son and Daughter.
Article VII of Testator’s will created a trust, Trust A, for the benefit of Son and
Son’s lineal descendants. The current trustee of Trust A is Trustee. An identical trust
was created for Daughter. This private letter ruling pertains to Trust A.
Currently, Article VII, Section 1(2)(iii), provides that the trustee of Trust A shall
pay to Son or apply for his benefit the net income in convenient monthly or quarterly
installments until the death of Son. Article VII, Section 2 provides that if, in the sole
judgment of the trustee, the net income from Trust A, supplemented by funds available
from other sources to Son, is not sufficient to meet the reasonable needs of Son in his
station in life, then the trustee may pay to or apply for the benefit of Son so much of the
principal of Trust A as the trustee in its sole discretion shall from time to time deem
requisite or desirable without being required to adjust or account with respect to the
interest of any other beneficiary under the provisions of Article VII.
Article VII, Section 1(2)(iv) provides that upon the death of Son, all the funds
and properties constituting Trust A is to vest in and be delivered and conveyed to Son’s
surviving issue, per stirpes. If Son leaves no issue surviving him, the assets of Trust A
will be added to a trust for the benefit of Daughter. Article VII, Section 4 provides that if
Son dies and is not survived by any lineal descendants, by Daughter, or by any lineal
descendants of Daughter, the assets of Trust A are to be distributed to the persons who
are entitled to take Testator’s personal property under the laws of intestacy then in
effect in State 1.
Section 3 of Article VII provides that if any of the properties constituting a part of
Trust A shall vest in the issue of Son who is under age 21, then such beneficiary’s share
is to remain in trust until the beneficiary’s 21st birthday. The trustee may make income
or principal distributions to such beneficiary in its sole discretion, for the suitable support
PLR-128484-14 3
and education of the beneficiary until the beneficiary attains age 21, or sooner die,
whereupon the principal and any accumulated income of such trust shall be delivered,
discharged of the trust.
On Date 4, upon the appointment of Trustee as successor trustee, the principal
place of administration of Trust A was moved from State 1 to State 2 with the consent of
Son and Son’s living issue, in accordance with Statute 1. Accordingly, Trust A is
governed under the laws of State 2.
On Date 5, in Year 1, Son’s spouse, Spouse, established an irrevocable trust,
Trust B, for the benefit of Son and Son’s lineal descendants. The trustee of Trust B is
Trustee. Spouse funded Trust B with $a. Spouse intends to allocate $a of her available
GST tax exemption to the transfer on Spouse’s Year Form 709, United States Gift (and
Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return. Accordingly, it is represented that Trust B
will have an inclusion ratio of zero with respect to the assets contributed by Spouse.
During Son’s lifetime, the dispositive terms of Trust B are identical to the
provisions of Trust A. Article IV(A) of Trust B provides that the net income of Trust B
shall be paid to or applied for the benefit of Son in convenient monthly or quarterly
installments until the death of Son. Article IV(B) provides that if, in the sole judgment of
the trustee, the net income from Trust B, supplemented by funds available from other
sources to Son, shall not be sufficient to meet the reasonable needs of Son in his
station in life, then the trustee may pay to or apply for the benefit of Son so much of the
principal of Trust B as the trustee in its sole discretion shall from time to time deem
requisite or desirable without being required to adjust or account with respect to the
interest of any other beneficiary.
Article IV(C) provides that upon Son’s death, all the funds and properties
constituting Trust B is to be apportioned among Son’s surviving issue, per stirpes, and
each share so apportioned will be held as a separate trust for the benefit of such issue
in accordance with Article V of Trust B (Further Trusts). If Son dies leaving no issue
surviving, all the funds and properties constituting Trust B shall be delivered outright
and free of trust to Daughter, if she is living. If Daughter is not then living, then Trust B
shall be delivered outright and free of trust to the surviving issue of Daughter,
per stirpes. If Son is not survived by living issue, by Daughter, or by any living issue of
Daughter, then Trust B shall be delivered outright and free of trust to the then living
person or persons who would be entitled to receive the personal property of Testator
under the laws of intestacy then in effect in State 1.
Article V provides that the trustee shall hold Trust B in separate trusts for each
descendant of Son. Each descendent is referred to as “Beneficiary” for purposes of
Articles V. Article V(A) provides that the trustee may pay or apply all or any portion of
the net income for the Beneficiary of a Further Trust, in the trustee’s absolute discretion.
Any net income not paid shall be added to principal. During any taxable year of the
PLR-128484-14 4
trust in which the net income is less than b percent of the net fair market value of the
trust assets as of the first day of such taxable year, trust income shall be deemed to be
increased by an amount that, when added to the actual net income of the trust, will
equal b percent of the net fair market value of the trust assets as of the first day of such
taxable year. Article V(B) provides that the trustee may transfer and pay over all or any
part of the principal of the Further Trust to or for the benefit of the Beneficiary.
Article V(C) provides that each Beneficiary shall have the power to appoint, by
specific reference to this general power of appointment in the Beneficiary’s will, all or
any part of the principal and income of the Beneficiary’s Further Trust remaining at the
time of the Beneficiary’s death to one or more lineal descendants of Son, or to the
Beneficiary’s estate, in such proportions and amounts as the Beneficiary shall designate
in the Beneficiary’s absolute discretion.
Article V(D) provides that if the Beneficiary does not exercise his or her general
power of appointment, the property remaining in the Beneficiary’s Further Trust will be
apportioned in equal shares with one share for each of the Beneficiary’s children who is
then living, and one share for each of the Beneficiary’s children who is then deceased
and survived by living issue, per stirpes. If the Beneficiary has no living lineal
descendants, the property remaining in the Beneficiary’s Further Trust will be
apportioned among the Beneficiary’s living siblings and the living descendants of any of
the Beneficiary’s deceased siblings, per stirpes. In default of all the foregoing
beneficiaries, the property remaining in the Beneficiary’s Further Trust will be
apportioned among the lineal descendants of Son, per stirpes. Each share apportioned
for a lineal descendant will be held in a separate trust for that descendant, which will be
administered under the terms of Article V of Trust B.
Subject to the receipt of a favorable private letter ruling, Trustee will merge
Trust A into Trust B, as reflected in the Trust Merger Agreement dated Date 6. All of the
presumptive remainder beneficiaries have consented to the merger of Trust A into
Trust B. Following the merger, all of the assets of Trust A and Trust B will be
administered in accordance with the terms of Trust B.
Statute 2 provides that a trustee may merge any 2 or more trusts, whether or not
created by the same trustor, to be held and administered as a single trust if such a
merger would not result in a material change in the beneficial interests of the trust
beneficiaries, or any of them, in the trust. A trustee may merge trusts under Statute 2
without authorization by the court. Statute 3.
You have requested the following rulings:
-
The merger of Trust A into Trust B will not cause the portion of Trust A merged
into Trust B to lose its status as a “grandfathered” trust exempt from GST tax
under § 26.2601-1(b).
PLR-128484-14 5 -
Future distributions from Trust B attributable to assets received from Trust A to
Son or Beneficiary (as defined in Trust B) will not be subject to GST tax. -
Following the merger of Trust A into Trust B, the portion of the merged trust
attributable to the assets received from Trust A and the portion of the merged
trust attributable to the assets contributed to Trust B by Spouse will be treated as
separate trusts for GST tax purposes.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Ruling 1
Section 2601of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a tax on every generation-
skipping transfer. Section 2611(a) provides that the term “generation-skipping transfer”
means: (1) a taxable distribution; (2) a taxable termination; and (3) a direct skip.
Under section 1433 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the Act), the GST tax is
generally applicable to generation-skipping transfers made after October 22, 1986.
However, under § 1433(b)(2)(A) of the Act and § 26.2601-1(b)(1)(i) of the
Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations, the tax does not apply to a transfer
under a trust that was irrevocable on September 25, 1985, except to the extent the
transfer is made out of corpus added to the trust by an actual or constructive addition
after September 25, 1985.
Section 26.2601-1(b)(1)(ii)(A) provides that any trust in existence on
September 25, 1985 will be considered an irrevocable trust except as provided in
§ 26.2601-1(b)(1)(ii)(B) or (C) (relating to property includible in the grantor’s gross
estate under §§ 2038 and 2042).
Section 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i) provides rules for determining when a modification,
judicial construction, settlement agreement, or trustee action with respect to a trust that
is exempt from the generation-skipping transfer tax under § 26.2601-1(b) will not cause
the trust to lose its exempt status. These rules are applicable only for purposes of
determining whether an exempt trust retains its exempt status for generation-skipping
transfer tax purposes. The rules do not apply in determining, for example, whether the
transaction results in a gift subject to gift tax, or may cause the trust to be included in
the gross estate of a beneficiary, or may result in the realization of capital gain for
purposes of § 1001.
Section 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i)(D) provides that a modification of the governing
instrument of an exempt trust by judicial reformation, or nonjudicial reformation that is
valid under applicable state law, will not cause an exempt trust to be subject to the
provisions of chapter 13 if the modification does not shift a beneficial interest in the trust
PLR-128484-14 6
to any beneficiary who occupies a lower generation (as defined in § 2651) than the
person or persons who held the beneficial interest prior to the modification, and the
modification does not extend the time for vesting of any beneficial interest in the trust
beyond the period provided for in the original trust. A modification of an exempt trust
will result in a shift in a beneficial interest to a lower generation beneficiary if the
modification can result in either an increase in the amount of a generation-skipping
transfer or the creation of a new generation-skipping transfer.
In the instant case, the merger of Trust A and Trust B is permitted under State 2
law if such merger would not result in a material change in the beneficial interests of the
trust beneficiaries. Statute 2. Statute 3 provides that a trustee may act under Statute 2
without the authorization by the court. The beneficiaries, including the presumptive
remainder beneficiaries, have consented to the merger of Trust A into Trust B and
Trustee executed the Trust Merger Agreement. During Son’s lifetime, the terms of
Trust A and Trust B are identical. Pursuant to the terms of Trust A, upon Son’s death,
the assets of Trust A will be distributed outright to Son’s surviving issue, per stirpes.
Pursuant to the terms of Trust B, upon Son’s death, the properties constituting Trust B
will be apportioned for the benefit of each surviving issue of Son, per stirpes, in
respective Further Trusts. However, each Beneficiary of a Further Trust is granted a
general power of appointment over his or her respective trust, which will cause that trust
to be includible in such Beneficiary’s gross estate at the Beneficiary’s death under
§ 2041(a)(2). Further, each Beneficiary will be treated as the transferor of the trust
corpus for GST tax purposes under § 2652(a)(1).
Accordingly, the terms of each Further Trust will not extend the time for vesting of
any beneficial interest in the trust in a manner that may postpone or suspend the
vesting, absolute ownership, or power of alienation of an interest in property for a
period, measured from the date the original trust, Trust A, became irrevocable,
extending beyond any life in being at the date the original trust became irrevocable plus
a period of 21 years. Moreover, each Further Trust will not shift a beneficial interest in
the trust to any beneficiary who occupies a lower generation (as defined in § 2651) than
the person or persons who held the beneficial interest prior to the trustee action.
Therefore, based on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that
the merger of Trust A into Trust B will not cause the portion of Trust A merged into
Trust B to lose its status as a “grandfathered” trust exempt from GST tax under
§ 26.2601-1(b). Further, future distributions from Trust B attributable to assets received
from Trust A to Son or Beneficiary (as defined in Trust B) will not be subject to GST tax.
Ruling 2
Section 2652(a)(1) provides that for purposes of chapter 13 the term “transferor”
means: (A) in the case of any property subject to the tax imposed by chapter 11, the
decedent; and (B) in the case of any property subject to the tax imposed by chapter 12,
PLR-128484-14 7
the donor. An individual shall be treated as transferring any property with respect
to which such individual is the transferor.
Section 2654(b)(1) provides that for purposes of this chapter, the portions of a
trust attributable to transfers from different transferors shall be treated as separate
trusts.
Section 26.2654-1(a)(2)(i) provides that if there is more than one transferor with
respect to a trust, the portions of the trust attributable to the different transferors are
treated as separate trusts for purposes of chapter 13. Treatment of a single trust as
separate trusts under this paragraph does not permit treatment of those portions as
separate trusts for purposes of filing returns and payment of tax or for purposes of
computing any other tax imposed under the Code. Also, additions to, and distributions
from, such trusts are allocated pro rata among the separate trusts unless otherwise
expressly provided in the governing instrument.
Section 26.2654-1(a)(5), Example 5, illustrates a situation where A transfers
$100,000 to an irrevocable generation-skipping trust; B simultaneously transfers
$50,000 to the same trust. As of the time of the transfers, the single trust is treated as
two trusts for purposes of chapter 13. Because A contributed 2/3 of the value of the
initial corpus, 2/3 of the single trust principal is treated as a separate trust created by A.
Similarly, because B contributed 1/3 of the value of the initial corpus, 1/3 of the single
trust is treated as a separate trust created by B. A or B may allocate their
GST exemption under § 2632(a) to the respective separate trusts.
In the instant case, Testator is the transferor of the assets in Trust A for purposes
of § 2652(a) and Spouse is the transferor of the assets in Trust B for purposes of
§2652(c). Accordingly, pursuant to § 2654(b)(1), Trust A and Trust B, comprising the
merged trusts which portions are attributed to two different transferors, will be treated as
separate trusts.
Based on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that
following the merger of Trust A and Trust B, the portion of the merged trust attributable
to the assets received from Trust A and the portion of the trust attributable to the assets
contributed to Trust B by Spouse, will be treated as separate trusts for GST tax
purposes.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of
the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-128484-14 8
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this
letter is being sent to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Lorraine E. Gardner
Senior Counsel, Branch 4
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (1)
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.