Private Letter Ruling 201516014 Released April 17, 2015 Approved

Supplemental spin-off payment may fund qualifying creditor repayment

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

This supplemental ruling addressed a possible additional payment following a completed contribution and external distribution covered by an earlier spin-off ruling. The IRS ruled that any payment, other than the portion treated as interest under section 483, would be money or other property received in exchange for the contributed property under section 361(b)(1). If the distributing corporation uses equal cash within the redacted period to repay creditors whose debts existed at the distribution date, that repayment will be treated as a distribution under the reorganization plan. Both conclusions depend on execution of the attached closing agreement. The IRS did not rule on the amount of section 483 interest income.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How is the additional payment treated, and can matching creditor repayments qualify under section 361(b)?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to timely repayment of existing creditors and execution of the closing agreement.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 361(b) and 483; Arrowsmith v. Commissioner, 344 U.S. 6 (1952).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201516014 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/17/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 355.01-00, 361.00-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------------- -----------------, ID No. ----------------
--------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------------------------- --------------------
----------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------------- CC:CORP:1
PLR-123957-14
Date:
December 05, 2014

                                                 LEGEND

Distributing 4 = --------------------------------------------


Controlled 2 = ------------------------------
---------------------------------------



Business A = ------------------------------

$aa = -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
----------------

Additional Payment = ----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------

Board Resolution = ----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------

aaa = -----

Date 5 = ------------------
PLR-123957-14 2

Date 6 = ----------------

Dear --------------------:

   This letter responds to your letter dated June 17, 2014, requesting that we

supplement our letter ruling dated June 4, 2014 (PLR-137376-13) (the “Prior Letter
Ruling”). The information submitted for consideration is summarized below. Capitalized
terms not defined in this letter have the meanings assigned to them in the Prior Letter
Ruling.

   This letter is issued pursuant to section 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 2014-1, 2014-1 I.R.B.

15, regarding one or more significant issues under sections 332, 351, 355, 368, or
1036. The rulings contained in this letter only address one or more discrete legal
issues involved in the transaction. This Office expresses no opinion in this letter as
to the overall tax consequences of the transactions described in this letter or as to
any issue not specifically addressed by the rulings below.

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon the information and

representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by penalty of perjury
statements executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the
materials submitted in support of the request for rulings. Verification of the information,
representations, and other data may be required as part of the audit process.

   The Prior Letter Ruling addresses certain federal income tax consequences of

the Proposed Transactions under sections 355, 368 and certain other relevant
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Except as modified below, the representations
and material facts set forth in the Prior Letter Ruling remain in effect for purposes of this
supplemental letter ruling.

                             SUPPLEMENTAL FACTS

    The Controlled 2 Contribution and the External Distribution were completed on

Date 6. On Date 5, Distributing 4’s Board of Directors adopted the Board Resolution.
The Board Resolution authorized Distributing 4 to implement the External Distribution,
and stated that Distributing 4 will, in connection with the plan that includes the
Controlled 2 Contribution and the External Distribution, and within aaa months following
its receipt, if any, of the Additional Payment, use an amount of cash equal to the
Additional Payment to repay creditors to whom Distributing 4 had existing debt
obligations at the time of the External Distribution. Distributing 4 intends to establish a
separate bank account to deposit any Additional Payment received.

                                     RULINGS

PLR-123957-14 3

   Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, and

conditioned upon Distributing’s execution of the closing agreement attached hereto and
made a party hereof, we rule as follows:

  1. Any payment Distributing 4 receives as part of the Additional Payment, to the
    extent not treated as interest by reason of section 483, will be treated as “other
    property or money” within the meaning of section 361(b)(1) received by
    Distributing 4 in exchange for the property Distributing 4 transferred to Controlled
    2 in the Controlled 2 Contribution (Arrowsmith v. Commissioner, 344 U.S. 6
    (1952)).

  2. Provided that within aaa months following its receipt, if any, of the Additional
    Payment, Distributing 4 transfers an amount of cash equal to the Additional
    Payment to repay creditors to whom Distributing 4 had existing debt obligations
    at the time of the External Distribution, the transfer will be treated as a
    distribution by Distributing 4 in pursuance of the plan of reorganization within the
    meaning of Section 361(b). Sections 361(b)(1)(A), 361(b)(3).

                             CLOSING AGREEMENT
    
    In connection with the issuance of this supplemental ruling letter, a closing
    

    agreement is being entered into between the Internal Revenue Service and the
    taxpayer with respect to certain of those issues affecting its tax liability on the basis set
    forth above. Pursuant to our practice with respect to such agreements, the closing
    agreement contains a stipulation to the effect that any change or modification of
    applicable statutes enacted subsequent to the date of this agreement and made
    applicable to the taxable period involved will render the agreement ineffective to the
    extent that it is dependent upon such statutes. This private letter ruling will become
    effective upon execution of the closing agreement.

                                     CAVEATS
    

    Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied
    concerning the tax treatment of the Supplemental Facts or the Proposed Transaction
    under any provision of the Code and regulations or the tax treatment of any condition
    existing at the time of, or effects resulting from the Supplemental Facts or the Proposed
    Transaction that is not specifically covered by the above rulings or the Prior Letter
    Ruling. In particular, we express no opinion regarding:

    (i) The extent to which Distributing 4 will be required to include in its gross
    income amounts treated as interest by reason of section 483 with respect
    to the Additional Payment.

                            PROCEDURAL MATTERS
    

    PLR-123957-14 4

    This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of
    the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

    A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is
    relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this
    requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control
    number (PLR-123957-14) of the letter ruling.

     In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this
    

    letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

                                   Sincerely,
    
                                   Maury Passman
                                   Chief, Branch 4
                                   Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
    

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.