Fund's two-day-late mixed straddle election is treated as timely

Number
201516010
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Mixed Straddle Account
Code sections
§ 1092
Ruling dated
December 12, 2014
Publicly released
April 17, 2015

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An exchange traded fund intended to renew its mixed straddle account election for foreign-currency forward contracts used as hedges. The fund's administrator prepared Form 6781 before the deadline but failed to tell the third-party provider that filed Form 7004 to include it. The oversight was discovered almost immediately, and the election was filed two days late. The IRS found reasonable cause for the missed deadline and treated the election as timely filed. It did not decide whether the fund's designated class of activities otherwise qualified under the mixed straddle regulations.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Will a mixed straddle account election filed two days late be treated as timely?
  • Outcome: Approved because the fund showed reasonable cause for the late filing.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1092(b); Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.1092(b)-4T.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201516010
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/17/2015
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1092.05-02
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------------------- --------------, ID No. ----------------
-------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------------------------------
--------------------
----------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
---------------------------
CC:FIP:B06
PLR-123359-14
Date:
December 12, 2014

Legend

Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entity 1 = ----------------------------------
Entity 2 = ---------------------------------
Entity 3 = -----------------------
Foreign Currency = --------------------
Date 1 = ---------------------------
Date 2 = -----------------------
Date 3 = -----------------------
Date 4 = -----------------------
Date 5 = ------------------
Date 6 = -----------------------
Year 1 = ------
X = ------------------
Employee 1 = --------------------------------------------------------
Employee 2 = --------------------------------------------

Dear --------------:

This is in reply to a letter dated June 11, 2014, submitted on behalf of Taxpayer by its authorized representative. Taxpayer requests an extension of time to file an election under section 1092(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and section 1.1092(b)-4T(f) of the Temporary Income Tax Regulations.

FACTS

Taxpayer is an open-ended investment company that was formed on Date 1 and has been registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 since inception. Taxpayer is managed and administered by Entity 1, which also administers other funds.
PLR-123359-14
2

In accordance with the terms of its management agreement with Taxpayer, Entity 1 provides a multitude of services to Taxpayer, including tax compliance and consulting services.

Taxpayer is an actively managed exchange traded fund that intends to invest at least 80% of its net assets in a portfolio that consists primarily of U.S. dollar- denominated investment-grade fixed and floating rate securities of varying maturities, such as corporate and government bonds, agency securities, instruments of non-U.S. issuers, privately issued securities, asset-backed securities, structured securities, municipal bonds, money market instruments, and investment companies.

During Taxpayer’s initial short period, from inception on Date 1 to Date 2, Taxpayer entered into forward currency contracts for the purpose of hedging against the effects of fluctuations in value of Foreign Currency (against the U.S. dollar) on the value of Taxpayer’s assets that are denominated in Foreign Currency. Taxpayer entered into similar contracts for the taxable year ending on Date 3. Taxpayer represents that it timely filed a mixed straddle election for its investments in the forward currency contracts for its short taxable year ending on Date 2 and intended to do so again for the taxable year ending on Date 3.

The renewal of the election for the taxable year ending on Date 3 was required to be filed by Date 4. Employee 1, an employee of Entity 1, Employee 2, an immediate supervisor, and Entity 2, Taxpayer’s independent tax advisor, together decided that the election should be made for the taxable year ending on Date 3. Employee 1 had primary responsibility for preparing and timely filing the forms necessary to make the election. Accordingly, Employee 1 prepared the Form 6781 and the required supporting statement in early Date 5.

Entity 1 intended to file the mixed straddle election along with the Form 7004, Application for Automatic Extension of Time to File Certain Business Income Tax, Information, and Other Returns, for Taxpayer, due on or before the same date as Form 6781. Form 7004 for Taxpayer was routinely prepared and filed by Entity 3, a third party service provider. However, Entity 1 failed to inform Entity 3 of its intention to file Form 6781 along with Form 7004 for Taxpayer. As a result, Entity 3 did not file the mixed straddle election. In addition, during the period leading up to the deadline, Entity 1 was focused on reviewing Form 1099 reporting data for approximately X separate funds, and the fact that Form 6781 had not yet been filed was inadvertently overlooked.

It was the clear intention of Entity 1 to file Form 6781 on or before Date 4. The decision was made by Entity 1 in consultation with Entity 2 prior to Date 4, and Form 6781 was prepared prior to Date 4. In addition, the error was identified almost immediately, and Form 6781 was filed on Date 6, two days after the filing due date.

LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1.1092(b)-4T(a) of the Regulations generally permits a taxpayer to elect (in accordance with paragraph (f) of section 1.1092(b)-4T) to establish one or more
PLR-123359-14
3

“mixed straddle accounts.” Section 1.1092(b)-4T(b) defines a mixed straddle account to mean an account for determining gains and losses from all positions held as capital assets in a designated class of activities by the taxpayer at the time the taxpayer elects to establish a mixed straddle account.

Section 1.1092(b)-4T(f)(1) of the Regulations generally provides that, except as otherwise provided, the election to establish one or more mixed straddle accounts for a taxable year must be made by the due date (without regard to any extensions) of the taxpayer's income tax return for the immediately preceding taxable year (or part thereof). Section 1.1092(b)-4T(f)(1) further provides that if an election is made after the time specified above, the election will be permitted only if the Commissioner concludes that the taxpayer had reasonable cause for failing to make a timely election. Because section 1.1092(b)-4T(f)(1) provides specific guidance about making a late mixed straddle account election, the rules generally applicable to late elections described in section 301.9100-3 do not apply to this late mixed straddle account election.

CONCLUSION

Based on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that Taxpayer has shown reasonable cause for failing to make a timely election under section 1.1092(b)-4T(f) of the Regulations. Therefore, the mixed straddle account election for the taxable year ending on Date 3, filed on Date 6, will be considered as timely filed.

Except as specifically ruled upon above, no opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the Code and Regulations which may be applicable thereto, or the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of or effects resulting from the transaction. Specifically, no opinion is expressed concerning whether the positions designated by Taxpayer as the class of activities is a permissible designation under section 1.1092(b)-4T(b)(2) of the Regulations.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Christina Morrison
Christina Morrison
Branch Chief, Branch 6
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions & Products)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace