Fund's two-day-late mixed straddle election is treated as timely
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An exchange traded fund intended to renew its mixed straddle account election for foreign-currency forward contracts used as hedges. The fund's administrator prepared Form 6781 before the deadline but failed to tell the third-party provider that filed Form 7004 to include it. The oversight was discovered almost immediately, and the election was filed two days late. The IRS found reasonable cause for the missed deadline and treated the election as timely filed. It did not decide whether the fund's designated class of activities otherwise qualified under the mixed straddle regulations.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Will a mixed straddle account election filed two days late be treated as timely?
- Outcome: Approved because the fund showed reasonable cause for the late filing.
- Key authorities: IRC § 1092(b); Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.1092(b)-4T.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201516010 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/17/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1092.05-02
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------------------- --------------, ID No. ----------------
-------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------- --------------------
---------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
--------------------------- CC:FIP:B06
PLR-123359-14
Date:
December 12, 2014
Legend
Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Entity 1 = ----------------------------------
Entity 2 = ---------------------------------
Entity 3 = -----------------------
Foreign Currency = --------------------
Date 1 = ---------------------------
Date 2 = -----------------------
Date 3 = -----------------------
Date 4 = -----------------------
Date 5 = ------------------
Date 6 = -----------------------
Year 1 = ------
X = ------------------
Employee 1 = --------------------------------------------------------
Employee 2 = --------------------------------------------
Dear --------------:
This is in reply to a letter dated June 11, 2014, submitted on behalf of Taxpayer
by its authorized representative. Taxpayer requests an extension of time to file an
election under section 1092(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and section
1.1092(b)-4T(f) of the Temporary Income Tax Regulations.
FACTS
Taxpayer is an open-ended investment company that was formed on Date 1 and
has been registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 since inception.
Taxpayer is managed and administered by Entity 1, which also administers other funds.
PLR-123359-14 2
In accordance with the terms of its management agreement with Taxpayer, Entity 1
provides a multitude of services to Taxpayer, including tax compliance and consulting
services.
Taxpayer is an actively managed exchange traded fund that intends to invest at
least 80% of its net assets in a portfolio that consists primarily of U.S. dollar-
denominated investment-grade fixed and floating rate securities of varying maturities,
such as corporate and government bonds, agency securities, instruments of non-U.S.
issuers, privately issued securities, asset-backed securities, structured securities,
municipal bonds, money market instruments, and investment companies.
During Taxpayer’s initial short period, from inception on Date 1 to Date 2,
Taxpayer entered into forward currency contracts for the purpose of hedging against the
effects of fluctuations in value of Foreign Currency (against the U.S. dollar) on the value
of Taxpayer’s assets that are denominated in Foreign Currency. Taxpayer entered into
similar contracts for the taxable year ending on Date 3. Taxpayer represents that it
timely filed a mixed straddle election for its investments in the forward currency
contracts for its short taxable year ending on Date 2 and intended to do so again for the
taxable year ending on Date 3.
The renewal of the election for the taxable year ending on Date 3 was required to
be filed by Date 4. Employee 1, an employee of Entity 1, Employee 2, an immediate
supervisor, and Entity 2, Taxpayer’s independent tax advisor, together decided that the
election should be made for the taxable year ending on Date 3. Employee 1 had
primary responsibility for preparing and timely filing the forms necessary to make the
election. Accordingly, Employee 1 prepared the Form 6781 and the required supporting
statement in early Date 5.
Entity 1 intended to file the mixed straddle election along with the Form 7004,
Application for Automatic Extension of Time to File Certain Business Income Tax,
Information, and Other Returns, for Taxpayer, due on or before the same date as Form
6781. Form 7004 for Taxpayer was routinely prepared and filed by Entity 3, a third
party service provider. However, Entity 1 failed to inform Entity 3 of its intention to file
Form 6781 along with Form 7004 for Taxpayer. As a result, Entity 3 did not file the
mixed straddle election. In addition, during the period leading up to the deadline, Entity
1 was focused on reviewing Form 1099 reporting data for approximately X separate
funds, and the fact that Form 6781 had not yet been filed was inadvertently overlooked.
It was the clear intention of Entity 1 to file Form 6781 on or before Date 4. The
decision was made by Entity 1 in consultation with Entity 2 prior to Date 4, and Form
6781 was prepared prior to Date 4. In addition, the error was identified almost
immediately, and Form 6781 was filed on Date 6, two days after the filing due date.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1.1092(b)-4T(a) of the Regulations generally permits a taxpayer to elect
(in accordance with paragraph (f) of section 1.1092(b)-4T) to establish one or more
PLR-123359-14 3
“mixed straddle accounts.” Section 1.1092(b)-4T(b) defines a mixed straddle account to
mean an account for determining gains and losses from all positions held as capital
assets in a designated class of activities by the taxpayer at the time the taxpayer elects
to establish a mixed straddle account.
Section 1.1092(b)-4T(f)(1) of the Regulations generally provides that, except as
otherwise provided, the election to establish one or more mixed straddle accounts for a
taxable year must be made by the due date (without regard to any extensions) of the
taxpayer's income tax return for the immediately preceding taxable year (or part
thereof). Section 1.1092(b)-4T(f)(1) further provides that if an election is made after the
time specified above, the election will be permitted only if the Commissioner concludes
that the taxpayer had reasonable cause for failing to make a timely election. Because
section 1.1092(b)-4T(f)(1) provides specific guidance about making a late mixed
straddle account election, the rules generally applicable to late elections described in
section 301.9100-3 do not apply to this late mixed straddle account election.
CONCLUSION
Based on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that Taxpayer
has shown reasonable cause for failing to make a timely election under section
1.1092(b)-4T(f) of the Regulations. Therefore, the mixed straddle account election for
the taxable year ending on Date 3, filed on Date 6, will be considered as timely filed.
Except as specifically ruled upon above, no opinion is expressed as to the tax
treatment of the transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the Code and
Regulations which may be applicable thereto, or the tax treatment of any conditions
existing at the time of or effects resulting from the transaction. Specifically, no opinion
is expressed concerning whether the positions designated by Taxpayer as the class of
activities is a permissible designation under section 1.1092(b)-4T(b)(2) of the
Regulations.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of
the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this
letter is being sent to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Christina Morrison
Christina Morrison
Branch Chief, Branch 6
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions & Products)
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.