Tax matters partner may bind certain small direct partners
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advised that a tax matters partner may bind non-notice partners to a settlement under former section 6224(c)(3). A non-notice partner for this purpose is a direct partner holding less than a one percent interest in a partnership with more than 100 partners. The advice identifies sections 6223 and 6231 and the section 301.6224(c)-1 regulations as the governing authorities.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May a tax matters partner bind non-notice partners to a TEFRA settlement?
- Outcome: Advice given: yes, under section 6224(c)(3).
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 6223(b), 6224(c)(3), and 6231(a)(8); Treas. Reg. § 301.6224(c)-1.
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2015031013474801 [Third Party Communication:
UILC: 6224.01-05
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Number: 201515033
Release Date: 4/10/2015
From:
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 1:47:48 PM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: TEFRA Closing Agreement question
The TMP can bind non-notice partners to a settlement under section 6224(c)(3). For this purpose, non-notice partner is defined as a direct partner with less than a one percent interest in a partnership with more than 100 partners. I.R.C. 6231(a)(8); 6223(b) and Treas. Reg. 301.6224(c)-1(a) and (b).
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace