Ezel / IRS Rulings / 201515030

Entity member, not its manager, may be the tax matters partner

Number
201515030
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Tax Matters Partner
Topics
Procedure, penalties, and administration
Code sections
§ 6231
Ruling dated
April 1, 2015
Publicly released
April 10, 2015
Source
View Official PDF

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised that the member-manager definition for a TEFRA partnership reaches only owners under state law, not owners or managers of an entity member. A direct entity member may be designated as the tax matters partner if it is also a manager under state law. The individual officer or manager who signs for that entity does not personally become the tax matters partner or member-manager. A designation remains valid when it clearly names the entity as tax matters partner and identifies the individual only as authorized to act for it.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can the manager of an entity member be designated personally as the TEFRA partnership's tax matters partner?
  • Outcome: Advice given: no, but the entity member itself may qualify and act through its authorized manager.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6231; Treas. Reg. § 301.6231(a)(7)-2.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2015040112064001 [Third Party Communication:

UILC: 6231.07-00
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]

Number: 201515030
Release Date: 4/10/2015
From:
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 12:06:40 PM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: Another quick inquiry...

The following statement is incorrect: “The general partner of FLP1 has been the member-manager of the taxpayer-partnership trough his interest in FLP1.”

The definition of member-manager under Treas. Reg. 301.6231(a)(7)-2 encompasses only the owners under state law and not the owners of the member. So only FLP1 is the “member”. So FLP1, if it is also a manager under state law, can be designated as the TMP as a “member-manager” of the TEFRA partnership. As a practical matter, only a state law officer/manager can sign documents for FLP1, but this does not make that manager the TMP or the “member-manager” of the TEFRA partnership who can be designated as TMP.

If the designation clearly designates FLP1 as the TMP, then it is the TMP. If its manager is set forth only as a person authorized to act for the TMP under state law, then this should not invalidate the designation of FLP1 as the TMP.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace