Deemed plant transfer preserves nuclear decommissioning trusts
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A corporate group planned for a disregarded subsidiary to elect corporate status, causing a deemed transfer of interests in two nuclear plants and their qualified decommissioning trusts. The operating licenses, direct plant interests, and trusts would remain held by a lower-tier disregarded entity throughout the restructuring. The IRS ruled that the deemed transfer would not disqualify the trusts and that they would continue satisfying section 468A and its regulations. Neither the trusts nor the transferor and transferee companies would recognize gain, loss, income, or deductions from the transfer. The trusts retain carryover basis in their assets. These rulings are conditioned on the transferor company not increasing asset basis because it assumes the plant-decommissioning liability.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: What happens to the nuclear decommissioning trusts when an entity classification election causes a deemed plant-interest transfer?
- Outcome: Approved on all five requested rulings, subject to the stated no-basis-increase condition.
- Key authorities: IRC § 468A; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.468A-5 and 1.468A-6.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201515014
Release Date: 4/10/2015
Index Number: 468A.04-02
-------------------------------- Person To Contact:
------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------ ID No. -------------------
----- ---------------------------------------------------
------------------------ Telephone Number:
---------------------------- ---------------------
--------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B06 – PLR-126660-14
Date:
December 9, 2014
Legend:
Taxpayer = -------------------------
-------------------------
Company A = -----------------------------
Company B = --------------------------- ------
Company C = -----------------------------
Company D = ---------------------------------
State A = --------------------
State B = --------------
X = ----
Plant A = ----------------------------
Plant B = ----------------------------
Location = --------------------------------
Director = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear --------------:
This letter responds to your request for private letter ruling dated
July 10, 2014. You requested that we rule on certain tax consequences, under section
468A of the Internal Revenue Code, of the restructuring discussed below.
Facts:
Taxpayer has represented the following facts and information relating to the
ruling request:
2
PLR-126660-14
Taxpayer, a corporation organized in State A, is the parent of an affiliated group
of subsidiary corporations. Company A, also organized in State A, is wholly-owned by
Taxpayer. Company A owns one hundred percent of the membership interests in
Company B, a limited liability company organized in State B. Company B owns one
hundred percent of the membership interests in Company C, a limited liability company
organized in State B. Company C owns one hundred percent of the membership
interests in Company D, also a limited liability company organized in State B.
Companies B, C, and D are entities disregarded for federal tax purposes.
Company D owns, as a tenant in common, an X percent interest in Plant A and
Plant B. Plant A and Plant B are nuclear power plants located at Location. Company D
holds the operating licenses issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for both
Plant A and Plant B. Company D maintains separate nuclear decommissioning trusts
that are qualified under § 468A (QDT) with respect to Plant A and Plant B. While
Company D holds the licenses for Plant A and Plant B, because Companies B, C, and
D are disregarded entities for federal tax purposes, Company A is considered to
indirectly hold the ownership interests in the Plants.
Taxpayer will undertake a series of transactions with respect to its ownership
structure. As part of that series of transactions, Company B will make an election to be
treated as an association taxable as a corporation under § 301.7701-3. Because
Company B will no longer be disregarded for federal tax purposes, the assets and
liabilities formerly considered indirectly held by Company A due to Company B’s status
as a disregarded entity are deemed transferred to Company B. These assets include
the ownership interests in Plant A and Plant B, as well as the related QDTs maintained
with respect to the plants. The operating licenses as well as the direct ownership
interest in the plants and the associated QDPs will be held by Company D at all relevant
times.
Taxpayer has requested the following rulings:
Requested Ruling #1: The QDTs will not be disqualified by reason of the transfer
caused by Company B electing to be treated as a corporation.
Requested Ruling #2: The QDTs will continue to be treated as satisfying the
requirements of § 468A and § 1.468A-5 and -6 of the Income Tax Regulations
after the transfer caused by Company B electing to be treated as a corporation.
Requested Ruling #3: The QDTs will not recognize any gain or loss or otherwise
take any income or deduction into account by reason of the transfer caused by
Company B electing to be treated as a corporation.
3
PLR-126660-14
Requested Ruling #4: Neither Company A nor Company B will be required to
recognize gain or loss or take any income or deduction into account as a result of
the transfers of the QDTs as a result of the transfer caused by Company B
electing to be treated as a corporation.
Requested Ruling #5: Pursuant to § 1.468A-6(c), the basis of the assets of the
QDTs will be unchanged by the transfer caused by Company B electing to be
treated as a corporation.
Law and Analysis:
Section 468A(a) of the Code provides that a taxpayer may elect to deduct
payments made to a nuclear decommissioning reserve fund that meets the
requirements of section 468A (i.e. a fund that is a "qualified nuclear decommissioning
fund").
Section 1.468A-1(b)(4) provides that a "qualified nuclear decommissioning fund"
is a fund that satisfies the requirements of section 1.468A-5.
Section 1.468A-5(a) of the Income Tax regulations sets out the qualification
requirements for nuclear decommissioning funds. It provides, in part, that a qualified
nuclear decommissioning fund must be established and maintained pursuant to an
arrangement that qualifies as a trust under state law.
Section 1.468A-5(a)(1)(iii) provides that an electing taxpayer can establish and
maintain only one qualified nuclear decommissioning fund for each nuclear power plant.
If a nuclear power plant is subject to the ratemaking jurisdiction of two or more public
utility commissions and any such public utility commission requires a separate fund to
be maintained for the benefit of ratepayers whose rates are established or approved by
the public utility commission, the separate funds maintained for such plant (whether or
not established and maintained pursuant to a single trust agreement) shall be
considered a single nuclear decommissioning fund.
Section 1.468A-6 provides rules applicable to the transfer of an interest in a
nuclear power plant (and transfer of the qualified nuclear decommissioning fund) where
certain requirements are met. Specifically, section 1.468A-6(b) provides that section
1.468A-6 applies if--
(1) Immediately before the disposition, the transferor maintained a qualified
nuclear decommissioning fund with respect to the interest disposed of; and
4
PLR-126660-14
(2) Immediately after the disposition--
(i) The transferee maintains a qualified nuclear decommissioning fund with
respect to the interest acquired;
(ii) The interest acquired is a qualifying interest of the transferee in the
nuclear power plant;
(3) In connection with the disposition, either—
(i) The transferee acquires part or all of the transferor’s qualifying interest
in the plant and a proportionate amount of the assets of the transferor’s
fund (all such assets if the transferee acquires the transferor’s entire
qualifying interest in the fund) is transferred to a fund of the transferee; or
(ii) The transferee acquires the transferor’s entire qualifying interest in the
plant and the transferor’s entire fund is transferred to the transferee; and
(4) The transferee continues to satisfy the requirements of section 1.468A-
5(a)(iii), which permits an electing taxpayer to maintain only one qualified nuclear
decommissioning fund for each plant.
Section 1.468A-6(c) provides that a disposition that satisfies the requirements of
section 1.468A-6(b) will have the following tax consequences at the time it occurs:
(1)(i) Neither the transferor nor the transferor’s qualified nuclear
decommissioning fund will recognize gain or loss or otherwise take any income into
account by reason of the transfer of a proportionate amount of the assets of the
transferor’s qualified nuclear decommissioning fund to the transferee’s qualified nuclear
decommissioning fund (or by reason of the transfer of the transferor’s entire qualified
nuclear decommissioning fund to the transferee). For purposes of the regulations under
section 468A, this transfer (or the transfer of the transferor’s qualified nuclear
decommissioning fund) will not be considered a distribution of assets by the transferor’s
qualified nuclear decommissioning fund.
(ii) Notwithstanding § 1.468A-6(c)(1)(i), if the transferor has made a special
transfer under § 1.468A-8 prior to the transfer of the fund or fund assets, any deduction
with respect to that special transfer allowable under § 468A(f)(2) for a taxable year
ending after the date of the transfer of the fund or fund assets is allowed under
§ 468A(f)(2)(C) for the taxable year that includes the date of the transfer of the fund or
fund assets.
PLR-126660-14 5
(2) Neither the transferee nor the transferee’s qualified nuclear decommissioning
fund will recognize gain or loss or otherwise take any income into account by reason of
the transfer of a proportionate amount of the assets of the transferor’s qualified nuclear
decommissioning fund to the transferee’s qualified nuclear decommissioning fund (or by
reason of the transfer of the transferor’s entire qualified nuclear decommissioning fund
to the transferee). For purposes of the regulations under section 468A, this transfer (or
the transfer of the transferor’s qualified nuclear decommissioning fund) will not
constitute a payment or a contribution of assets by the transferee to its qualified nuclear
decommissioning fund.
(3) Transfers of assets of a qualified nuclear decommissioning fund to which this
section applies do not affect basis. Thus, the transferee’s qualified nuclear
decommissioning fund will have a basis in the assets received from the transferor’s
qualified nuclear decommissioning fund that is the same as the basis of those assets in
the transferor’s qualified nuclear decommissioning fund immediately before the
distribution.
Under section 1.468A-6(f), the Service may treat any disposition of an interest in
a nuclear power plant occurring after December 27, 1994, as satisfying the
requirements of the regulations if the Service determines that such treatment is
necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of section 468A.
Conclusions:
Based on the information submitted by Taxpayer, we reach the following
conclusions:
Ruling #1: The QDTs will not be disqualified by reason of the transfer caused by
Company B electing to be treated as a corporation.
Ruling #2: The QDTs will continue to be treated as satisfying the requirements of
§ 468A and § 1.468A-5 and -6 of the Income Tax Regulations after the transfer
caused by Company B electing to be treated as a corporation.
Ruling #3: The QDTs will not recognize any gain or loss or otherwise take any
income or deduction into account by reason of the transfer caused by Company
B electing to be treated as a corporation.
Ruling #4: Neither Company A nor Company B will be required to recognize gain
or loss or take any income or deduction into account as a result of the transfers
of the QDTs as a result of the transfer caused by Company B electing to be
treated as a corporation.
PLR-126660-14 6
Ruling #5: Pursuant to § 1.468A-6(c), the basis of the assets of the QDTs will be
unchanged by the transfer caused by Company B electing to be treated as a
corporation.
Except as specifically determined above, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the Federal income tax consequences of the transaction described above.
Specifically, we express no opinion on the tax consequences of any portion of the
reorganization described by Taxpayer. In addition, the rulings above are specifically
conditioned on Company A not increasing their tax basis in any assets due to their
assumption of the liability for decommissioning the plants as a result of the deemed
transfer described above.
This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section
6110(k)(3) provides that this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, the original of this
letter is being sent to Taxpayer. We are also sending a copy of this letter ruling to
Taxpayer’ authorized representatives and to the Director.
Sincerely,
PETER C. FRIEDMAN
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 6
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
Passthroughs and Special Industries
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.