Private Letter Ruling 201513004 Released March 27, 2015 Approved Transcribed from scan

VEBA asset transfer preserves the transferor's tax exemption

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A voluntary employees' beneficiary association held assets for retiree life insurance and proposed transferring assets to another VEBA to fund retiree medical benefits under the same welfare plan. Every retiree eligible for medical benefits from the transferred assets already received basic life insurance under the plan. The IRS ruled that the transfer would not cause the transferring VEBA to lose its exemption under sections 501(a) and 501(c)(9). The ruling did not address the tax consequences to the company whose retirees were covered.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would transferring assets between the VEBAs cause the transferor to lose its tax exemption?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(a) and 501(c)(9); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.501(c)(9)-1, 1.501(c)(9)-3(c), and 1.501(c)(9)-4(a)

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Release Number: 201513004 Contact Person:
Release Date: 3/27/2015

Date: December 29, 2014

Uniform Issue List Identification Number:

501.09-00

Telephone Number:

Taxpayer Identification Number:

Legend:

Taxpayer =
Company A =
Company B =
Trust =
Plan A =
Year 1 =
Date 1 =
Date 2 =
Date 3 =

Dear . Xxxxxxxx:

This responds to your letter dated December 30, 2011, requesting a ruling as to the federal tax
consequences of a proposed transaction under section 501(c)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code).

FACTS

Taxpayer was established by Company A, Company B’s predecessor. Taxpayer holds assets
that are available to provide retiree life insurance under Plan A, a welfare benefit plan that
provides medical, dental, and life insurance benefits to retired employees of Company B and its
affiliates. Trust also was established by Company A and holds assets that are available to
provide retiree medical and dental benefits to retired management employees of Company A
who are covered by Plan A. Both Taxpayer and Trust are voluntary employees’ beneficiary
associations (VEBAs) that have received letters from the Internal Revenue Service stating that
they meet the requirements of section 501(c)(9). Taxpayer’s taxable year is the calendar year.

On Date 1, Taxpayer was amended, effective Date 2, to authorize transfers of assets to Trust.
During the Year 1 calendar year, Taxpayer proposes to transfer assets to Trust as needed to

Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx

will continue to pay life insurance benefits under Plan A.

Taxpayer represents that all of the retired employees who will be eligible for medical benefits
provided with the transferred assets currently receive basic life insurance under Plan A.
Taxpayer further represents that it will be terminated no later than Date 3.

RULING REQUESTED

You requested a ruling that the proposed transfer of assets from Taxpayer to Trust will not
cause Taxpayer to fail to be exempt from tax under section 501(a) as an organization described
under section 501(c)(9).

LAW

Section 501(c)(9) provides for the exemption from federal income tax of VEBAs providing for the
payment of life, sick, accident, or other benefits to the members of such association or their
dependents or designated beneficiaries if no part of the net earnings of such association inures
(other than through such payments) to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(9)-1 provides that for an organization to be described in section
501(c)(9), it must be an employees’ association; membership in the association must be
voluntary; the organization must provide for the payment of life, sick, accident, or other benefits
to its members; and there can be no inurement (other than by payment of permitted benefits) to
the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(9)-3(c) defines "sick and accident benefits" for purposes of section
501(c)(9) as amounts furnished to or on behalf of a member or a member's dependents in the
event of illness or injury to a member or a member's dependent. Such benefits may be
provided through reimbursement to a member or a member's dependent for amounts expended
because of illness or personal injury, or through the payment of premiums to a medical benefit
or health insurance program.

Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(9)-4(a) provides, generally, that no part of the net earnings of an
employees' association may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual other
than through the payment of benefits permitted by Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(9)-3.

ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION

You asked for a ruling that the proposed transfer of assets from Taxpayer to Trust will not cause
Taxpayer to fail to be exempt from tax under section 501(a) as an organization described under
section 501(c)(9).

During Year 1, Taxpayer will transfer assets to Trust to provide retiree health benefits under
Plan A. You represent that both Taxpayer and Trust are tax-exempt organizations described

Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx

under section 501(c)(9). You further represent that all of the retired employees who will be
eligible for medical benefits provided with the transferred assets currently receive basic life
insurance under the Plan A.

Accordingly, the proposed transfer of assets from Taxpayer to Trust will not cause Taxpayer to
fail to be exempt from tax under section 501(a) as an organization described under section
501(c)(9).

RULING

Based on the information submitted, representations made, and the authorities cited above, we
rule that the proposed transaction will not cause Taxpayer to fail to be exempt from tax under
section 501(a) as an organization described under section 501(c)(9).

Specifically, this ruling does not address the tax consequences of the proposed transaction to
Company B.

This ruling will be made available for public inspection under Code section 6110 after certain
deletions of identifying information are made. For details, see enclosed Notice 437, Notice of
Intention to Disclose. A copy of this ruling with deletions that we intend to make available for
public inspection is attached to Notice 437. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, you
should follow the instructions in Notice 437.

This ruling is directed only to the organization that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

This ruling is based on the facts as they were presented and on the understanding that there will
be no material changes in these facts. This ruling does not address the applicability of any
section of the Code or regulations to the facts submitted other than with respect to the sections
described. Because it could help resolve questions concerning your federal income tax status,
this ruling should be kept in your permanent records.

Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx

If you have any questions about this ruling, please contact the person whose name and
telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely,

Mary Jo Salins
Acting Manager, EO Technical

Enclosure
Notice 437

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.