Determination Letter 201512004 Released March 20, 2015 Approved Transcribed from scan

Large first-time bank grant qualifies as an unusual grant

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A publicly supported organization proposed receiving a large cash grant from a bank over five years to develop technology-based services for underserved consumers. The grant was much larger than any previous grant to the organization, and the bank had not previously contributed, controlled the organization, or had relationships with its officers or directors. The organization had an established public-support history, expected to continue attracting public support, had a representative governing body, and accepted no material restrictions from the bank. The IRS determined that the contribution was an unusual grant under the regulations. The organization therefore could exclude it when applying the public-support percentage tests described in the letter.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the organization treat the bank's proposed contribution as an unusual grant for its public-support calculation?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii), 1.507-2(a)(7), and 1.509(a)-3(c)(4)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
P. O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201

Employer Identification Number:

Number: 201512004
Release Date: 3/20/2015 Person to Contact - ID#:

Date: December 22, 2014
Contact Telephone Numbers:

LEGEND: UIL:
X = bank 509.02-02
Y = program

z = dollar amount
Dear :

We have considered your May 9, 2014 request for recognition of an unusual grant under
Treasury Regulations section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and related provisions.

Based on the information provided, we have concluded that the proposed grant constitutes an
unusual grant under section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and related provisions of the regulations. The
basis for our conclusion is set forth below.

Facts:

You submitted a grant proposal to X for a grant of z dollars, payable in cash over a five-year
period, to further your mission by founding Y in order to develop and test technology-enabled,
high-quality solutions to help underserved consumers overcome pressing challenges and
ultimately improve their financial health. No previous grant you have received approaches the
size of X’s proposed grant. Your grant agreement with X has not yet been executed.

X does not exercise control over, or within, you. You have no prior relationship with X (other
than as a prospective grantee). None of your directors or officers have a relationship with X. X is
neither a substantial contributor nor a disqualified person with respect to you. In fact, the
proposed grant will be the first contribution from X to you.

Law:

Treasury Regulations sections 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and 1.509(a)-3(c)(4) set forth the criteria for an
unusual grant.

Treasury Regulations section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) states that, for purposes of applying the 2-percent
limitation to determine whether the 33 1/3 percent-of-support test is satisfied, one or more
contributions may be excluded from both the numerator and the denominator of the applicable
percent-of-support fraction. The exclusion is generally intended to apply to substantial contributions
or bequests from disinterested parties which:

• are attracted by reason of the publicly supported nature of the organization;

• are unusual or unexpected with respect to the amount thereof; and

• would, by reason of their size, adversely affect the status of the organization as
normally being publicly supported.

Treasury Regulations section 1.509(a)-3(c)(4) states that all pertinent facts and circumstances
will be taken into consideration to determine whether a particular contribution may be excluded.
No single factor will necessarily be determinative. Such factors may include:

• Whether the contribution was made by a person who

a. created the organization

b. previously contributed a substantial part of its support or endowment

c. stood in a position of authority with respect to the organization, such as a
foundation manager within the meaning of section 4946(b)

d. directly or indirectly exercised control over the organization, or

e. was in a relationship described in Internal Revenue Code section 4946(a)(1)(C)
through 4946(a)(1)(G) with someone listed in bullets a, b, c, or d above.

A contribution made by a person described in a. - e. is ordinarily
given less favorable consideration than a contribution made by
others not described above.

• Whether the contribution was a bequest or an inter vivos transfer. A bequest will
ordinarily be given more favorable consideration than an inter vivos transfer.

• Whether the contribution was in the form of cash, readily marketable securities, or
assets which further the exempt purposes of the organization, such as a gift of a
painting to a museum.

• Whether (except in the case of a new organization) prior to the receipt of the
particular contribution, the organization (a) has carried on an actual program of
public solicitation and exempt activities and (b) has been able to attract a significant
amount of public support.

• Whether the organization may reasonably be expected to attract a significant amount
of public support after the particular contribution. Continued reliance on unusual
grants to fund an organization's current operating expenses (as opposed to providing
new endowment funds) may be evidence that the organization cannot reasonably be
expected to attract future public support.

• Whether, prior to the year in which the particular contribution was received, the
organization met the one-third support test described in section 1.509(a)-3(a)(2)
without the benefit of any exclusions of unusual grants pursuant to section 1.509-
3(c)(3);

• Whether the organization has a representative governing body as described in
Treasury Regulations section 1.509(a)-3(d)(3)(i); and

• Whether material restrictions or conditions within the meaning of Treasury
Regulations section 1.507-2(a)(7) have been imposed by the transferor upon the
transferee in connection with such transfer.

Application of Law:

The grant meets the requirements of Treasury Regulations section 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) because
the grant is from a disinterested party, and:

• The grant was attracted by reason of your publicly supported nature

• The grant is unusual or unexpected with respect to the amount

• The grant will adversely affect your status as normally being publicly supported

The grant meets the requirements of Treasury Regulations section 1.509(a)-3(c)(4) based on
the following facts and circumstances.

• The contribution was made by X, a disinterested party, in that

a. X did not create you

b. X has not previously contributed a substantial part of your support or endowment

c. X does not stand in a position of authority with respect to you

d. X does not directly or indirectly exercise control over you

e. X was not in a relationship described in Internal Revenue Code section
4946(a)(1)(c) through 4946(a)(1)(G) with someone listed in bullets a, b, c or d
above

• The contribution will be in the form of cash

• You have carried on an actual program of public solicitation and exempt activities and
have been able to attract a significant amount of public support for both 2010 and 2011

• You may reasonably be expected to attract a significant amount of public support after
the contribution

• Prior to the year in which the contribution will be received, you met the one-third support
test described in section 1.509(a)-3(a)(2) without the benefit of any exclusions of
unusual grants pursuant to section 1.509-3(c)(3). You received a significant amount of
public support in 2012

• You have a representative governing body as described in Treasury Regulations section
1.509(a)-3(d)(3)(i). You are governed by a 12-member volunteer board of directors that
have experience and expertise in microfinance, community development banking, and
financial services, and include community leaders representing a broad cross-section of
the views and interests of the community

• No material restrictions or conditions within the meaning of Treasury Regulations section
1.507-2(a)(7) have been imposed by the transferor upon the transferee in connection
with such transfer.

We have sent a copy of this letter to your representative as indicated in your power of attorney.

If you have any questions, please contact the person listed in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely,

Director, Exempt Organizations

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.