Private Letter Ruling 201511039 Released March 13, 2015 Approved Transcribed from scan

Foreign local-national employees may participate in the company's ESOP

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation whose employee stock ownership plan owned all of its single class of stock amended the plan to cover certain nonresident-alien local-national staff employees working abroad. Those employees worked directly for the company or through domestic or foreign entities represented to be disregarded for federal tax purposes, and their pay was not U.S.-source income. The IRS ruled that the company's common stock qualified as employer securities for those employees under section 409(l). Their foreign-source pay counted as compensation under section 415 even though it was excluded from U.S. gross income because of where the services were performed. The company also could deduct plan contributions for them under section 404, subject to the usual limits, but the IRS did not rule on whether the entities were disregarded or whether the employees' income was U.S.-source.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How do the employer-security, compensation, and deduction rules apply when eligible foreign local-national employees join the company's ESOP?
  • Outcome: Approved for the three addressed ruling requests
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 404(a), 409(l), 415(c), 7701, 861(a)(3), and 872; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.415(c)-2 and 301.7701-1 through -3

Full text (IRS public release)

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

U.I.L. 409.01-09
415.02-02
404.00-00

Attention:
LEGEND:
Company A =

Plan =

State C =

Covered Countries
and Territories =

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 201511039

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

DEC 17 2014

T:EP:RA:T3

2 201511039

Dear :

This is in response to your request dated March 19, 2013, submitted by
your authorized representative, as supplemented by correspondence dated April
2, 2013, April 4, 2013, June 11, 2013, September 30, 2013, February 11, 2014,
March 2, 2014, April 8, 2014, April 25, 2014, May 8, 2014, and May 24, 2014, in
which you request several rulings regarding the inclusion of certain non-resident
aliens in Company A’s employee stock ownership plan (the “Plan”).

Company A is a federal government contractor
[redacted]. Company A is an S
Corporation for federal income tax purposes.

Company A maintains the Plan, a stock bonus plan that is an employee
stock ownership plan as described in section 4975(e)(7) of the Internal Revenue
Code (“Code”). Company A has only one class of stock, 100% of which is owned
by the Plan. The Plan is a leveraged employee stock ownership plan.
Company A makes contributions and expects to pay dividends to be used by the
Plan to make payments on its loan from Company A. The Plan currently has
several hundred participants in the United States.

The Plan, as currently amended, permits certain “Local National Staff
Employees” (or “LNSEs”) to participate in the Plan beginning with the 2012 Plan
Year. This provision is an exception to the Plan’s general exclusion of non-
resident aliens with no United States source income from the employer. Under
the amendment, LNSEs who work in certain countries and territories listed on an
exhibit to the amendment (the “Covered Countries and Territories”) would be
eligible to participate in the Plan. LNSEs who work in any of the Covered
Countries and Territories are referred to in this ruling as “Eligible LNSEs.”

The Plan defines an LNSE as an employee (as defined in the Plan) who
(a) is not a United States citizen or in possession of an Alien Registration Card
issued by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, (b) performs services
almost entirely outside the United States, and (c) is:

(1) employed directly by the Company or

(2) is hired locally in the foreign country and is employed by the
Company either through

(a) a domestic or foreign entity owned by the Company and that
is treated as a “disregarded entity” pursuant to Treas. Reg.
Sec. 301.7701-1(a)(4);

(b) a branch office; or

3 201511039

(c) a local hiring office.

You represent that all of the Eligible LNSEs either:

(i) are employed by Company A, and paid wages either directly by
Company A or through a payroll agency in the local jurisdiction;

(ii) are employed by a State C limited liability company that is a
disregarded entity under section 7701 of the Code; or

(iii) are paid by a local entity that is a foreign eligible entity that has
elected to be a “disregarded entity” under section 7701 of the Code.

You further represent that the Eligible LNSEs do not receive United States
sourced income subject to tax in the United States under section 861(a)(3) of the
Code.

As previously discussed with you, ruling requests number 3 and 5, as
numbered in your letter dated March 19, 2013, are not being addressed in this
ruling.

Based on the foregoing facts and representations, your authorized
representatives have requested the following rulings:

  1. The common stock of Company A, which constitutes its only class of
    outstanding stock, will qualify as “employer securities” under section 409(l) of the
    Code with respect to the LNSEs, all of whom are either employees of Company
    A or employees of one of the entities referenced herein that is treated as a
    “disregarded entity” pursuant to the Treasury Regulations promulgated under
    section 7701.

  2. The compensation paid to LNSEs that is foreign sourced will be
    treated as “compensation” under section 415(c) of the Code.

  3. The Company may deduct under section 404(a) of the Code the
    contributions it makes to the Plan on behalf of all individuals who are LNSEs and
    the compensation paid to such LNSEs will constitute “compensation” for
    purposes of the tax deduction limits of Code section 404(a).

With respect to Ruling Request 1, section 409(l)(1) of the Code defines
the term “employer securities” as common stock issued by the employer (or by a
corporation that is a member of the same controlled group) which is readily
tradable on an established securities market.

4 201511039

Section 409(l)(2) of the Code provides that if there is no common stock
which meets the requirements of paragraph (1), the term “employer securities”
means common stock issued by the employer (or by a corporation which is a
member of the same controlled group) having a combination of voting power and
dividend rights equal to or in excess of:

(a) that class of common stock of the employer (or of any other such
corporation) having the greatest voting power, and

(b) that class of common stock of the employer (or of any other such
corporation) having the greatest dividend rights.

Section 301.7701-1 of the Income Tax Regulations (the “Regulations”)
prescribes the classification of various organizations for federal tax purposes.
Whether an organization is an entity separate from its owners for federal tax
purposes is a matter of federal tax law and does not depend on whether the
organization is recognized as an entity under local law.

Section 301.7701-2(a) of the Regulations provides that for purposes of
this section and section 301.7701-3, a business entity with only one owner is
classified as a corporation or is disregarded; if the entity is disregarded, its
activities are treated in the same manner as a sole proprietorship, branch, or
division of the owner.

In this case, you have represented that the stock of Company A held by
the Plan is the only class of stock outstanding, and therefore meets the dividend
and voting rights requirements of section 409(l) of the Code.

You have further represented that all of the Eligible LNSEs are employed
either (a) directly by Company A, (b) by a domestic LLC that is treated as a
disregarded entity for tax purposes pursuant to section 301.7701-3(b)(1) of the
Regulations, or (c) by a foreign entity that is treated as a disregarded entity under
section 301.7701-3(b)(2)(i) of the Regulations.

Under the represented facts, the Eligible LNSEs are all employed either by
Company A, or by an entity owned by Company A that is a “disregarded entity”
under section 301.7701 of the Code. To the extent that these disregarded
entities have no separate existence for federal income tax purposes, each
disregarded entity would be treated as a division of Company A for income tax
purposes.

Accordingly, based on your representations, including the representation
that the common stock of Company A otherwise meets the requirements of
section 409(l)(2) of the Code, we conclude that the common stock of Company A
qualifies as “employer securities” under section 409(l) of the Code with respect to
the Eligible LNSEs.

5 201511039

With respect to Ruling Request 2, section 415(a) of the Code provides
that a trust which is part of a pension, profit sharing, or stock bonus plan shall not
constitute a qualified trust if it provides for contributions to a defined contribution
plan with respect to a participant which exceed the limitation of subsection (c) of
such section.

Section 415(c) of the Code provides that contributions and other additions
with respect to a participant, when expressed as an annual addition, may not
exceed the greater of (a) a specified dollar amount (adjusted annually for cost of
living increases pursuant to section 415(d)), or (b) 100 percent of the participant's
compensation.

Section 861(a)(3) of the Code defines income from sources within the
United States as including compensation for labor or personal services
performed in the United States (with exceptions for services performed in the
United States that meet certain conditions).

Section 872(a) of the Code provides that in the case of a non-resident
alien individual, gross income includes only (1) gross income which is derived
from sources within the United States and which is not effectively connected with
the conduct of a trade or business within the United States, and (2) gross income
which is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the
United States.

Section 1.415(c)-2(c)(1) of the Regulations provides that for purposes of
the limitation in section 415 of the Code, “compensation” includes the employee's
wages, salaries, fees for professional services, and any other amount received
for personal services actually rendered in the course of employment with the
employer maintaining the plan, to the extent that the amounts are includible in
gross income (or would have been received and includible in gross income but
for an election under section 125(a), 132(f)(4), 402(e)(3), 402(h)(1)(B), 402(k), or
457(b)).

Section 1.415(c)-2(c)(4) of the Regulations provides that “compensation”
does not include amounts that receive special tax benefits, such as premiums for
group-term life insurance (but only to the extent that the premiums are not
includible in the gross income of the employee and are not salary reduction
amounts described in section 125).

Section 1.415(c)-2(g)(5)(i) of the Regulations provides that amounts paid
to an individual as compensation for personal services do not fail to be treated as
compensation under paragraph (b)(1) of such section (and are not excluded from
the definition of compensation pursuant to paragraph (c)(4) of such section)
merely because those amounts are not includible in the individual’s gross income
on account of the location of the services.

6 201511039

Similarly, section 1.415(c)-2(g)(5)(i) of the Regulations provides that
compensation for services does not fail to be treated as compensation under
paragraph (b)(1) (and is not excluded from the definition of compensation
pursuant to paragraph (c)(4) of such section) merely because those amounts are
paid by an employer with respect to which all compensation paid to the
participant by such employer is excluded from gross income. Thus, for example,
the determination of whether an amount is treated as compensation under
paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of such section is made without regard to the exclusions
from gross income under section 872, 873, 894, 911, 931, and 939.

In this case, the Plan defines an LNSE as including only individuals who
perform services almost entirely outside the United States, and you have
represented that the Eligible LNSEs do not receive United States sourced
income subject to tax in the United States under section 861(a)(3) of the Code.
Section 872(a) of the Code addresses whether compensation of a non-resident
alien that is not United States sourced income is excluded from gross income.

Under section 1.415(c)-2(g)(5)(i) of the Regulations, an employee’s
compensation for services does not fail to be included as compensation for
purposes of section 415 of the Code merely because such compensation is
excluded from gross income on the basis of the location of the services, such as
under section 872 of the Code. Such compensation is not compensation that
receives special tax benefits, such as premiums for group term life insurance, as
described in section 1.415(c)-2(c)(4) of the regulations.

Accordingly, based on the representations described above, we conclude
that the amounts paid to an Eligible LNSE from Company A or from the
disregarded entities as compensation for personal services is treated as
“compensation” for purposes of section 415 of the Code, regardless of whether
such compensation is excluded from the Eligible LNSE’s gross income based on
the location of the services, assuming it otherwise meets the requirements of
section 415(c).

With respect to ruling request 3, section 404(a)(3)(A)(i) of the Code
provides that contributions by an employer to a stock bonus or profit-sharing trust
are deductible in the taxable year in which paid, if such taxable year ends within
or with a taxable year of the trust with respect to which the trust is exempt under
section 501(a), in an amount not in excess of the greater of:

(a) 25 percent of the compensation otherwise paid or accrued during the
taxable year to the beneficiaries under the stock bonus or profit-sharing
plan, or

(b) the amount such employer is required to contribute to such trust under
section 401(k)(11) for such year.

7 201511039

In this case, you have represented that the entities that employ the Eligible
LNSEs are disregarded entities under section 301.7701-2(a) of the Regulations,
and thus are treated for tax purposes as unincorporated divisions of Company A.
In addition, as discussed earlier, we have concluded that the amounts paid to
such employees as compensation for personal services constitutes
“compensation” for purposes of section 415 of the Code.

Accordingly, we conclude that Company A may deduct under section
404(a) the contributions it makes to the Plan on behalf of participants who are
Eligible LNSEs, subject to the limitations on deductions and other generally
applicable conditions for such deductions. In addition, we conclude that the
compensation paid to such participating LNSEs will constitute “compensation” for
purposes of the deduction limits of Code section 404(a).

This ruling letter is based on the assumption that the Plan is otherwise
qualified under Code sections 401(a) and 4975(e)(7) at all relevant times.

This letter does not constitute a ruling on whether any entity owned by
Company A is a disregarded entity under section 301.7701 of the Code or
whether income received by Eligible LNSEs is or is not United States source
income within the meaning of section 861(a)(3) of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section
6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as
precedent.

A copy of this ruling letter has been sent to your authorized representative
in accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact [redacted] (ID
[redacted]) at ([redacted]) [redacted]-[redacted]. Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T3.

Sincerely yours,

Laura B. Warshawsky, Manager,
Employee Plans Technical Group 3

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.