Prior-year resolution may support TEFRA disclosure

Number
201509032
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Use of Information in Judicial or Administrative Nontax Proceedings
Code sections
§ 6103
Ruling dated
January 9, 2015
Publicly released
February 27, 2015

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel explained that each tax year is a separate cause of action. When the partners differ, the IRS generally requires a separate final partnership administrative adjustment for each year to avoid disclosure problems. The email nevertheless concluded that section 6103(h)(4)(B) probably permitted the disclosure because the first year's resolution conclusively established the second year's treatment.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can information from one TEFRA year be used when it conclusively establishes the treatment for another year?
  • Outcome: Advice given, likely yes under the cited disclosure exception
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6103(h)(4)(B)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2015010914091301 [Third Party Communication:

UILC: 6103.09-03
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]

Number: 201509032
Release Date: 2/27/2015
From:
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 2:09:13 PM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: TEFRA/disclosure question

Each year is a separate cause of action . Because of this we require separate FPAA’s
for each year when the partners are not the same in order to avoid disclosure issues.
But you are probably O.K. under section 6103(h)(4)(B) since the year 1 resolution
conclusively establishes year 2 treatment.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace