Chief Counsel Advice 201509032 Released February 27, 2015 Advice

Prior-year resolution may support TEFRA disclosure

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel explained that each tax year is a separate cause of action. When the partners differ, the IRS generally requires a separate final partnership administrative adjustment for each year to avoid disclosure problems. The email nevertheless concluded that section 6103(h)(4)(B) probably permitted the disclosure because the first year's resolution conclusively established the second year's treatment.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can information from one TEFRA year be used when it conclusively establishes the treatment for another year?
  • Outcome: Advice given, likely yes under the cited disclosure exception
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6103(h)(4)(B)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2015010914091301 [Third Party Communication:

UILC: 6103.09-03 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]

Number: 201509032
Release Date: 2/27/2015
From:
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 2:09:13 PM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: TEFRA/disclosure question

Each year is a separate cause of action . Because of this we require separate FPAA’s
for each year when the partners are not the same in order to avoid disclosure issues.
But you are probably O.K. under section 6103(h)(4)(B) since the year 1 resolution
conclusively establishes year 2 treatment.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.