Determination Letter 201506016 Released February 6, 2015 Denied Transcribed from scan

Self-directed real estate plan does not justify late IRA rollover

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An IRA owner took two distributions and used them to buy real estate that he intended to place in a self-directed IRA. Although he hired several professionals, he personally orchestrated the transaction and did not realize until after the 60-day deadline that the property had not been placed in an IRA. He also cited medical treatment as a factor that reduced his ability to manage the transaction, but he continued working and handling other affairs. The IRS found that he had not provided adequate documentation showing that an error, disability, hospitalization, or another factor recognized in Revenue Procedure 2003-16 caused the missed deadline. It declined to waive the 60-day rollover requirement for both distributions.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the IRS waive the 60-day IRA rollover deadline for distributions used to buy real estate intended for a self-directed IRA?
  • Outcome: Denied for insufficient evidence that a qualifying circumstance caused the delay
  • Key authorities: IRC § 408(d)(3); Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 201506016

NOV 14 2014

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00 SE:T:EP:RA:T2

XXXXX

XXXXX

XXXXX

Legend:

Taxpayer = XXXXX

IRA = XXXXX
XXXXX

Amount 1 = XXXXX

Amount 2 = XXXXX

Dear XXXXX:

This is in response to your letter dated September 18, 2013, as
supplemented by correspondence dated April 2, 2014, April 4, 2014 and May 27,
2014 in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained
in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under
penalty of perjury in support of the ruling requested.

Taxpayer represents that on February 1, 2013 and February 6, 2013, he
received distributions of Amount 1 and Amount 2 respectively, from IRA.
Taxpayer used Amount 1 and Amount 2 to buy a real estate investment property
which he intended to place in a self-directed IRA. Taxpayer asserts that his
failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period prescribed by section
408(d)(3) of the Code was due to confusion surrounding the structure of the
transaction, and Taxpayer’s medical condition which diminished his ability to
maintain his finances.

201506016

Taxpayer represents that he took distributions of Amount 1 and Amount 2,
with the intention of using the money to purchase real estate property and place
it into an IRA. To this end, Taxpayer represents that he hired a Certified Public
Accountant, attorney, financial advisor and realtor to help him with the
transaction. However, Taxpayer represents that he, and not one of his
professional advisors orchestrated the transaction. Taxpayer did not realize until
after the 60-day rollover period expired that that the property had not been
placed into an IRA.

Around the time Taxpayer purchased the real estate property, Taxpayer
was undergoing treatment for an illness. Taxpayer attributes this treatment as a
contributing factor for his inability to adequately manage his finances and this
transaction. During this time, Taxpayer continued to maintain employment and
handle his other affairs.

Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the
Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) waive the 60-day rollover requirement
contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Code with respect to the distribution of
Amount.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided
in section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included
in gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner
provided under section 72.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to
IRA rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) does not
apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose
benefit the IRA is maintained if

(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after
the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such
individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or
distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into
such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible
in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3)).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not
apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual
from an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such

201506016

receipt such individual received any other amount described in section
408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of
the application of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period
for partial rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of
section 408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under
section 408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive
the 60-day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) where the
failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience,
including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the
individual subject to such requirement.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 provides that in determining
whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section
408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and
circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2)
inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization,
incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the
use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check,
whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution
occurred.

The Service has the authority to waive the 60-day rollover requirement for
a distribution from an IRA where the individual failed to complete a rollover to
another IRA within the 60-day rollover period but was prevented from doing so
because of one of the factors enumerated in Rev. Proc. 2003-16, for example,
errors committed by a financial institution, death, hospitalization, postal error,
incarceration, and/or disability. Taxpayer has failed to provide adequate
documentation that any of the factors enumerated in Rev. Proc. 2003-16 resulted
in his failure to complete a timely rollover.

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service
hereby declines to waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the
distribution of Amount 1 and Amount 2 from IRA.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction
described herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or
regulations which may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section
6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

201506016
Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this

letter ruling is being sent to your authorized representative.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact XXXXX at XXX-
XXX-XXXXX. Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T2.

Sincerely yours,

~~

Jason E. Levine, Manager,
Employee Plans Technical Group 2

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

XXXXX
XXXXX

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.