Determination Letter 201505039 Released January 30, 2015 Denied Transcribed from scan

Medical fundraising for one child serves private interests

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An organization sought retroactive reinstatement of its IRC § 501(c)(3) exemption after losing its prior exemption for failing to file Form 990 for three consecutive years. Although its articles referred broadly to helping families with children who had serious medical needs, all of its assistance had gone to one preselected child, and the organization was named for that child. More than half of its fundraising proceeds paid the child's medical expenses, and there was no formal application or selection process for other beneficiaries. The IRS found that adding unrelated board members did not change the organization's operation for the private benefit of the child and her family. It denied exemption because the organization served private rather than public or charitable interests.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did fundraising for one preselected child's medical expenses satisfy the operational test under IRC § 501(c)(3)?
  • Outcome: Denied
  • Key authorities: IRC § 501(c)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1), 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1), and 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii); Rev. Ruls. 67-367 and 76-206

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
TEGE Appeals Programs CERTIFIED

300 N. Los Angeles Street

Los Angeles, CA 90012

Release Number: 201505039
Release Date: 1/30/2015
Date: 10/22/2014

Redaction legend:

A=
B=
C=
A Taxpayer Identification Number:
B Person to Contact:
Employee ID Number: *
Tel: (
Fax: ***
Refer Reply to:


In Re: Exempt status
Tax Years: 12/31/**** and subsequent
years
UIL Index:
501.03-00
Dear

This is a final adverse determination to your application for exempt status under
section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code as an organization described under
section 501(c)(3). Our adverse determination was made for the following reason(s):

Treas. Reg. section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii) provides that an organization is not
operated exclusively for exempt purposes unless it serves a public rather than a private
interest. You operated for the benefit of private interests of a particular and specified
individual.

As such, you failed to meet the requirements of I.R.C. section 501(c)(3) and
Treasury Regulation section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii) in that you have not demonstrated

that you are operated exclusively for exempt purposes within the meaning of Internal
Revenue Code section 501(c)(3).

Contributions to your organization are not deductible under Code § 170. You are
required to file federal Form 1120 for the year(s) shown above.

If you decide to contest this determination under the declaratory judgment
provisions of Code section 7428, a petition to the United States Tax Court, the United
States Court of Claims, or the district court of the United States for the District of
Columbia must be filed before the 91st (ninety-first) day after the date this determination
was mailed to you. Contact the clerk of the appropriate court for rules for filing petitions
for declaratory judgment. To secure a petition form from the United States Tax Court,
write to the United States Tax Court, 400 Second Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20217.

You also have the right to contact the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate. However,
you should first contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown
above since this person can access your tax information and can help you get answers.
You can call 1-877-777-4778, and ask for Taxpayer Advocate assistance.

Taxpayer Advocate assistance cannot be used as a substitute for established
IRS procedures, formal appeals procedures, etc. The Taxpayer Advocate is not able to
reverse legal or technically correct tax determinations, or extend the time fixed by law
that you have to file a petition in the United States Tax Court. The Taxpayer Advocate,
can however, see that a tax matter, that may not have been resolved through normal
channels, gets prompt and proper handling.

We will notify the appropriate State officials of this final adverse determination of
your exempt status, as required by Code section 6104(c).

If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone
number are shown in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely,

Shari Kolnicki
acting Appeals Team Manager

cc:

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES

DIVISION

Date: [illegible]/9/14
Contact Person:
Identification Number:
Contact Number:
FAX Number:
Employer Identification Number:

LEGEND: UIL:

P = Name 501.00-00

Q = Date 501.32-00

S = Name

Z = Name

Dear

We have considered your application for recognition of exemption from federal income
tax under Internal Revenue Code section 501(a). Based on the information provided,
we have concluded that you do not qualify for exemption under Code section 501(c)(3).
The basis for our conclusion is set forth below.

Issue(s)

Do you qualify for exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Code? No, for the reasons
described below.

Facts

You were previously granted exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Your
exemption was revoked due to the non-filing of Form 990 for three consecutive years.
Accordingly, you submitted this new Form 1023, application for exemption for
retroactive reinstatement.

You were incorporated as a nonprofit corporation on date Q in the State of P.

Your Articles of Incorporation state your specific purpose is to assist families with
children born with physical handicaps and/or medical conditions with their extraordinary
education, medical, and health care expenses.

Since your formation, you have only raised money for Z to pay her medical expenses
such as specialized treatments, medical equipment and therapy. For example, you have
paid for three heart surgeries, numerous cranial sacral treatments, and numerous
prescriptions. You indicated you were founded by caring members in your community
unrelated to Z, who were aware of her abnormal case history and the circumstances
surrounding her medical care and health including her tremendous will to survive. You
are even named for Z.

You have held numerous fundraising events such as golf outings and a casino night on
behalf of Z. Her photo appears prominently on each of the fundraising flyers as well as
her history. Over one half your gross receipts from these events were provided for Z’s
medical expenses. Moreover, there had been no application process for requesting
funding.

For the last several years, you had only one active board member and sole officer, S,

who reviewed the medical documentation for Z’s expenses and signed all the checks. S

is a family friend. You also wrote there was no bias in paying her expenses and funds

were reimbursements to Z’s family for treatments already paid for. Furthermore, board

members and their relatives are not eligible to receive funds You have since expanded
your board by adding four unrelated individuals.

Law

Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) provides for the exemption
from federal income tax of organizations organized and operated exclusively for
charitable, educational and other purposes, including the prevention of cruelty to
children or animals provided that no part of the net earnings inure to the benefit of any
private shareholder or individual.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) of the regulations provides that, in order to be exempt as an
organization described in section 501(c)(3), an organization must be both organized and
operated exclusively for one or more of the purposes specified in such section. If an
organization fails to meet either the organizational test or the operational test, it is not
exempt.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) of the regulations provides that an organization will be
regarded as “operated exclusively” for one or more exempt purposes only if it engages
primarily in activities that accomplish one or more of such exempt purposes specified in
section 501(c)(3). An organization will not be so regarded if more than an insubstantial
part of its activities is not in furtherance of an exempt purpose.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an organization
is not organized or operated exclusively for an exempt purpose unless it serves a public
rather than a private interest. The organization must demonstrate that it is not organized or
operated for the benefit of private interests such as designated individuals, the creator or
his family, shareholders of the organization, or persons controlled directly or indirectly by
such private interests.

Revenue Ruling 67-367, 1967-2 CB 188 describes a nonprofit organization whose sole
activity was the operation of a ‘scholarship’ plan for making payments to pre-selected,
specifically named individuals. The organization did not qualify for exemption from
federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Code because it was serving private
rather than public or charitable interests.

Revenue Ruling 76-206, 1976-1 C.B. 154 describes a nonprofit organization formed to
generate community interest in the retention of classical music programs by a local for-
profit radio station by conducting activities that increased the station's revenues; the
organization had a broad community board; however, the organization was found to be
serving a private rather than a public interest and did not qualify for exemption from
federal income tax under Section 501(c)3).

In Wendy L. Parker Rehabilitation Foundation, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1986-
348, the tax court upheld the Service's position that a foundation formed to aid coma
victims, including a family member of the founders, was not entitled to recognition of
exemption. Approximately 30% of the organization's net income was expected to be
distributed to aid the family coma victim. The distribution of funds from the foundation
were for the medical and rehabilitative care of Wendy Parker, and this was to relieve the
Parker family of the economic burden of providing such care.

Application of Law

You are not described in section 501(c)(3) of the Code because you fail the operational
test as per Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) of the regulations.

You are not described in Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) of the regulations because you are
operating for the non-exempt private purpose of raising funds to pay for a preselected
person’s medical expenses.

You are not described in Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Regulations
because you are operating for private interests rather than public interests. Your
activities have only benefited Z. For example:

  • You have only provided financial assistance to Z.
  • Over one half of the gross proceeds have been used for Z’s medical expenses.

  • You have no formal application process or selection process for requesting
    assistance.

You are like the organization described in Revenue Ruling 67-367 because you were
formed and are operated to benefit a preselected individual. Your fundraising materials
illustrate this by showing a prominent picture of Z and her history. These materials also
show the proceeds were to be used for her medical expenses. The fact that you are
named after Z also substantiates you were formed to benefit a preselected, designated
individual which shows you are serving private interests precluding exemption under
Section 501(c)(3).

You are similar to the organization described in Revenue Ruling 76-206 because you
are not serving public or charitable interests. You are fundraising on Z’s behalf to pay her
medical expenses and over one half of your gross proceeds have been used to pay for
Z’s medical expenses. Although your board is unrelated to Z and her family, this does
not change the fact that you are serving substantial private interests.

You are similar to the organization described in the court case Wendy L. Parker
Rehabilitation Foundation , because you were formed to pay the medical expenses for a
preselected individual. Like this organization, you are serving the private benefit of an
individual and her family by paying her medical expenses and relieving her family of
their financial obligation by providing such care.

Applicant’s Position

You state that you were formed to help Z and other children with special medical needs
from the community. Your fundraising efforts have been affected by the downturn in the
economy, and you are hoping to eventually reach out to other children with special
needs. However, to date, Z has been the sole beneficiary of your fundraising efforts.

Service’s Response to Applicant’s Position

You failed to provide any additional information from which it can be concluded that you
are operating exclusively for 501(c)(3) purposes. You are operating for the benefit of a
designated individual as described in the preceding facts and analysis and are serving
private interests rather than public interests. This precludes exemption under Section
501(c)(3).

Conclusion
You do not qualify for tax-exemption under IRC section 501(c)(3) because you were

formed and have operated to raise funds for the benefit of a designated individual.
You therefore are serving a private rather than a public or charitable interest.

You have the right to file a protest if you believe this determination is incorrect. To
protest, you must submit a protest statement explaining your views and reasoning. You
must submit the protest statement, signed by one of your officers, within 30 days from
the date of this letter. We will consider your statement and decide if the information
affects our determination. If your protest statement does not provide a basis to
reconsider our determination, we will forward your case to our Appeals Office. You can
find more information about the role of the Appeals Office in Publication 892.

Types of information that should be included in your protest statement can be found in
Publication 892. The protest statement must be accompanied by the following
declaration:

“Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this protest statement,
including accompanying documents and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the
statement contains all relevant facts and such facts are true, correct, and complete.”

Your protest will be considered incomplete without this statement.

If an organization's representative submits the protest, a substitute declaration must be
included stating that the representative prepared the protest and accompanying
documents; and whether the representative knows personally that the statements of
facts contained in the protest and accompanying documents are true and correct.

An attorney, certified public accountant, or an individual enrolled to practice before the
Internal Revenue Service may represent you during the appeal process. If you want
representation during the appeal process, you must file a proper power of attorney,
Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, if you have not
already done so. You can find more information about representation in Publication
947, Practice Before the IRS and Power of Attorney. All forms and publications
mentioned in this letter can be found at www.irs.gov, Forms and Publications.

If you do not file a protest within 30 days, you will not be able to file a suit for declaratory
judgment in court because the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will consider the failure
to appeal as a failure to exhaust available administrative remedies. Code section
7428(b)(2) provides, in part, that a declaratory judgment or decree shall not be issued in
any proceeding unless the Tax Court, the United States Court of Federal Claims, or the
District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia determines that the
organization involved has exhausted all of the administrative remedies available to it
within the IRS.

If you do not intend to protest this determination, you do not need to take any further
action. If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will issue a final adverse
determination letter. That letter will provide information about filing tax returns and other
matters.

Please send your protest statement, Form 2848, and any supporting documents to the
applicable address:

Mail to: Deliver to:
Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service
EO Determinations Quality Assurance EO Determinations Quality Assurance
Room 7-008 550 Main Street, Room 7-008
P.O. Box 2508 Cincinnati, OH 45202

Cincinnati, OH 45201
You may fax your statement using the fax number shown in the heading of this letter. If
you fax your statement, please call the person identified in the heading of this letter to
confirm that he or she received your fax.

If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone
number are shown in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely,

Director, Exempt Organizations

Enclosure: Publication 892

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.