Acquired subsidiaries may adopt tax book value for interest allocation
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A domestic parent corporation had long used the tax book value method to value assets for allocating and apportioning interest expense. After it merged with another consolidated-group parent, the acquired subsidiaries joined its group but had previously used the fair market value method. The IRS authorized those subsidiaries to change to the tax book value method beginning when they became members of the acquiring parent's group. The approval applies for all operative sections and later taxable years. A copy of the ruling must be attached to each relevant return, or an electronic filer may attach a statement identifying the ruling's date and control number.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could acquired subsidiaries change from fair market value to tax book value for apportioning interest expense?
- Outcome: Approved, beginning when the subsidiaries joined the acquiring consolidated group
- Key authorities: IRC § 864(e); Treas. Reg. § 1.861-8(f)(2); Temp. Treas. Reg. §§ 1.861-8T(c)(2) and 1.861-9T(g)(1)(ii)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201505036 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 1/30/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 861.09-00, 861.09-06,
861.09-07 Person To Contact:
---------------------, ID No. ------------------
-------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
------------------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
-------------------------------------------------- CC:INTL:B03
-------------------------- PLR-134390-14
Date:
October 22, 2014
TY: -------
Legend
Corp X = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Corp Y = ----------------------
Date 1 = ----------------------------
Dear ----------------:
This is in response to your representative’s letter dated September 12, 2014, requesting
a ruling on behalf of Corp X that Corp Y’s pre-acquisition subsidiaries (the Corp Y Subs)
be permitted to change from the fair market value method to the tax book value method
of asset valuation for purposes of apportioning interest expense.
The ruling contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by Corp X’s representative and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party of Corp X. While this office has not verified
any of the material submitted in support of the request for ruling, it is subject to
verification on examination.
Corp X, a domestic corporation that uses the accrual method as its overall method of
accounting, is the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations (the Corp X
Group) that file a consolidated federal income tax return on a calendar year basis. Corp
X elected the tax book value method of asset valuation more than 10 years prior to Date
1 and has consistently applied the tax book value method since its initial election year.
PLR-134390-14 2
On Date 1, Corp X merged with Corp Y, the common parent of a U.S. consolidated
group of corporations. As a result of the merger, the Corp Y Subs became members of
the Corp X Group and will be included in Corp X’s consolidated federal income tax
return starting from the day after Date 1. For more than 5 years prior to Date 1, Corp Y
and its subsidiaries had used the fair market value method of asset valuation.
Section 864(e) provides that all allocations and apportionments of interest expense shall
be made on the basis of assets rather than gross income. Treas. Reg. §§1.861-8
through 1.861-12 and Temp. Treas. Reg. §§1.861-8T through 1.861-13T set forth the
rules specific to the allocation and apportionment of interest expense. Temp. Treas.
Reg. §1.861-9T(g)(1)(ii) provides that a taxpayer may elect to determine the value of its
assets on the basis of either the tax book value or the fair market value of its assets.
Temp. Treas. Reg. §1.861-8T(c)(2) provides that, once a taxpayer uses the fair market
value method, the taxpayer and all related persons must continue to use that method
unless expressly authorized by the Commissioner to change methods.
Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, pursuant to
Treas. Reg. §1.861-8(f)(2) and Temp. Treas. Reg. §§1.861-8T(c)(2) and 1.861-
9T(g)(1)(ii), the Corp Y Subs may change from the fair market value method to the tax
book value method of assets valuation for purposes of apportioning interest expense for
all operative sections, starting from the time the Corp Y Subs became members of the
Corp X Group and for all subsequent taxable years.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.
This ruling is directed only to Corp X and the Corp Y Subs. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.
PLR-134390-14 3
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.
Sincerely,
Richard L. Chewning
Senior Counsel, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(International)
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.