Consolidated group may make a late bonus-depreciation election

Plain-English summary

An affiliated group did not claim additional first-year depreciation for any class of qualified property on its timely consolidated return. Its in-house tax team nevertheless failed to attach the statement required to elect out of bonus depreciation because it expected the return software to carry the prior-year election forward automatically. The IRS found that the group met the requirements for discretionary relief. It granted 60 calendar days to file an amended consolidated return with a statement electing out of the additional first-year deduction under IRC § 168(k)(1) and (k)(5) for all qualified-property classes placed in service that year. The ruling did not decide whether any particular property was otherwise eligible for bonus depreciation.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Could the consolidated group make a late election not to claim additional first-year depreciation?
• Outcome: Approved, with 60 days to file an amended consolidated return
• Key authorities: IRC § 168(k); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.168(k)-1(e), 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3; Rev. Procs. 2008-54 and 2011-26

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201505002 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 1/30/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.04-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------ --------------------------------, ID No. ----------
--------------------------------- ------------------
--------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------------------------------- ----------------------
------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B07
PLR-113019-14
Date:
September 18, 2014

Re: Request for Extension of Time to Make the Election Not to Deduct the Additional
First Year Depreciation

Legend

Parent = ---------------------------------------------------

S1 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------

S2 = ----------------------------------------------------------

S3 = -------------------------------------

S4 = -----------------------------------------------------------------

S5 = ---------------------------------------------------------------

S6 = ----------------------------------------------------

S7 = ---------------------------------------------

Date 1 = ----------------------------

A = -------

B = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PLR-113019-14 2

Dear ------------------:

   This letter responds to a letter dated March 24, 2014, submitted by Parent on

behalf of itself and S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7 (hereinafter “Taxpayer”), requesting an
extension of time pursuant to § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations to make the election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation
under § 168(k)(1) and (k)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code for all classes of qualified
property placed in service by Taxpayer during the taxable year ended Date 1 (the A
taxable year).

FACTS

    Taxpayer represents that the facts are as follows:

   Taxpayer is part of an affiliated group that joins in filing a consolidated federal

income tax return on a fiscal year basis. Taxpayer’s consolidated federal income tax
return for the A taxable year was timely filed. The period of limitation on assessment
under § 6501(a) for the A taxable year has not expired as of the date of this letter.

  Taxpayer is a B. Taxpayer placed in service qualified property (as defined in §

168(k)(2)) during the A taxable year.

   On Parent’s timely filed consolidated federal income tax return for the A taxable

year, Taxpayer did not claim the additional first year depreciation deduction for any
classes of qualified property placed in service by Taxpayer during that taxable year.
Taxpayer, however, inadvertently failed to attach the election statement not to claim the
additional first year depreciation deduction for all classes of qualified property placed in
service by Taxpayer, as required by § 1.168(k)-1(e)(3)(ii) of the Income Tax
Regulations, to the consolidated federal income tax return for the A taxable year.

     For the A taxable year, Taxpayer’s consolidated federal income tax return was

prepared in house. The Taxpayer’s tax managers inadvertently failed to include the
required election statement not to claim the additional first year depreciation deduction
for all classes of qualified property placed in service by Taxpayer, as required by §
1.168(k)-1(e)(3)(ii) of the Income Tax Regulations, because it was thought that the tax
return preparation software used to prepare the A consolidated federal income tax
return would automatically rollover the required election from the prior year return. The
missing election statement was not detected while reviewing the Taxpayer’s A
consolidated federal income tax return.

  Taxpayer did not make the election under § 168(k)(4) to accelerate alternative

minimum tax credits (and if applicable, research credits) in lieu of the additional first-
year depreciation deduction for any class of property placed in service for any taxable
year.

PLR-113019-14 3

    In Date 2, Taxpayer’s new tax manager discovered that the required election

statement not to claim the additional first year depreciation deduction for all classes of
qualified property placed in service by Taxpayer, as required by § 1.168(k)-1(e)(3)(ii),
was not attached to the A consolidated federal income tax return

RULING REQUESTED

   Taxpayer requests a ruling pursuant to § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and

Administration Regulations that it be granted an extension of time to make the election
not to deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k)(1) or (k)(5) for all
classes of qualified property placed in service by Taxpayer during the A taxable year.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

   Section 168(k)(1) provides a 50-percent additional first year depreciation

deduction for the placed-in-service year for qualified property (i) acquired by a taxpayer
after December 31, 2007, and before September 9, 2010, or acquired by a taxpayer
generally after December 31, 2011, and (ii) placed in service by the taxpayer before
January 1, 2014 (or January 1, 2015, for qualified property described in § 168(k)(2)(B)
or (C)).

   Section 168(k)(5) provides a 100-percent additional first year depreciation

deduction for the placed-in-service year for qualified property acquired by a taxpayer
after September 8, 2010, and generally before January 1, 2012, and placed in service
by the taxpayer before January 1, 2012 (or January 1, 2013, for qualified property
described in § 168(k)(2)(B) or (C)). See section 3 of Rev. Proc. 2011-26, 2011-16 I.R.B.
664, 665.

    Section 168(k)(2)(D)(iii) provides that a taxpayer may elect not to deduct the

additional first year depreciation for any class of property placed in service during the
taxable year. The term “class of property” is defined in § 1.168(k)-1(e)(2) as meaning,
in general, each class of property described in § 168(e) (for example, 5-year property).
See section 5.01 of Rev. Proc. 2008-54, 2008-2 C.B. 722, and section 3.01 of Rev.
Proc. 2011-26, 2011-16 I.R.B. at 665 (rules similar to the rules in § 1.168(k)-1 for
“qualified property” or for “30-percent additional first year depreciation deduction” apply
for purposes of § 168(k) as currently in effect).

   Section 1.168(k)-1(e)(1) provides that the election not to deduct additional first

year depreciation for a class of property applies to all qualified property that is in that
class of property and placed in service in the same taxable year.

PLR-113019-14 4

   Section 1.168(k)-1(e)(3)(i) provides that the election not to deduct additional first

year depreciation must be made by the due date (including extensions) of the federal
tax return for the taxable year in which the property is placed in service by the taxpayer.

   Section 1.168(k)-1(e)(3)(ii) provides that the election not to deduct additional first

year depreciation must be made in the manner prescribed on Form 4562, “Depreciation
and Amortization,” and its instructions. The instructions to Form 4562 for the A taxable
year provided that the election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation is
made by attaching a statement to the taxpayer's timely filed tax return (including
extensions) indicating that the taxpayer is electing not to deduct the additional first year
depreciation and the class of property for which the taxpayer is making the election.

   Under § 301.9100-1, the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable

extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a
regulatory election.

   Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the

Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do
not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

    Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be

granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

CONCLUSION

    Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that the

requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly,
Taxpayer is granted 60 calendar days from the date of this letter to make the election
not to deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k)(1) and (k)(5) for all
classes of property placed in service by Taxpayer during the A taxable year that qualify
for the additional first year depreciation deduction. This election must be made by
Parent filing an amended consolidated federal income tax return for the A taxable year,
with a statement indicating that Taxpayer is electing not to deduct the additional first
year depreciation for all classes of property placed in service by Taxpayer during that
taxable year.

   Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the

federal income tax consequences of the facts described above under any other
provisions of the Code (including other subsections of §168). Specifically, no opinion is
expressed or implied on whether any item of depreciable property placed in service by

PLR-113019-14 5

Taxpayer during the A taxable year is eligible for the additional first year depreciation
deduction.

  In accordance with the power of attorney, we are sending a copy of this letter to

Taxpayer’s authorized representatives. We are also sending a copy of this letter to the
appropriate operating division director.

  This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

                                              Sincerely yours,

                                              Karla M. Meola

                                              Karla M. Meola
                                              Assistant to the Branch Chief, Branch 7
                                              Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                              (Income Tax & Accounting)

Enclosures (2):
copy of this letter
copy for section 6110 purposes