Chief Counsel Advice 201502012 Released January 9, 2015 Advice

Partnership notices may go to disregarded entity's owner

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel explained which name and address the IRS should use for partnership notices under IRC § 6223(c). The IRS generally uses the information shown on the partnership return, including the Schedule K-1, unless it receives updated information under the regulations. If a disregarded entity is listed on the K-1, the IRS may instead send notices to that entity's owner. That alternative requires the information to have been updated by either the partners or the IRS under the applicable rules.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the IRS send partnership notices to the owner of a disregarded entity listed on a Schedule K-1?
  • Outcome: Advice given that it may do so when the information is properly updated
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6223(c), including § 6223(c)(3)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2014121512083601 [Third Party Communication:

UILC: 6223.02-00 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]

Number: 201502012
Release Date: 1/9/2015
From:
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 12:08:36 PM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: IRM 4.31.3.3.2.3

Generally correct. Section 6223(c) provides that we are to use the name and address
on the partnership return (i.e., the K-1) unless updated information is provided in
accordance with the regulations. Even if the DE is listed on a k-1 section 6223(c)(3)
allows us to issue the notices to the owner of the DE instead (“in lieu of”) if the
information is updated under the regs by either the partners or the Service.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.