Private Letter Ruling 201501025 Released January 2, 2015 Approved Transcribed from scan

Employer may freeze floor-offset plan accruals

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An employer maintained a floor-offset retirement arrangement combining a defined benefit pension plan with a profit-sharing plan. It proposed freezing pension accruals and ending most future profit-sharing contributions for affected employees while continuing to calculate the final benefit under the same offset formula at termination. The IRS found that the plans' offset calculation remained nondiscretionary and that the pension benefit satisfied the accrual rules without regard to the offset. It ruled that the freeze did not violate the anti-cutback rule because it did not reduce benefits already accrued, an early-retirement benefit, a retirement-type subsidy, or an optional benefit form. The conclusion depended on the representation that both plans remained qualified and their trusts remained tax-exempt.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the employer freeze accruals and contributions under its floor-offset arrangement?
  • Outcome: Approved, the proposed freeze did not conflict with the cited qualification or anti-cutback rules
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a), 411(b)(1), and 411(d)(6); Rev. Rul. 76-259

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES

DIVISION OCT 08 2014
U.I.L. 401.01-03 .

T:EP:RA:A2

Company =
Pension Plan =

Profit Sharing Plan =

Dear

This is in response to a request for a private letter ruling dated January 22, 2014, as
supplemented by correspondence dated March 24, 2014. You request a ruling that the
Company's ability to implement a transaction freezing accruals and contributions under
a floor-offset arrangement for certain participants would not be affected by Revenue
Ruling 76-259 or section 411(d)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the ruling request.

The Company currently provides retirement benefits to certain employees under a floor-
offset arrangement under which the Pension Plan provides the "floor benefit" and the
Profit Sharing Plan provides the "offset benefit." The Company has maintained the
floor-offset arrangement for many years and has consistently received favorable

201501025

determination letters from the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the plans linked
under that arrangement.

Under the arrangement, participants may receive a normal retirement benefit equal to (i)
the participant's "gross" benefit under the Pension Plan payable at normal retirement
age (the "floor benefit"), less (ii) the annuity value of the participant's vested Profit
Sharing Plan balance, determined as of the participant's termination of employment
converted to an actuarially equivalent annual annuity payable for the life of the
participant commencing at the participant's normal retirement date.

The Company intends to freeze benefit accruals for certain participants under the
Pension Plan (the "Affected Participants") and cease discretionary contributions for
those participants under the Profit Sharing Plan. When implemented, this transaction
will limit the aggregate Pension Plan obligations for the Affected Participants to the
amount of such obligations as of the freeze date. The impact of the transaction on an
Affected Participant will be that, upon termination of employment, a participant's
Pension Plan benefit will be his or her accrued benefit as of the freeze date offset by the
annuity value of his or her vested Profit Sharing Plan account as of his or her
termination of employment, the offset benefit. This offset benefit is calculated as the
participant’s vested Profit Sharing Plan balance determined as of the participant’s
termination of employment converted to an actuarially equivalent annual annuity
payable for the life of the participant commencing at the participant's normal retirement
date.

The Company intends to freeze the accrued Pension Plan benefits of the Affected
Participants. Following the freeze date, all discretionary contributions under the Profit
Sharing Plan will cease with respect to the Affected Participants, except for certain final
contributions with respect to compensation earned between the beginning of the year
and the freeze date.

As a result of the freeze transaction, an Affected Participant will be entitled to receive, at
termination of employment, his or her gross benefit under the Pension Plan, calculated
at the freeze date, offset by the annuity value of his or her vested Profit Sharing Plan
account, determined as of the participant's termination of employment. This means that
the gross benefit of an Affected Participant under the Pension Plan will remain fixed, as
of the freeze date, and that the offset portion, valued and applied as of his or her
termination of employment, will reflect any final Profit Sharing Plan contribution
described in the above paragraph, plus investment gains and losses until such
termination.

The freeze transaction will not change the manner in which an Affected Participant's
retirement benefit will be calculated, nor will it alter the timing of the calculation. After
the freeze is implemented, an Affected Participant's Pension Plan benefit, payable at
normal retirement age, will still be calculated at his or her termination of employment
and this benefit will still equal his or her floor Pension Plan amount minus his or her
offset Profit Sharing Plan amount. The freeze transaction will affect only the amounts of

201501025

the floor and offset benefits. More specifically, beyond the freeze date, an Affected
Participant's Pension Plan floor benefit will not reflect any additional accruals nor will his
or her offset benefit reflect additional Profit Sharing Plan contributions (or earnings
attributable to such contributions) that might have been made on account of
compensation earned by the participant after the freeze date, other than the final
contribution previously described.

Requested Ruling

Based on the foregoing facts and representations, you request a ruling that neither
Revenue Ruling 76-259 nor section 411(d)(6) of the Code affects the Company’s ability
to freeze accruals under the Pension Plan with respect to Affected Participants and to
thereafter provide benefits to such participants in the same manner as before the
freeze.

Analysis

Revenue Ruling 76-259 provides certain requirements that a floor-offset arrangement
must satisfy in order to be qualified under section 401(a) of the Code. Under the
Revenue Ruling, benefits will not be considered definitely determinable unless the
benefit offset by the profit sharing plan is determined in a manner that precludes
discretion on the part of the employer with respect to the calculation and the timing of
the offset. In addition, the accrued benefit under the defined benefit plan determined
without regard to the offset derived from the profit sharing plan must satisfy the
requirements of section 411(b)(1) of the Code, and the benefit offset must be equal to
the amount deemed provided on the determination date by the vested portion of the
account balance in the profit sharing plan (plus amounts that would have been provided
by any prior distribution from the account balance).

Section 411(d)(6) of the Code provides that benefits that have been accrued or earned
may not be retroactively reduced through a plan amendment. Section 411(d)(6)(A)
states:

(A) In general.--A plan shall be treated as not satisfying the requirements of this
section if the accrued benefit of a participant is decreased by an amendment of
the plan, other than an amendment described in section 412(d)(2), or section
4281 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

In this case, the criteria in Rev. Rul. 76-259 are satisfied. Each plan has consistently
received favorable determination letters. There is no employer discretion with respect
to the offset calculation or the timing with which it is applied; the Pension Plan benefit
accruals satisfy the requirements of section 411(b)(1) of the Code without regard to the
profit sharing plan offset; and the amount of the benefit offset is the amount deemed
provided by the vested portion of the profit sharing account balance (plus amounts
attributable to prior distributions).

201501025

The proposed freeze amendment does not violate the provisions of section 411(d)(6) of
the Code because it does not retroactively reduce benefits that have been accrued as of
the date of the plan amendment. This amendment also does not eliminate or reduce an
early retirement benefit or a retirement-type subsidy and it does not eliminate an
optional form of benefit.

Accordingly, we conclude that neither Revenue Ruling 76-259 nor section 411(d)(6) of
the Code adversely affect the Company’s ability to freeze accruals under the Pension
Plan with respect to Affected Participants and to thereafter provide benefits to such
participants in the same manner as before the freeze.

This ruling is based on the representation that the Pension Plan and Profit Sharing Plan
are qualified under section 401(a) of the Code, and their related trusts are exempt from
taxation under section 501(a) of the Code, at all times relevant to this transaction.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section or either the Code or regulations which may
be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter ruling is being
sent to your authorized representative.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact
Sincerely yours,

William B. Hulteng
Manager, Employee Plans Technical

Enclosures:
Deleted Copy of letter ruling
Notice 437

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.