Private Letter Ruling 201452027 Released December 26, 2014 Approved Transcribed from scan

Mistitled IRA receives rollover deadline waiver

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A retirement plan participant intended to move his plan balance into an IRA in his own name. His spouse, acting as the plan trustee, followed the financial institution's online instructions, but the institution opened the receiving IRA in her name and did not alert them to the mistake. The error was discovered after the institution used the spouse's age to calculate a required minimum distribution. The IRS waived the 60-day rollover deadline under IRC § 402(c)(3)(B) and gave the participant 60 days to contribute no more than the distributed amount to a correctly titled IRA. The ruling did not permit the rollover of any amount required to be distributed under IRC § 408(a)(6).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the participant receive a rollover waiver after financial institution instructions resulted in an IRA being opened in his spouse's name?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 60 days from the ruling date to complete the rollover
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a)(31), 402(c)(3), and 408(a)(6); Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

SEP 30 2014

Uniform Issue List: 402.03-00

Legend:

Taxpayer A =
Individual B =
Financial Institution C =

Plan D =
IRAE =
IRA F =

Amount 1 =
Amount 2 =
Amount 3 =

Amount 4 =

Dear:

This letter is in response to your request dated May 9, 2014, and supplemented by
correspondence dated August 5, August 6, 2014 and September 2, 2014, from your
authorized representative, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover
requirement under section 402(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the ruling requested:

Taxpayer A represents that a distribution equal to Amount 1 was made from Plan D in
2012. Taxpayer A further represents that he intended that Amount 1 be transferred to
an individual retirement arrangement (“IRA”) in his name. Taxpayer A asserts that his
failure to accomplish a rollover to an IRA described under section 408(a) of the Code,
within the 60-day period prescribed by section 402(c)(3), was due to improper
instruction given by Financial Institution C in opening an IRA online at Financial
Institution C and the failure of Financial Institution C to alert Taxpayer A to the fact that
Amount 1 was transferred to an IRA that was not titled in the name of Taxpayer A.

Taxpayer A was the owner of a company that sponsored Plan D. He participated in Plan
D until his company was dissolved in 2012. Taxpayer A intended to roll over his
account in Plan D, which was held by Financial Institution C, to an IRA with Financial
Institution C.

Individual B, Taxpayer A’s spouse, was the Trustee of Plan D and handled matters
related to Plan D. Individual B’s name, as Trustee, was on the account of Plan D held
by Financial Institution C. On July 8, 2012, Individual B logged into the Financial
Institution C website to facilitate transferring Taxpayer A’s account in Plan D to an IRA
in his name. Individual B had a “live chat” with a representative of Financial Institution C
on how to open an IRA in Taxpayer A’s name. Individual B completed the online
application and sent a follow up letter to Financial Institution C requesting the transfer
based on the “live chat” with the representative of Financial Institution C. The letter was
signed by Taxpayer A and Individual B.

In her capacity as Trustee of Plan D, Individual B intended to open an IRA in Taxpayer
A’s name but instead IRA E was opened in her name by mistake. After receiving the
account statements, Individual B reasoned that her name was listed on IRA E because
she had been listed on the Plan D account for many years as Trustee. Individual B also
thought that the fact that her name was on IRA E meant she had the same trading
authority as she had as Trustee over Plan D.

During July, August and September of 2012, Amounts 2, 3 and 4 (totaling Amount 1)
were transferred from Plan D, via trustee-to-trustee transfer, to IRA E.

Individual B first discovered the mistake in 2014 when she received a letter from
Financial Institution C regarding taking the required minimum distribution from IRA E.
The letter listed Individual B’s age rather than Taxpayer A’s age. Individual B checked
with Financial Institution C and the date of birth used to calculate the 2013 required
minimum distribution from IRA E was her date of birth and not Taxpayer A’s. No
monies have been withdrawn from IRA E except the required minimum distributions
based on Individual B’s date of birth. Financial Institution C has indicated they will
recalculate the required minimum distribution amount using Taxpayer A’s date of birth.

Following the discovery of the mistake and after speaking with Financial Institution C,
Individual B opened IRA F with Financial Institution C in Taxpayer A’s name.

Individual B had taken all the appropriate steps, including seeking advice from Financial
Institution C which had held the Plan D account for years, to ensure she was
transferring Taxpayer A’s Plan D account to an IRA in Taxpayer A’s name. The failure
to transfer the Plan D account into a correctly titled IRA was due to improper instruction
given to Individual B during the “live chat” with a representative of Financial Institution C
on how to open an IRA in Taxpayer A’s name.

Based on the facts and representations you request a ruling that the Internal
Revenue Service (the “Service”) waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in
section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code with respect to the distribution of Amount 1 from Plan
D.

Section 402(c) of the Code provides rules governing rollovers of amounts from
exempt trusts to eligible retirement plans, including IRAs.

Section 402(c)(1) of the Code provides that if any portion of the balance to the
credit of an employee in a qualified trust is paid to the employee in an eligible rollover
distribution, and the distributee transfers any portion of the property received in such
distribution to an eligible retirement plan, and in the case of a distribution of property
other than money, the amount so transferred consists of the property distributed, then
such distribution (to the extent transferred) shall not be includible in gross income for
the taxable year in which paid.

Section 402(c)(3)(A) of the Code states that such rollover must be accomplished
within 60 days following the day on which the distributee received the property. An
individual retirement account (IRA) constitutes one form of eligible retirement plan.

Section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code provides, in relevant part, that the Secretary
may waive the 60-day requirement under section 402(c) of the Code where the failure to
waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty,
disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such
requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for
the waiver under section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code.

Section 401(a)(31) of the Code provides the rules for governing “direct transfers
of eligible rollover distributions”.

Section 1.401(a)(31) of the Income Tax Regulations, Question and Answer-15,
provides, in relevant part, that an eligible rollover distribution that is paid to an eligible
retirement plan in a direct rollover is a distribution and rollover, and not a transfer of
assets and liabilities.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in
determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to
sections 408(d)(3)(I) and 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant
facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2)
inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration,
restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error; (3) the use of the amount

distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was
cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution occurred.

The information presented and the documentation submitted by Taxpayer A are
consistent with his assertion that the failure to accomplish a timely rollover was due to
improper instruction given by Financial Institution C and the failure of Financial
Institution C to alert Taxpayer A to the fact that Amount 1 was transferred to an IRA that
was not titled in the name of Taxpayer A.

Therefore, pursuant to section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code, the Service hereby
waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount 1 from
Plan D. Taxpayer A is granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of this ruling letter
to contribute an amount not more than Amount 1 into IRA F. Provided all other
requirements of section 402(c)(3) of the Code, except the 60-day requirement, are met
with respect to such contribution, the contribution will be considered a rollover
contribution within the meaning of section 402(c)(3) of the Code.

This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be
distributed by section 408(a)(6) of the Code.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described
herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which
may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter ruling has been sent to your authorized representatives
pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office. If you wish to inquire about this
ruling, please contact (ID ) at ( ) . Please address all
correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T1.

Sincerely,

Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1
Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

CC:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.