Corporation receives relief for invalid S election caused by trusts
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Two trusts owned shares when a corporation's S election took effect. Their beneficiaries elected qualified subchapter S trust treatment, but the trusts did not meet the QSST requirements. The trusts were eligible to be electing small business trusts, but their trustees mistakenly failed to make ESBT elections, leaving the corporation with ineligible shareholders and an ineffective S election. The IRS found the invalid election inadvertent and allowed the corporation to be treated as an S corporation from the intended effective date. Within 120 days, the trustees must file retroactive ESBT elections and the corporation, trusts, and other shareholders must file any required amended returns and adjustments, or the ruling becomes void.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the corporation obtain relief when two shareholder trusts made ineffective QSST elections and failed to elect ESBT treatment?
- Outcome: Approved, conditioned on retroactive ESBT elections and corrective filings within 120 days
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(d), 1361(e), and 1362(f); Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-1(m)(2)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201451017 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/19/2014 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------------- -----------------------------, ID No. -------------
-------------------------------- -----------------
-------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------- ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:01
PLR-116428-14
Date:
September 09, 2014
Legend
X = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
State = --------------
Date 1 = ----------------------------
Date 2 = ----------------------
Trust 1 = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Trust 2 = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
Dear --------------:
This responds to a letter dated April 10, 2014, and subsequent correspondence
submitted on behalf of X by X’s authorized representative, requesting inadvertent invalid
election relief under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.
The information submitted states that X was incorporated under the laws of State
on Date 1. X filed a timely election under § 1362(a) to be treated as an S corporation
effective Date 2. On Date 2, Trust 1 and Trust 2 each owned shares of X stock. The
sole income beneficiaries of Trust 1 and Trust 2 filed elections under § 1361(d)(2) to be
treat Trust 1 and Trust 2 as qualified subchapter S trusts (QSSTs) effective Date 2;
however, Trust 1 and Trust 2 did not meet the requirements of a QSST within the
meaning of § 1361(d)(3). X represents that Trust 1 and Trust 2 were eligible to be
electing small business trusts (ESBTs) within the meaning of § 1361(e) effective Date 2,
but the trustees of Trust 1 and Trust 2 mistakenly failed to file an election to treat Trust 1
and Trust 2 as ESBTs. Therefore, Trust 1 and Trust 2 were not eligible shareholders
and, as a result, X’s S corporation election was ineffective.
PLR-116428-14 2
X represents that the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness of X’s S
corporation election were inadvertent and not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive
tax planning. Additionally, X represents that X and its shareholders have filed their
federal income tax returns consistent with having a valid S corporation election in effect
for X as of Date 2. X and its shareholders agree to make such adjustments (consistent
with the treatment of X as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary.
Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to
any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is
in effect for such year.
Section 1361(b)(1)(B) provides that, for purposes of subchapter S, the term
“small business corporation” means a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible
corporation and which does not have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a
trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not
an individual.
Section 1361(d)(1)(A) provides that a QSST, within the meaning of § 1361(d)(3),
may be a shareholder for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B). The beneficiary of the trust
makes the QSST election pursuant to § 1361(d)(2).
Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(v) provides that an ESBT, within the meaning of
§ 1361(e)(1), may be a shareholder for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B). The trustee of the
trust makes the ESBT election pursuant to § 1361(e)(3). Section 1.1361-1(m)(2)(i)
provides that the trustee of an ESBT must make the ESBT election by signing and filing,
with the service center where the S corporation files its income tax return, a statement
that meets the requirements of § 1361-1(m)(2)(ii).
Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any
corporation was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that
the circumstances resulting in such termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a
reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in such
termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for which the termination occurred
is a small business corporation, and (4) the corporation for which the termination
occurred, and each person who was a shareholder in such corporation at any time
during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments
(consistent with the treatment of such corporation as an S corporation) as may be
required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the
circumstances resulting in such termination, such corporation shall be treated as an S
corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.
Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we
conclude that X's S corporation election was inadvertently invalid on Date 2 because X
had ineligible shareholders. We further conclude that, pursuant to the provisions of
PLR-116428-14 3
§ 1362(f), X will be treated as an S corporation from Date 2 and thereafter, provided that
X’s election to be an S corporation was not otherwise ineffective and was not terminated
under § 1362(d).
This ruling is conditioned on (1) the trustees of Trust 1 and Trust 2 file ESBT
elections effective Date 2 with the appropriate service center; and (2) X and each of its
shareholders filing any amended returns and making such adjustments necessary to
properly reflect the reporting of X’s items of S corporation income, including the filing
amended returns by Trust 1 and Trust 2 consistent with the treatment of the trusts as
ESBTs. The ESBT election and the amended returns must be filed within 120 days
following the date of this letter and a copy of this letter should be attached to any such
elections or returns. If X or its shareholders fail to treat themselves as described above,
this ruling is null and void.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other
provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied regarding X’s
eligibility to be an S corporation or Trust 1 or Trust 2’s eligibility to be an ESBT.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of
the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Pursuant to a power
of attorney on file, a copy of this letter is being sent to X’s authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Bradford R. Poston
Senior Counsel, Branch 3
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this Letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.