Private Letter Ruling 201451012 Released December 19, 2014 Approved

Foreign insurer receives extra time for domestic and small-company elections

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A foreign property and casualty insurance company relied on its law firm and accountant to handle its initial U.S. tax filings. Both the § 953(d) election to be treated as a domestic corporation and the § 831(b) small-insurance-company election were attached to its timely return, but the accountant did not send the § 953(d) election to the separate IRS address required by Rev. Proc. 2003-47. The law firm discovered the error later, and the company promptly requested relief. The IRS found reasonable, good-faith reliance on tax professionals and no prejudice to the government. It granted 60 days to make both elections for the company's first tax year. The ruling does not determine whether the company otherwise qualifies, and any otherwise applicable penalties and interest remain in effect.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the foreign insurer make late § 953(d) and § 831(b) elections after its accountant failed to follow the separate filing procedure?
  • Outcome: Approved, with a 60-day extension for both elections
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 831(b) and 953(d); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-3 and 301.9100-8; Notice 89-79; Rev. Proc. 2003-47

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201451012 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/19/2014 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number:9100.22-00, 953.06-00,
831.00-00 Person To Contact:
----------------------, ID No. ------------------
------------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------- ----------------------
-------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
----------------------- CC:FIP:B04
------------------------------- PLR-111980-14
Date:
August 27, 2014

Legend

Company = --------------------------------------------

County X = --------------------------

Individual = -----------------------------

Law Firm = -------------------------------

CPA = -----------------------

Manager = ----------------------------------

Year 1 = -------

Year 2 = --------

Year 3 = -------

Year 4 = -------

Date A = -------------------

Date B = -------------------

Date C = -------------------
PLR-111980-14 2

Date D = --------------

Date E = --------------------

Dear ----------------------:

This is in response to a letter received by our office submitted on behalf of Company by
its authorized representative, requesting an extension of time under section 301.9100-3
of the Procedure and Administration Regulations (1) to make the election under section
953(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) to be treated as a domestic corporation for
federal income tax purposes commencing on the first day of Company’s taxable year for
Year 1; and (2) to make the election provided by section 831(b) of the Code for the
alternative tax for certain small insurance companies for Year 1.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by Company and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by
an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.

FACTS

Company was formed under the laws of Country X on Date A of Year 1 and was issued
its insurance license on Date B of Year 1. On Date C of Year 1 Company first issued
directly written insurance policies. Company represents that it qualifies as a property
and casualty insurance company under Part II of subchapter L for federal income tax
purposes if it is treated as a domestic company. All of the stock of Company is owned
by Individual who is Company’s treasurer.

In the course of forming and initiating the operations of Company, it retained the
services of Manager. The primary services provided by Manager included monitoring
Company compliance with the Country X regulations, maintaining statutory insurance
records for inspection by the Country X insurance regulators, ensuring due diligence
records are accurate and up to date, and executing insurance contracts issued by
Company. Manager’s responsibilities did not include monitoring Company’s compliance
with federal income tax laws. That responsibility was borne by Company’s law firm,
Law Firm, and accountant, CPA.

Legal counsel for Company since inception has been Law Firm. CPA was Company’s
accountant from inception through the end of Year 3. Company engaged CPA to
prepare Company’s Form 1120-PC, U.S. Property and Casualty Company Income Tax
Return, for Year 1. All other matters connected with Company’s compliance with
federal income tax laws, including the preparation of the section 953(d) election were
the responsibility of Law Firm. Initially, it was anticipated that Company’s section 953(d)
PLR-111980-14 3

election would be prepared by Law Firm. However, in connection with the preparation
of the initial Form 1120-PC for Year 1, CPA offered to prepare the section 953(d)
election statement and the Law Firm agreed to let CPA do so.

The Year 1 Form 1120-PC was timely filed on Date D of Year 2. (Company represents
that no income taxes are due for Year 1.) The elections under both section 953(d) and
the section 831(b) were attached to Company’s Form 1120-PC. However, the CPA did
not mail the section 953(d) election to the specific Internal Revenue Service (Service)
address required by Rev. Proc. 2003-47, 2003-2 C.B. 55. The error was discovered by
Law Firm on or about Date E of Year 4 and within a reasonable time thereafter
Company filed this request for relief.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

The substantive and procedural rules for making a section 953(d) election are contained
in Notice 89-79, 1989-2 C.B. 392, and Rev. Proc. 2003-47, 2003 C.B. 55, respectively.
These rules provide that the election must be filed by the due date prescribed in section
6072(b) (including extensions) for an income tax return that is due if the election
becomes effective. Section 4.04(2), Rev. Proc. 2003-47. In addition, an electing
corporation must use the calendar year as its annual accounting period for federal
income tax purposes, unless it joins in the filing of a consolidated return and adopts the
parent corporation’s tax years. Section 1, Notice 89-79.

Insurance companies other than life insurance companies are taxable under section

  1. However, certain insurance companies can elect to pay an alternative tax
    provided in section 831(b) on only their investment income. Section 831(b)(2)(A)(ii)
    requires that a company elect the application of the alternative tax imposed by section
    831(b). Pursuant to section 301.9100-8(a)(1), this election must be made by the due
    date (taking into account any extension of time to file obtained by the taxpayer) for the
    first taxable year for which the election is effective.

Under section 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of
time pursuant to sections 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election (but
no more than 6 months except in the case when the taxpayer is abroad), under all
subtitles of the Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 831(b) is part of subtitle A.

Section 301.9100-3 provides that requests or extensions of time for regulatory elections
that do not meet the requirements of section 301.9100-2 (automatic extension) must be
made pursuant to section 301.9100-3. Under section 301.9100-3(a), relief will be
granted only when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of
the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
PLR-111980-14 4

Under section 301.9100-3(b)(1), a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in
good faith if the taxpayer (i) requests relief under this section before the failure is
discovered by the Service; (ii) failed to make the election because of intervening events
beyond the taxpayer’s control; (iii) failed to make the election because after exercising
reasonable diligence (taking into account the taxpayer’s experience and the complexity
of the return or issue), the taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the election; (iv)
reasonably relied on the written advice of the Service; or (v) reasonably relied on a
qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer and the
tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make the election.

Under section 301.9100-3(b)(2), a taxpayer will not be considered to have reasonably
relied on a qualified tax professional if the taxpayer knew or should have known that the
professional was not competent to render advice on a regulatory election or was not
aware of all relevant facts.

Under section 301.9100-3(c)(1),the Commissioner will grant a reasonable extension of
time to make a regulatory election only when the interests of the Government will not be
prejudiced by the granting of relief. The interests of the Government are prejudiced if
granting relief would result in a taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for
all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would have had if the
election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money).

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that
the requirements of section 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Company’s section 953(d)
election was not filed at the address specified in Rev. Proc. 2003-47 and accordingly is
not considered timely. Company, through Individual, is deemed to have acted
reasonably in good faith under section 301.9100-3(b) and the interests of the
Government are not prejudiced under section 301.9100-3(c).

RULINGS

Company is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to
make the election provided by section 953(d) in accordance with the rules set forth in
Notice 89-79 and Rev. Proc. 2003-47, to be treated as a domestic corporation for
federal income tax purposes effective for the tax year ending on Date C, Year 1.
Further, Company is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this ruling
letter to make the election provided by section 831(b) for the tax year ended on Date C.
Year 1.

The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Company is otherwise
eligible to make the election under section 953(d) or section 831(b) (e.g., no opinion is
express or implied as to whether Company is an insurance company for federal income
tax purposes).
PLR-111980-14 5

Notwithstanding that an extension of time is granted under section 301.9100-3 to make
the elections under sections 953(d) and 831(b), penalties and interest that would
otherwise be applicable, if any, continue to apply with respect to the income for the tax
year ended on Date C, Year 1.

A copy of this letter should be associated with Company’s sections 953(d) and 831(b)
elections.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

No opinion has been requested and no opinion is expressed, as to the application of
any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling is being
furnished to your authorized representative.

                                          Sincerely,

                                           John E. Glover
                                          JOHN E. GLOVER
                                          Senior Counsel, Branch 4
                                          Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                          (Financial Institutions & Products)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.