Determination Letter 201450029 Released December 12, 2014 Approved Transcribed from scan

Asset transfer between VEBAs preserves exempt status

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Two voluntary employees' beneficiary associations had been funded entirely by employers to provide welfare benefits for different categories of employees. One VEBA transferred its obligations for inactive and retired employees in one category to the other VEBA, leaving the first trust with excess assets and the receiving trust underfunded by the same redacted amount. The trusts proposed transferring those excess assets, and represented that no beneficiary would receive fewer or lower-quality benefits. The IRS found that both organizations would continue using substantially all operations to provide permissible life, health, accident, and related benefits. Because the transfer did not violate the VEBA requirements or create prohibited private inurement, it would not adversely affect the recipient's § 501(c)(9) status.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would transferring excess assets from one VEBA to another after a related transfer of benefit obligations harm the recipient's exempt status?
  • Outcome: Approved, exempt status preserved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(a) and 501(c)(9); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.501(c)(9)-1 and 1.501(c)(9)-4(a)

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Contact Person:
Number: 201450029
Release Date: 12/12/2014 Identification Number:

Telephone Number:

Date: September 16, 2014
Taxpayer Identification Number:

U.I.L.: 501.09-00

Legend:

Trust =

Category P Employees =
Category C Employees =
x =

Dear

We have considered your ruling request dated October 3, 2013, concerning the tax
consequences under § 501(c)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code of the proposed transfer of $x
from Trust to you.

Facts:

You were established to provide benefits to active and recently retired Category P Employees.
Trust was established to provide benefits to inactive vested Category P Employees, retired
Category P Employees, and active and inactive vested Category C Employees. Both you and
Trust were recognized by the Internal Revenue Service as organizations described as voluntary
employees’ beneficiary associations (“VEBAs”) under § 501(c)(9).

You have represented that all of your assets and the assets in Trust were contributed by the
employers of Category P and C Employees, and no contributions were made by a beneficiary of
either you or Trust. Trust ceased to have an obligation to provide benefits for inactive vested
Category P Employees or retired Category P Employees, and this obligation was placed on you.
As a consequence, the only benefit provided through Trust is life insurance for active and
inactive vested Category C Employees. Before this change, your obligation was limited to
providing medical, dental, prescription drug, life insurance and accidental death and
dismemberment insurance benefits for active and recently retired Category P Employees. The
purpose of the transfer of obligations was to consolidate the obligation to provide welfare
benefits to active and retired Category P Employees, and only Category P Employees, under a
single trust — you. Certain of the benefit programs provided through you are administered
pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement.

You have represented that as a result of the transfer of the obligation to provide welfare benefits
for retired Category P Employees from Trust to you, Trust has assets in excess of its needs for
the foreseeable future. Trust proposes to transfer $x of these excess assets to you. You have
also represented that if this proposed transfer of assets is approved and implemented, no
beneficiary will suffer a decrease in the quality or quantity of benefits as a result.

Ruling Requested:

The proposed transfer of assets will not adversely affect your tax-exempt status under
§ 501(c)(9).

Law:

Section 501(a) of the Code exempts from federal income tax those organizations described in
§ 501(c).

Section 501(c)(9) describes VEBAs as providing for the payment of life, sick, accident, or other
benefits to the members of such associations or their dependents or designated beneficiaries, if
no part of the net earnings of such association inures (other than through such payments) to the
benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(9)-1 summarizes the requirements to be met in order to qualify as a tax
exempt organization described in § 501(c)(9) as follows:

(a) The organization is an employees’ organization;

(b) Membership in the organization is voluntary;

(c) The organization provides for the payment of life, sick, accident, or other benefits to
its members or their dependents or designated beneficiaries and substantially all of
its operations are in furtherance of providing such benefits; and,

(d) No part of the net earnings of the organization inures, other than by payment of the
benefits referred to in in paragraph (c) of this section, to the benefit of any private
shareholder or individual.

Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(9)-4(a) restates the prohibited inurement rule contained in § 501(c)(9)
and provides that no part of the net earnings of a VEBA may inure to the benefit of any private
shareholder or individual other than through the payment of permissible benefits (benefits
described in Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(9)-3). Whether prohibited inurement has occurred is a
question to be determined with regard to all the facts and circumstances.

Analysis:

Section 1.501(c)(9)-1 of the Treasury Regulations summarizes the four requirements for an
organization to meet in order to qualify as a tax-exempt organization under § 501(a) and to be
described as a VEBA under § 501(c)(9). These four requirements are as follows: (a) The
organization is an employees’ organization; (b) Membership in the organization is voluntary; (c)
The organization provides for the payment of life, sick, accident, or other benefits to its
members or their dependents or designated beneficiaries and substantially all of its operations

are in furtherance of providing such benefits; and, (d) No part of the net earnings of the
organization inures, other than by payment of the benefits referred to in in paragraph (c) of this
section, to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. The proposed transfer described
above does not violate any of these four requirements.

Both you and Trust have been recognized as exempt under § 501(a) because you both meet
the requirements of VEBAs as described under § 501(c)(9). The obligation to provide life
insurance benefits for inactive vested Category P Employees or medical benefits for retired
Category P Employees was transferred from Trust to you. Also as a result of this transfer of
obligations, Trust is “over funded” by $x and you are “under funded” by $x. The proposed
transaction is to transfer $x from Trust to you to be used to provide welfare benefits to active
and retired Category P Employees. Although Trust will now only provide benefits to Category C

Employees and you will now only provide benefits to Category P Employees, it has been

represented that no beneficiary of either you or Trust will suffer a decrease in the quality or

quantity of benefits as a result of this transaction. As such, both you and Trust will continue to

provide for the payment of life, sick, accident, or other benefits to members or their dependents

or designated beneficiaries and substantially all of both your operations are in furtherance of

providing such benefits.

Conclusion:

Based on the foregoing and the representations provided, the proposed transfer of assets will
not adversely affect your tax-exempt status under § 501(c)(9).

This ruling will be made available for public inspection under § 6110 after certain deletions of
identifying information are made. For details, see enclosed Notice 437, Notice of intention to
Disclose. A copy of this ruling with deletions that we intend to make available for public
inspection is attached to Notice 437. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, you should
follow the instructions in Notice 437.

This ruling is directed only to the organization that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

This ruling is based on the facts as they were presented and on the understanding that there will
be no material changes in these facts. This ruling does not address the applicability of any
section of the Code or regulations to the facts submitted other than with respect to the sections
described. Because it could help resolve questions concerning your federal income tax status,
this ruling should be kept in your permanent records.

If you have any questions about this ruling, please contact the person whose name and
telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney currently on file with the Internal Revenue Service, we
are sending a copy of this letter to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Michael Seto
Manager, EO Technical

Enclosure
Notice 437

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.