Cellular system cables and site rights qualify as REIT real property
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A publicly traded company planning to elect REIT status owned or leased indoor and outdoor systems that improved cellular service in high-density locations. The IRS ruled that permanently installed fiber-optic cable, indoor coaxial cable, and related conduit were real property under § 856. Easements, licenses, rights of way, attachment rights, cable-use rights, and similar site interests also qualified as interests in real property. Payments for tenants' dedicated cable strands and related property interests qualified as rents from real property, subject to the limit for personal-property rent. Customary design, construction oversight, power, monitoring, inspection, and minor-repair services did not create impermissible tenant service income.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did the cellular infrastructure, related site rights, and tenant payments qualify under the REIT real-property and rent rules?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 856(c)(4), 856(c)(5), and 856(d); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.856-3 and 1.856-4
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201450017 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/12/2014 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 856.00-00, 856.02-00,
856.04-00 Person To Contact:
------------------
---------------------- ID No. ----------------
------------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------- --------------------
---------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
-------------------------- CC:FIP:B03
PLR-148908-13
Date:
August 29, 2014
LEGEND:
Taxpayer = ------------------------------------------------------------------------
State X = ------------
a = --
b = ---
c = ---
d = ---
e = -----
f = ---------
Date 1 = --------------------------
Dear ------------:
This ruling responds to a letter dated November 26, 2013, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted on behalf of Taxpayer. Taxpayer owns or leases indoor and
outdoor small cellular telephone systems (“Systems”). Taxpayer has requested the
PLR-148908-13 2
following rulings in connection with Taxpayer's intent to elect to be taxed as a real
estate investment trust (“REIT”) under § 856 through § 860 of the Internal Revenue
Code:
(1) The fiber optic cable used in indoor and outdoor Systems, coaxial cable used
in indoor Systems, and related conduit piping (collectively, the “System Components”),
qualify as “real property” for purposes of § 856 of the Code;
(2) Taxpayer’s rights to use real property owned by others for the System
Components and other items in its Systems (collectively and as more fully defined
below, the “Property Interests”) qualify as “interests in real property” under
§ 856(c)(5)(C); and
(3) Subject to § 856(d)(1)(C), amounts received by Taxpayer for the use of the
System Components and the related Property Interests qualify as “rents from real
property” under § 856(d)(1). The provision by Taxpayer of the Tenant Services does
not give rise to impermissible tenant service income, and will not cause any portion of
the rents received by Taxpayer from Tenants for use of the System Components and
the related Property Interests to fail to qualify as “rents from real property” under
§ 856(d).
FACTS
Taxpayer is a publicly traded State X corporation that intends to elect to be
treated as a REIT beginning with its taxable year ending on Date 1.
A segment of Taxpayer’s overall business involves the leasing of Systems to
wireless communications providers (“Tenants”). Each System consists of the System
Components, other items, and the Property Interests. The fiber optic cable and the
Property Interests are the primary components of each System.
The Systems allow wireless carriers to provide enhanced cellphone service to
customers in high-density locations where it is not possible to provide sufficient capacity
or coverage through traditional cell towers and rooftop sites. The Systems are generally
located outdoors; however, some of the Systems are located indoors in a building or
other host venue (e.g., a stadium) (hereinafter referred to collectively as “building”).
Taxpayer enters into agreements with the Tenants pursuant to which Taxpayer
grants a Tenant the right to use a System for the Tenant’s telecommunications signals.
These agreements typically have initial terms ranging from a to b years (in many cases
with one or more Tenant options to extend the term). Tenants pay Taxpayer a fixed,
recurring amount that may escalate periodically.
System Components
PLR-148908-13 3
When a customer of a wireless carrier places a call in an area served by a
System, an antenna within the System receives a radio frequency signal from the
caller’s cellphone. The signal is then transported via coaxial cable to an optical
converter. The optical converter converts the electrical signal into an optical signal,
which then flows through strands of fiber optic cable to a base station. Equipment at the
base station converts the optical signal back into an electrical signal. The electrical
signal passes through coaxial cable to other base station equipment, and through this
other base station equipment to the wireless carrier’s cellular network. When a wireless
carrier’s customer receives a call (or when a customer’s call is answered), the process
is reversed.
Taxpayer owns the antennas in both indoor and outdoor Systems. Optical
converters in outdoor Systems are, with limited exceptions, owned by the Tenants.
Because of the limited space available for indoor Systems it is not practical to have
multiple Tenants each supply their own optical converter, so Taxpayer owns the shared
optical converters for indoor Systems. Taxpayer owns the metal equipment cabinets
that house the optical converters in outdoor Systems. Tenants own the base station
equipment in both indoor and outdoor Systems. Taxpayer owns the coaxial cable in
both indoor and outdoor Systems. Taxpayer generally owns the fiber optic cable in both
indoor and outdoor Systems. In limited circumstances, rather than own a fiber optic
cable outright, Taxpayer holds an exclusive and “indefeasible right to use” (“IRU”)
certain strands of fiber optic cable owned by third parties. An IRU typically lasts for a
fixed period of time (e.g., c years), often with the possibility of renewals, after which the
right to use the relevant strands reverts to the third-party owner of the cable. The
conduit piping through which the fiber optic cable and indoor System coaxial cable is
run may be owned by Taxpayer or may be owned by a third-party that grants Taxpayer
a right to use space in the conduit piping for purposes of installing Taxpayer’s fiber optic
cable.
Taxpayer has requested a ruling with respect to the System Components, that is,
the fiber optic cable used in indoor and outdoor Systems, coaxial cable used in indoor
Systems, and related conduit piping. Taxpayer has not requested a ruling with respect
to the antennas, optical converters, metal equipment cabinets, base station equipment,
and outdoor coaxial cable; Taxpayer has represented that it intends to treat these other
items as personal property for purposes of REIT qualification.
In an outdoor System, the antenna, coaxial cable, optical converter, and
equipment cabinet are each affixed to a structure (typically, a utility or street light pole).
The optical converter is housed in a metal equipment cabinet. The base station
equipment is typically located in a building, shed, or other structure (which may be a
number of miles away). Fiber optic cable, which runs from the optical converter to the
base station, may be either buried in the ground (including in conduit piping that is
buried in the ground) or installed above ground (typically strung between telephone or
PLR-148908-13 4
electric poles). Once installed, the fiber optic cable is intended to remain in place for the
entirety of its useful life (generally, b to d years or longer).
In an indoor System, each antenna is affixed to a wall or ceiling, or mounted
behind the panels of a ceiling. The optical converters and base station equipment are
typically located inside the building in an equipment room or closet; however, if there is
insufficient space within the building, the equipment may be located in a shed or similar
structure adjacent to the building. The coaxial cable and fiber optic cable generally are
embedded within the walls, ceilings, or floors of the building, and may run down elevator
shafts and through crawl spaces. Generally cables are bundled with other wiring in the
building and may be run through conduit piping that is permanently embedded within
the walls, ceiling, or floor of a building. Cables are not tacked to the exterior of walls,
strung along floors or ceilings, or otherwise exposed. To ensure safety of the public and
to protect the integrity of indoor cabling, cables are only exposed if a particular situation
requires it, and then only for as short a distance as possible. Where the cables are
visible, they are integrated with the structural components of the related building. For
example, a cable that runs from one end of a stadium to the other end may run through
conduit piping that is located in the rafters or permanently affixed to a catwalk.
Similarly, if a portion of a cable that is otherwise embedded in walls or ceilings must be
run outside an interior wall of the building, that portion will usually be contained in a
conduit pipe that is bolted to the wall or ceiling, or whose ends are embedded in the wall
or ceiling. Thus, in terms of location and method of affixation, Taxpayer’s coaxial and
fiber optic cables are integrated into the building in the same manner as the other wiring
(e.g., electrical) or cabling in the building. The length of both the coaxial cable and fiber
optic cable generally range from e to f feet.
An indoor System installed at a site with multiple buildings (e.g., a college
campus) is one large System connected by fiber optic cable to a single base station.
The fiber optic cable that connects each building to the base station is typically buried in
the ground in a manner similar to outdoor Systems. Fiber optic cable that runs outdoors
typically enters or exits the building’s floor or basement using the same conduits used
for the other wiring or cabling in the building. If the building’s existing conduits are
unavailable or congested, Taxpayer installs separate conduit for the fiber optic cable.
Taxpayer represents that because of the degree to which the indoor coaxial and
fiber optic cables are integrated with the buildings in which they are housed, it is
extremely difficult, costly, and damaging to the related building to remove these cables.
As a result, the coaxial and fiber optic cables are in fact rarely, if ever, removed. The
conduit piping through which fiber optic cable and indoor coaxial cable is run is also
extremely difficult and expensive to remove, especially in the case of directionally bored
conduit and trenched conduit used in outdoor Systems. Removing fiber optic and
indoor coaxial cables from a conduit without removing the conduit itself is slightly easier,
but even this process is difficult and expensive and is unlikely to ever occur for any
particular fiber optic or indoor coaxial cable. Moreover, when Taxpayer holds an IRU for
PLR-148908-13 5
certain strands of fiber optic cable that are owned by third parties, individual strands of
fiber optic cable cannot be removed from the cable of which they are a part.
Taxpayer represents that, with very rare exceptions, the System Components
have not been moved to a new location and cannot be moved without incurring
prohibitive expense. The System Components are only moved to be replaced at the
end of their useful lives. The System Components are designed to remain in place
indefinitely. At the time of installation, the System Components are not expected to
ever be moved to a different location. Because of the manner in which the System
Components are attached to the ground, building, or other inherently permanent
structure, removal of any such component is likely to cause irreparable damage to the
component rendering that component useless in other locations. Removing the System
Components in an indoor System would be extremely damaging to the building. Fiber
optic cable in outdoor systems is buried deep in the ground or affixed to other inherently
permanent structures. Taxpayer is not required to remove the System Components at
the expiration of the Property Interests in the real property to which the components are
affixed. Removing the System Components would represent a major endeavor and
would be extremely costly.
Property Interests
Taxpayer generally does not own the poles or other structures to which the
System Components are affixed, nor does Taxpayer own the land or the buildings in
which the System Components are located. In addition, in some circumstances
Taxpayer does not own the fiber optic cable that it uses in its Systems or the conduit
piping through which that cable or indoor coaxial cable is run. Instead, Taxpayer holds
interests that generally take the form of easements, licenses, rights of way, “attachment
rights,” and other rights to occupy the land or structures to which the System
Components are affixed, as well as, in limited circumstances, IRUs for specific strands
of fiber optic cable, and the right to use space in conduit piping (collectively, the
“Property Interests”). In exchange for the Property Interests, Taxpayer typically pays
the owner of the applicable property (or holder of a leasehold interest therein) a fixed,
recurring, and periodic payment and, in some cases (generally with respect to indoor
Systems), may make payments to the owner that are based on the Taxpayer’s gross
revenues from leasing the System that uses one or more of the Property Interests in the
owner’s property.
Taxpayer represents that it currently treats and will treat IRUs as either fee
ownership of the underlying strands of fiber optic cable or a leasehold interest in those
strands, depending on the nature of the IRU.
Tenant Services
PLR-148908-13 6
Under its lease agreements with Tenants, Taxpayer may be obligated to furnish
certain services that Taxpayer represents are usually and customarily provided in
connection with leasing telecommunications infrastructure similar to the Systems. The
usual and customary services performed by Taxpayer include certain services provided
in designing Systems (as discussed below), overseeing the construction of Systems by
third party contractors, providing Tenants access to electrical power or submetering
electricity to power the System Components and other items in Systems that require
electricity, providing ongoing monitoring of the functioning of Systems (i.e., ensuring that
Systems are actually working, as opposed to monitoring and adjusting the System
Components or other items in Systems for optimal performance), periodic inspections of
the System Components and other items in Systems and, if needed, minor repair work
on the System Components (all such services, the “Tenant Services”).
Taxpayer represents that any design services are not unique to a particular
Tenant, but rather, are provided to all Tenants to ensure that the Systems provide
sufficient functionality to meet both current and future Tenants’ needs. The design
process is necessary to ensure that a System can serve the basic purpose for which it
is constructed and leased--to allow existing and future Tenants to lease space adequate
to provide the desired level of coverage to their customers.
In addition, Taxpayer represents that the Tenant Services are performed to
prepare a System for lease by a Tenant and to ensure that the System is operational,
and remains safe and secure. Taxpayer represents that because a System may be
leased to several different Tenants, the Tenant Services cannot, as a practical matter,
be performed by the Tenants. Taxpayer represents that the electricity costs are passed
through to its Tenants with only a small mark-up to compensate Taxpayer for invoicing
and other administrative expenses associated with paying the utility. Taxpayer
represents that any services provided to its customers other than the Tenant Services
will be performed by taxable REIT subsidiaries of the Taxpayer or by independent
contractors from whom Taxpayer derives no income (e.g., Taxpayer will hire an
independent contractor to make major repairs to the System). Taxpayer may charge a
Tenant a separately stated charge for the performance of the Tenant Services or,
alternatively, the charge may be built into the periodic rent paid by the Tenant.
Although a specific System may have more than one Tenant and the Property
Interests and conduit piping for the System Components may benefit multiple Tenants,
each Tenant’s lease specifies the strands of fiber optic cable that are reserved for that
Tenant’s sole use and those strands are not shared with other Tenants. The coaxial
cable in indoor Systems, however, is typically shared by Tenants.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Issue 1: System Components
PLR-148908-13 7
Section 856(c)(4)(A) provides that at the close of each quarter of its taxable year,
at least 75 percent of the value of a REIT’s total assets must be represented by real
estate assets, cash and cash items (including receivables), and Government securities.
Section 856(c)(5)(B) provides that the term “real estate assets” means real
property (including interests in real property and interests in mortgages on real property)
and shares (or transferable certificates of beneficial interest) in other REITs that meet
the requirements of § 856 through § 859.
Section 1.856-3(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that the term
“real estate assets” means real property. Section 1.856-3(d) provides that the term “real
property” means land or improvements thereon, such as buildings or other inherently
permanent structures thereon (including items which are structural components of such
buildings or structures). In addition, the term “real property” includes interests in real
property. Local law definitions will not be controlling for purposes of determining the
meaning of “real property” for purposes of § 856 and the regulations thereunder. The
term “real property” includes, for example, the wiring in a building, plumbing systems,
central heating or central air-conditioning machinery, pipes or ducts, elevators or
escalators installed in a building, or other items which are structural components of a
building or other permanent structure. The term does not include assets accessory to
the operation of a business, such as machinery, printing press, transportation
equipment which is not a structural component of the building, office equipment,
refrigerators, individual air-conditioning units, grocery counters, furnishings of a motel,
hotel, or office building, even though such items may be termed fixtures under local law.
Rev. Rul. 69-94, 1969-C.B 189, addresses whether properties of a railroad,
including land with improvements or other inherently permanent structures situated
thereon, which may be under, along, or adjacent to certain lines of the railroad, and
including the tracks, roadbed, buildings, bridges and tunnels of the railroad, are real
property for purposes of § 856. The revenue ruling holds that the railroad properties
owned by a trust that are leased to another corporation are not “assets accessory to the
operation of a business” within the meaning of § 1.856-3(d), but are “real estate assets”
within the meaning of § 856(c).
Rev. Rul. 75-424, 1975-2 C.B. 269, considers whether certain assets used in
connection with the transmission and reception of microwave signals qualify as “real
property” for purposes of § 856. The ruling concludes that the building, the heating and
air conditioning system, the transmitting and receiving towers, and the chain link fencing
are “real estate assets” within the meaning of § 856(c)(5)(B). The antennae,
waveguides, transmitting, receiving, multiplex equipment, and prewired modular racks
are “assets accessory to the operation of a trade or business” and therefore not “real
estate assets” within the meaning of § 856(c)(5)(B).
PLR-148908-13 8
In this case, the System Components are designed to be parts of the larger
Systems to which they are attached. It is extremely difficult, costly, and damaging to
move any of the System Components. The System Components are intended to
function indefinitely and remain in place once installed. Similar to the tracks and other
railroad components described in Rev. Rul. 69-94, the System Components form a
passive conduit that allows a Tenant’s signal to flow through the System. The System
Components do not include any machinery or equipment that generates, transforms,
transmits, or receives a signal.
Based upon the information submitted and representations made, we conclude
that the System Components are inherently permanent structures that are not assets
accessory to the operation of a business. Accordingly, the System Components qualify
as real property for purposes of § 856.
Issue 2: Property Interests
Section 856(c)(5)(C) provides that the term “interests in real property” includes
fee ownership and co-ownership of land or improvements thereon, leaseholds of land or
improvements thereon, options to acquire land or improvements thereon, and options to
acquire leaseholds of land or improvements thereon, but does not include mineral, oil,
or gas royalty interests.
Section 1.856-3(b)(1) provides that the term “real estate assets” means real
property, interests in mortgages on real property (including interests in mortgages on
leaseholds of land or improvements thereon), and shares in other qualified REITs.
Section 1.856-3(c) provides that the term “interests in real property” includes fee
ownership and co-ownership of land or improvements thereon, leaseholds of land or
improvements thereon, options to acquire land or improvements thereon, and options to
acquire leaseholds of land or improvements thereon.
Rev. Rul. 68-291, 1968-1 C.B. 351, clarifying Rev. Rul. 59-121, 1959-1 C.B. 212,
provides generally that the consideration received for the granting of an easement
constitutes the proceeds from the sale of an interest in real property and should be
applied as a reduction of the cost or other basis of the portion of the land subject to the
easement. See also Rev. Rul. 54-575, 1954-2 C.B. 145. An easement is an interest in
real property.
Similarly, leases are included in the term “interests in real property” for purposes
of § 1.856-3(c). Although licenses, rights of way, attachment rights, and IRUs do not
convey fee ownership in the real property to which they relate, they are similar to leases
in that they authorize the holders to use the applicable real property for similar specified
terms in a manner analogous to that of leases.
PLR-148908-13 9
Accordingly, based upon the information submitted and representations made,
we conclude that the Property Interests qualify as interests in real property for purposes
of § 856(c)(5)(C).
Issue 3: Tenant Services
Section 856(c)(2) provides that at least 95 percent of a REIT’s gross income
must be derived from, among other sources, rents from real property. Section 856(c)(3)
provides that at least 75 percent of a REIT’s gross income must be derived from, among
other sources, rents from real property.
Section 856(d)(1) provides that “rents from real property” include (subject to
exclusions provided in § 856(d)(2)): (A) rents from interests in real property; (B) charges
for services customarily furnished or rendered in connection with the rental of real
property, whether or not such charges are separately stated; and (C) rent attributable to
personal property leased under, or in connection with, a lease of real property, but only
if the rent attributable to the personal property for the taxable year does not exceed
15 percent of the total rent for the taxable year attributable to both the real and personal
property leased under, or in connection with, the lease.
Section 1.856-4(a) defines the term “rents from real property” generally as the
gross amounts received for the use of, or the right to use, real property of the REIT.
Section 1.856-4(b)(1) provides that the term “rents from real property” includes charges
for services customarily furnished or rendered in connection with the rental of real
property, whether or not the charges are separately stated. Services furnished to
tenants of a particular building will be considered as customary if, in the geographic
market in which the building is located, tenants in buildings of similar class are
customarily provided with the service. Where it is customary, in a particular geographic
marketing area, to furnish electricity or other utilities to tenants in buildings of a
particular class, the submetering of utilities to tenants in such buildings will be
considered a customary service.
Section 1.856-4(b)(5)(ii) provides that the trustees or directors of a REIT are not
required to delegate or contract out their fiduciary duty to manage the trust itself, as
distinguished from rendering or furnishing services to the tenants of its property or
managing or operating the property. Thus, the trustees or directors may do all those
things necessary, in their fiduciary capacities, to manage and conduct the affairs of the
trust itself.
Section 856(d)(2)(C) provides that any impermissible tenant service income is
excluded from the definition of “rents from real property.” Section 856(d)(7)(A) defines
“impermissible tenant service income” to mean, with respect to any real or personal
property, any amount received or accrued directly or indirectly by the REIT for services
PLR-148908-13 10
furnished or rendered by the REIT to tenants at the property, or for managing or
operating the property.
Section 856(d)(7)(C) provides certain exceptions from impermissible tenant
service income. Section 856(d)(7)(C) provides that for purposes of § 856(d)(7)(A),
services furnished or rendered, or management or operation provided, through an
independent contractor from whom the REIT does not derive or receive any income or
through a taxable REIT subsidiary of the REIT shall not be treated as furnished,
rendered, or provided by the REIT, and there shall not be taken into account any
amount which would be excluded from unrelated business taxable income under
§ 512(b)(3) if received by an organization described in § 511(a)(2).
Section 512(b)(3) provides, in part, that there shall be excluded from the
computation of unrelated business taxable income all rents from real property and all
rents from personal property leased with such real property, if the rents attributable to
such personal property are an incidental amount of the total rents received or accrued
under the lease, determined at the time the personal property is placed in service.
Section 1.512(b)-1(c)(5) provides that payments for the use or occupancy of
rooms and other space where services are also rendered to the occupant, such as for
the use or occupancy of rooms or other quarters in hotels, boarding houses, or
apartment houses furnishing hotel services, or in tourist camps or tourist homes, motor
courts or motels, or for the use or occupancy of space in parking lots, warehouses, or
storage garages, do not constitute rent from real property. Generally, services are
considered rendered to the occupant if they are primarily for the occupant’s
convenience and are other than those usually or customarily rendered in connection
with the rental of rooms or other space for occupancy only. The supplying of maid
service, for example, constitutes such service; whereas the furnishing of heat and light,
the cleaning of public entrances, exits, stairways and lobbies, and the collection of trash
are not considered as services rendered to the occupant.
In Rev. Rul. 2002-38, 2002-2 C.B. 4, a REIT pays its taxable REIT subsidiary
(TRS) to provide noncustomary services to tenants. The REIT does not separately
state charges to tenants for the services. Thus, a portion of the amounts received by
the REIT from tenants represents an amount received for services provided by the TRS.
TRS employees perform all of the services and TRS pays all of the costs of providing
the services. The TRS also rents space from the REIT for carrying out its services to
tenants. The revenue ruling concludes that the services provided to the REIT’s tenants
are considered to be rendered by the TRS, rather than the REIT, for purposes of
§ 856(d)(7)(C)(i). Accordingly, the services do not give rise to impermissible tenant
service income and do not cause any portion of the rents received by the REIT to fail to
qualify as “rents from real property” under § 856(d) of the Code.
PLR-148908-13 11
Each Tenant obtains the exclusive right to use one or more separate, dedicated
fiber optic strands in a System. The System Components and the related Property
Interests are real property for purposes of § 856. Therefore, amounts received by
Taxpayer for use of the System Components and the related Property Interests qualify
as “rents from real property” under § 856(d)(1). Based upon the information submitted
and representations made, the Tenant Services are usually and customarily provided in
connection with the rental of telecommunications infrastructure similar to the Systems or
represent an exercise of the fiduciary duties of the Taxpayer’s directors in accordance
with § 1.856-4(b)(5)(ii). Accordingly, the provision by Taxpayer of the Tenant Services
does not give rise to impermissible tenant service income, and will not cause any
portion of the rents received by Taxpayer from Tenants for use of the System
Components and the related Property Interests to fail to qualify as “rents from real
property” under § 856(d).
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the facts and representations submitted by Taxpayer, we rule that:
(1) The System Components qualify as “real property” for purposes of § 856;
(2) The Property Interests qualify as “interests in real property” under
§ 856(c)(5)(C); and
(3) Subject to § 856(d)(1)(C), amounts received by Taxpayer for the use of the
System Components and the related Property Interests qualify as “rents from real
property” under § 856(d)(1). The provision by Taxpayer of the Tenant Services does
not give rise to impermissible tenant service income, and will not cause any portion of
the rents received by Taxpayer from Tenants for use of the System Components and
the related Property Interests to fail to qualify as “rents from real property” under
§ 856(d).
This ruling’s application is limited to the facts, representations, Code sections,
and regulations cited herein. Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is
expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction
or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In particular, no opinion is expressed
concerning whether Taxpayer otherwise qualifies as a REIT under subchapter M, part II
of Chapter 1 of the Code.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of
the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-148908-13 12
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this
letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
__________________________
K. Scott Brown
Branch Chief, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions & Products)
Enclosures:
Copy of this letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.