Parent receives more time to make QSub election
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An S corporation owned all of a domestic subsidiary's stock and intended to treat the subsidiary as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary from a redacted date. It failed to file Form 8869 because of inadvertence. The IRS found that the parent acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not prejudice the government's interests. It granted 120 days to file a properly executed election effective as of the intended date. The IRS did not rule that the parent was a valid S corporation or that the subsidiary was otherwise eligible to be a QSub.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the parent receive an extension to file a late QSub election for its wholly owned subsidiary?
- Outcome: Approved, 120-day extension granted
- Key authorities: IRC § 1361(b)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1361-3 and 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201450012
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/12/2014
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Numbers: 1361.00-00, 1361.05-00,
9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------, ID No. ----------------
-----------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------------------------- ------------------
-----------------------------
Refer Reply To:
--------------------------
CC:PSI:B03
PLR-112659-14
Date:
August 19, 2014
LEGEND
Parent = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
Subsidiary = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
State = ------------
Date 1 = --------------------------
Date 2 = ---------------------
Date 3 = ---------------------------
Dear --------------:
This letter responds to a letter dated March 20, 2014, and subsequent correspondence, submitted on behalf of Parent by its authorized representative, requesting relief under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations for Parent to elect to treat Subsidiary as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub).
FACTS
Parent was incorporated under the laws of State on Date 1 and elected to be treated as an S corporation effective Date 2. Subsidiary was incorporated under the laws of State on Date 3. Parent represents that, at all times on and after Date 3, Parent
PLR-112659-14
2
has owned all of the outstanding stock of Subsidiary and intended to elect to treat Subsidiary as a QSub effective Date 3. However, due to inadvertence, Parent failed to file Form 8869, Qualified Subchapter S Subsidiary Election.
LAW
Section 1361(b)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) provides that a QSub shall not be treated as a separate corporation, and all assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit of a QSub shall be treated as assets, liabilities, and such items (as the case may be) of the S corporation.
Section 1361(b)(3)(B) defines a QSub as a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation as defined in § 1361(b)(2), if 100 percent of the stock of the corporation is held by an S corporation, and the S corporation elects to treat the corporation as a QSub.
Section 1.1361-3(a) of the Income Tax Regulations provides the time and manner of making a QSub election. Section 1.1361-3(a)(2) provides that an S corporation makes a QSub election with respect to a subsidiary by filing a Form 8869 with the appropriate service center. Section § 1.1361-3(a)(4) provides that a QSub election cannot be effective more than two months and 15 days prior to the date of filing.
Section 1.1361-3(a)(6) provides that an extension of time to make a QSub election may be available under procedures applicable under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3.
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but not more than 6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
CONCLUSION
PLR-112659-14
3
Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that Parent has satisfied the requirements of § 301.9100-3 with respect to the late QSub election for Subsidiary. Accordingly, Parent is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to file a properly executed Form 8869 with the appropriate service center, effective Date 3. A copy of this letter should be attached to the election.
Except as expressly provided herein, we express or imply no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion as to whether Parent is a valid S corporation or whether Subsidiary is eligible to be a QSub.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this letter to your authorized representative.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
By:__/s/_____
Mary Beth Carchia
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes
cc:
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace