Private Letter Ruling 201449012 Released December 5, 2014 Approved Transcribed from scan

Misrouted Roth recharacterization receives 60-day extension

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer directed a custodian to recharacterize a Roth conversion back to the qualified retirement plan that had supplied the funds. Before the deadline, the custodian said the request was ready for processing, but after the deadline it explained that the transfer had to go to a traditional IRA instead. The IRS found that the failure resulted from events beyond the taxpayer's control and that the relevant limitations period remained open. It granted 60 days from the ruling date to complete the recharacterization to a traditional IRA.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer receive additional time to recharacterize a Roth conversion after the custodian rejected the requested destination too late for correction?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 408A(d); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.408A-5 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 201449012
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

SEP 11 2014

T:EP:RA:T2

Uniform Issue List: 9100.00-00; 408A.00-00





Legend:

Taxpayer = ***
Custodian =
****
Amount = ***
Account =
**** ***** *
*** ****
IRA Y =
***** ******
******

Dear ***:

This is in response to your request dated August 20, 2012, submitted on your
behalf by your authorized representative, as supplemented by correspondence dated
December 10, 2012, and June 30, 2014, in which you request relief under section
301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administrative Regulations (the "P&A Regulations").
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the ruling requested.

On December 29, 2010, Taxpayer requested that Amount be transferred from
Account, a qualified retirement plan, to IRA Y, a Roth IRA described in section 408A of
the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), as a Roth IRA conversion. On October 13, 2011,

2 201449012

Taxpayer requested through Custodian’s IRA Request for Recharacterization form (the
“Request”) to recharacterize IRA Y to Account. Taxpayer called Custodian on October
14, 2011, to determine if his Request was received and in good order for processing.
Taxpayer was advised by Custodian that his Request was in good order for processing
and no further action was required. On October 19, 2011, Custodian performed a
subsequent review of the Request and determined that the Request was not in good
order because the Request directed the Roth IRA to be recharacterized to Account, a
qualified retirement plan. Custodian informed Taxpayer that that it would be unable to
process the recharacterization of the 2010 Roth IRA because Taxpayer was not
permitted to recharacterize his Roth IRA to a qualified retirement plan, but to a
Traditional IRA.

Accordingly, even though Taxpayer requested to recharacterize IRA Y prior to
the deadline of October 17, 2011 (“Deadline”), Taxpayer was not notified of this inability
to recharacterize IRA Y into a qualified plan until after the Deadline to re-characterize
into a Traditional IRA had passed. As such, Taxpayer was not advised of the need to
recharacterize IRA Y into another IRA until the time to do so had passed.

The statute of limitations on Taxpayer's 2010 Federal Income Tax Return
remains open.

Based on the foregoing facts and representations, you have requested a ruling
that, pursuant to section 301.9100-3 of the P&A Regulations, Taxpayer may be granted
an extension of time from the date of issuance of this ruling to make an election under
section 1.408A-5 of the Income Tax Regulations (the “I.T. Regulations”) to
recharacterize Amount as a contribution to a Traditional IRA.

With respect to your request for relief under section 301.9100-3 of the P&A
Regulations, section 408A(d)(6) of the Code and section 1.408A-5 of the I.T.
Regulations provide that, except as otherwise provided by the Secretary, a taxpayer
may elect to recharacterize an IRA contribution made to one type of IRA as having been
made to another type of IRA by making a trustee-to-trustee transfer of the IRA
contribution, plus earnings, to the other type of IRA. In a recharacterization, the IRA
contribution is treated as having been made to the transferee IRA and not the transferor
IRA. Under section 408A(d)(6) of the Code and section 1.408A-5 of the I.T.
Regulations, this recharacterization election generally must occur on or before the date
prescribed by law, including extensions, for filing the taxpayer's Federal Income Tax
Return for the year of contribution.

Section 1.408A-5, Q&A-6, of the I.T. Regulations describes how a taxpayer
makes the election to recharacterize the IRA contribution. To recharacterize an amount
that has been converted from a Traditional IRA to a Roth IRA: (1) the taxpayer must
notify the Roth IRA trustee of the taxpayer's intent to recharacterize the amount: (2) the
taxpayer must provide the trustee (and the transferee trustee, if different from the

3 201449012

transferor trustee) with specified information that is sufficient to effect the
recharacterization: and (3), the trustee must make the transfer.

Sections 301.9100-1, 301.9100-2, and 301.9100-3 of the P&A Regulations, in
general, provide guidance concerning requests for relief submitted to the Service on or
after December 31, 1997. Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue, in his discretion, may grant a reasonable extension of the time fixed
by a regulation, a revenue ruling, a revenue procedure, a notice, or an announcement
published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin for the making of an election or application for
relief in respect of tax under, among others, Subtitle A of the Code.

Section 301.9100-2 of the P&A Regulations lists certain elections for which
automatic extensions of time to file are granted. Section 301.9100-3 generally provides
guidance with respect to the granting of relief with respect to those elections not
referenced in section 301.9100-2. The relief requested in this case is not referenced in
section 301.9100-2.

Section 301.9100-3 of the P&A Regulations provides that applications for relief
that fall within section 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides sufficient
evidence (including affidavits described in section 301.9100-3(e)(2)) to establish that (1)
the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and (2) granting relief would not
prejudice the interests of the Government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) of the P&A Regulations provides that a taxpayer will be
deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith (i) if its request for section
301.9100-1 relief is filed before the failure to make a timely election is discovered by the
Service; (ii) if the taxpayer inadvertently failed to make the election because of
intervening events beyond the taxpayer's control; (iii) if the taxpayer failed to make the
election because, after exercising reasonable diligence, the taxpayer was unaware of
the necessity for the election; (iv) the taxpayer reasonably relied upon the written advice
of the Service; or (v) the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional,
including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to
make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) of the P&A Regulations provides that ordinarily the
interests of the Government will be treated as prejudiced and that ordinarily the Service
will not grant relief when tax years that would have been affected by the election had it
been timely made are closed by the statute of limitations before the taxpayer's receipt of
a ruling granting relief under this section.

In the present case, Taxpayer's failure to elect to recharacterize the Roth IRA on
or before the date prescribed by law, including extensions, for filing his Federal Income
Tax Return for the year of contribution, was caused by intervening events beyond
Taxpayer's control. Taxpayer's failure resulted from the processing of the Request by
Custodian where Taxpayer was diligent by contacting Custodian and received

4 201449012

assurance prior to the Deadline that the Request was in good order with no further
action required and was notified by Custodian only after the Deadline had expired that
the Request could not be processed.

Based on the above, Taxpayer meets the requirements of section 301.9100-
3(b)(1) of the P&A Regulations, clauses (i) and (ii), for the 2010 tax year. In addition,
since the statute of limitations is still open, under section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) of the P&A
Regulations, granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of 60 days as measured from the
date of the issuance of this ruling letter to recharacterize Amount as a contribution to a
Traditional IRA.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described
herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which
may be applicable thereto.

This letter assumes that the above IRA qualifies under either section 408 of the
Code or section 408A of the Code at all relevant times.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter ruling
is being sent to your authorized representative.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact ** at () -
***. Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T2.

Sincerely yours

Jason E. Levine, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 2

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of this letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.