Hospitalization and agent resignation support rollover waiver
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A taxpayer authorized an agent to consolidate her investment accounts, but the agent deposited an IRA distribution into a non-IRA account and then abruptly resigned without explaining the rollover deadline. During the same period, the taxpayer and her husband were hospitalized, the taxpayer entered rehabilitation, and her husband entered a nursing home. The IRS concluded that the missed deadline resulted from the lack of information and the couple's health problems. It waived the 60-day rollover requirement and allowed another 60 days to move the funds into an IRA.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Would the IRS waive the 60-day IRA rollover deadline after the taxpayer's agent resigned and both spouses experienced serious health problems?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC § 408(d)(3)(I); Rev. Proc. 2003-16
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 201449010
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
SEP 10 2014
Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00
T:EP:RA:T3
Legend:
Taxpayer A =
IRA X =
Bank B =
Company C =
Individual D =
Amount E =
Dear :
This is in response to your request dated March 14, 2014 in which you request a
waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code (the “Code”).
Taxpayer A claims that her failure to accomplish a timely rollover was due to both
a lack of information following the abrupt resignation of her agent, Individual D, and
health issues of both herself and her husband.
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of
perjury in support of the ruling requested:
Taxpayer A maintained IRA X at Company C. Taxpayer A had executed a
Durable Power of Attorney giving Individual D authority to take various actions on her
behalf. Taxpayer A represents that she requested that Individual D consolidate her
various investment accounts into Bank B. In July 2013, Individual D withdrew Amount E
2 201449010
from IRA X and deposited it, along with other funds, into Taxpayers A’s non-IRA
account at Bank B. Within a month of this withdrawal, Individual D abruptly resigned
and failed to explain to Taxpayer A that Amount E was a distribution from IRA X and
should be rolled over within the next few weeks to avoid taxation of such amounts.
During the same period of time that this was happening, both Taxpayer A and
her husband were hospitalized. Taxpayer A then had to go to a rehabilitation facility,
where she remained for several weeks. Taxpayer A’s husband was then admitted to a
nursing home facility.
Taxpayer A relied on Individual D to handle the financial aspects of the
consolidation of her accounts, and to advise her with respect to them. Individual D did
not rollover Amount E, and resigned without advising Taxpayer A of the need to rollover
the amount withdrawn from IRA X within the remainder of the 60-day period. Taxpayer
A represents that Amount E has not been used for any other purpose
Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal
Revenue Service waive the 60 day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3)
of the Code with respect to the distribution of Amount E.
Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in
section 408(d) of the Code, any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be
included in gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner
provided under section 72 of the Code.
Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA
rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code
does not apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for
whose benefit the IRA is maintained if:
(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the day on
which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or
(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not
later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received,
except that the maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the
portion of the amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without
regard to section 408(d)(3) of the Code).
Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) of the Code
does not apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) of the Code received
by an individual from an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of
3 201449010
such receipt such individual received any other amount described in section
408(d)(3)(A)(i) of the Code from an IRA which was not includible in gross income
because of the application of section 408(d)(3) of the Code.
Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for
partial rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section
408(d) of the Code do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section
408(a)(6) of the Code.
Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-
day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the
failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual
subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001,
are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.
Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in
determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to
section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and
circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to
complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions
imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for
example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the
time elapsed since the distribution occurred.
The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is
consistent with her assertion that her failure to accomplish a timely rollover was due to
both a lack of information following the abrupt resignation of her agent, Individual D, and
health issues of both herself and her husband.
Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby
waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount E from
IRA X. Taxpayer A is granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of this ruling letter
to transfer Amount E to an IRA. Provided all other requirements of section 408(d)(3) of
the Code, except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such contribution, the
contribution of Amount E will be considered a rollover contribution within the meaning of
section 408(d)(3) of the Code.
This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be
distributed by section 408(a)(6) of the Code.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described
herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which
may be applicable thereto.
4 201449010
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact (ID )
at ( ) - . Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T3.
Sincerely yours,
Laura B. Warshawsky, Manager,
Employee Plans Technical Group 3
Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.