Taxpayer receives more time to undo Roth IRA conversion

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer converted part of a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA in 2010 after receiving advice and a projection while she was single. She married that year and filed jointly, which made the tax cost of the conversion much greater than the estimate, but her advisers did not explain the effect of the marital-status change before the recharacterization deadline. She discovered the problem only after filing her next return and requested regulatory relief. The IRS found that she reasonably relied on professional advice and that the relevant limitations period remained open, so granting relief would not prejudice the government. It gave her 60 days to recharacterize the Roth IRA as a traditional IRA.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Could the taxpayer receive an extension to recharacterize a 2010 Roth IRA conversion after relying on advisers who did not explain the tax effect of her marriage?
• Outcome: Approved
• Key authorities: IRC § 408A(d)(6); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.408A-5 and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 201448034
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

SEP 02 2014

Uniform Issue List: 408A.00-00

XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX

SE:T:EP:RA:T1

Legend:

Taxpayer A = XXXXXXXXXXXXX
IRA B = XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Roth IRA C = XXXXXXXXXXXXX

Financial Institution D = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.

Financial Institution E = XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX

CPA Firm F = XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Financial Advisor G = XXXXXXXXXXXXX

Accountant H = XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Amount 1 = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXX:

This is in response to your request dated July 15, 2013, as supplemented by
correspondence received on December 20, 2013, January 21, 2014, February
23, 2014, and June 21, 2014, in which your authorized representative requests
relief under section 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations
("Regulations") on your behalf.

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalties of
perjury in support of the ruling requested:

Taxpayer A maintained IRA B with Financial Institution D. In December 2010,
Taxpayer A transferred and converted a portion of IRA B totaling Amount 1 into
Roth IRA C maintained by Financial Institution D.

2 201448034

Taxpayer A represents that in 2009, when she was single, Financial Advisor G
with Financial Institution E recommended that she consider making a Roth
conversion. Taxpayer A also received a financial projection from Accountant H
with CPA Firm F as to how a conversion would affect her 2010 tax return. In
2010, acting on Financial Advisor G’s recommendation, Taxpayer A converted
Amount 1 from IRA B to Roth IRA C.

Taxpayer A was married in 2010 and filed her 2010 tax return on time without
extension using the married filing jointly status. Under the two-year deferral of
recognition of income for Roth IRA conversions made in 2010, Taxpayer A did
not report any income from her Roth IRA conversion on her 2010 tax return.
Taxpayer A was unaware at the time of 2010 tax return filing that the tax liability
on the Roth conversion would be substantially greater than the original estimate
given to her by Accountant H due to her change in marital status and the taxable
income of her husband. Taxpayer A's deadline for making such
recharacterization was October 17, 2011, which was the last date, including
extensions, for filing an income return for 2010, the year of the conversion. At no
time was Taxpayer A advised of the effect that a change in marital status would
have on her Roth IRA conversion until after the allowed timeframe to unwind the
conversion.

It was only after Taxpayer A filed her 2011 return that she realized the extent of
the additional tax and that she had missed the opportunity to recharacterize the
Roth conversion. Taxpayer A has not received any notice or other
communication from the Internal Revenue Service regarding her failure to effect
a timely recharacterization.

Based on your submission and the above facts and representations, you request
a ruling that pursuant to section 301.9100-3 of the Regulations, Taxpayer A be
granted an extension of time to recharacterize Roth IRA C as a traditional IRA.

With respect to Taxpayer A’s request for relief under section 301.9100-3 of the
Regulations, section 408A(d)(6) of the Code and section 1.408A-5 of the Federal
Income Tax Regulations (“I.T. Regulations”) provide that, except as otherwise
provided by the Secretary, a taxpayer may elect to recharacterize a Roth IRA
contribution made to one type of IRA as having been made to another type of
IRA by making a trustee-to-trustee transfer of the IRA contribution, plus earnings,
to the other type of IRA. In a recharacterization, the IRA contribution is treated as
having been made to the transferee IRA and not the transferor IRA. Under
section 408A(d)(6) of the Code and section 1.408A-5 of the I.T. Regulations, this
recharacterization election, generally, must occur on or before the date
prescribed by law, including extensions, for filing the taxpayer's federal income
tax return for the year of the IRA contributions.

Section 1.408A-5, Question & Answer (“Q&A”)-6 of the I.T. Regulations
describes how a taxpayer makes the election to recharacterize the IRA
contribution. To recharacterize an amount that either has been contributed to a
Roth IRA or that has been converted from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA: (1) the

3 201448034

taxpayer must notify the Roth IRA trustee of the taxpayer's intent to
recharacterize the amount; (2) the taxpayer must provide the trustee (and the
transferee trustee, if different from the transferor trustee) with specified
information that is sufficient to effect the recharacterization; and, (3) the trustee
must make the transfer.

Sections 301.9100-1, 301.9100-2, and 301.9100-3 of the Regulations provide
guidance concerning requests for relief submitted to the Service on or after
December 31, 1997.

Section 301.9100-1(c) of the Regulations provides that the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue, in his discretion, may grant a reasonable extension of the time
fixed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, a revenue procedure, a notice, or an
announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin for the making of an
election or application for relief in respect of tax under, among others, Subtitle A
of the Code.

Section 301.9100-2 of the Regulations lists certain elections for which automatic
extensions of time to file are granted. Section 301.9100-3 generally provides
guidance with respect to the granting of relief with respect to those elections not
referenced in section 301.9100-2. The relief requested in this case is not
referenced in section 301.9100-2.

Section 301.9100-3 of the Regulations provides that applications for relief that fall
within section 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides sufficient
evidence (including affidavits described in section 301.9100-3(e)(2)) to establish
that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and (2) granting relief
would not prejudice the interests of the Government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) of the Regulations provides that a taxpayer will be
deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith (i) if its request for section
301.9100-1 relief is filed before the failure to make a timely election is discovered
by the Service; (ii) if the taxpayer inadvertently failed to make the election
because of intervening events beyond the taxpayer's control; (iii) if the taxpayer
failed to make the election because, after exercising reasonable diligence, the
taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the election; (iv) the taxpayer
reasonably relied upon the written advice of the Service; or (v) the taxpayer
reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional
employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the
taxpayer to make, the election.

Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) of the Regulations provides that ordinarily the
interests of the Government will be treated as prejudiced and that ordinarily the
Service will not grant relief when tax years that would have been affected by the
election had it been timely made are closed by the statute of limitations before
the taxpayer's receipt of a ruling granting relief under this section.

4

201448034

In this case, Taxpayer A failed to recharacterize her Roth IRA C back to a
traditional IRA by the time permitted by law. Therefore, it is necessary to
determine whether Taxpayer A is eligible for relief under the provisions of section
301.9100-3 of the Regulations. In filing her 2011 Return, Taxpayer A failed to
make the special election to recharacterize the Roth conversion. Taxpayer A
represents that despite her efforts to comply with applicable rules, she was not
timely advised by her tax advisor of the tax implications her change in marital
status would have on her Roth conversion. Taxpayer A did not discover her
mistake until after the due date for recharacterizing the 2010 Roth conversion
had passed.

Thus, Taxpayer A satisfies clause (v) of section 301.9100-3(b)(1) of the
Regulations because she reasonably relied on the advice of Financial Advisor G
concerning the Roth IRA conversion rules. In addition, because the statute of
limitations on the Taxpayer A’s 2011 return remains open, the interests of the
government would not be prejudiced by providing relief.

Accordingly, we rule that, pursuant to section 301.9100-3 of the Regulations,
Taxpayer A is granted a period not to exceed 60 days from the date of this letter
to recharacterize Roth IRA C as a traditional IRA.

This letter assumes that the above IRAs qualify under section 408 of the Code or
section 408A of the Code at all relevant times.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Code section
6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter ruling
is being sent to your authorized representative.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact XXXXXXXXXX
(Identification No. XXXXXXX) at (XXX) XXX-XXXX. Please address all
correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T1.

Sincerely yours,

Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose