Withholding error supports 60-day rollover waiver
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A taxpayer directed a financial institution to roll her entire qualified-plan balance directly into an IRA. The institution transferred only 80 percent and mistakenly sent the remaining 20 percent to the IRS as federal income tax withholding, despite the taxpayer's direct-rollover instructions. The taxpayer did not discover the error until the institution issued Forms 1099-R after the 60-day rollover period had expired. The institution acknowledged its mistake. Because the missed deadline resulted from a financial-institution error, the IRS waived the 60-day requirement and gave the taxpayer another 60 days to contribute the withheld amount to an IRA.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Would the IRS waive the 60-day rollover deadline for an amount mistakenly withheld from a requested direct rollover?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a)(31) and 402(c)(3)(B); Rev. Proc. 2003-16
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 201448033
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
SEP 04 2014
Uniform Issue List: 402.08-00
SE:T:EP:RA:T3
Legend:
Taxpayer A = ***
Financial Institution B = ***
Amount C = ***
Amount D = ***
Plan X = ***
IRA Y = ***
Dear * * *:
This is in response to your request dated June 23, 2014, in which you requested
a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 402(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code).
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of
perjury in support of the ruling requested.
Taxpayer A represents that she received a distribution from Plan X totaling
Amount C, in the form of a direct rollover, from which Amount D was improperly
withheld for federal income tax. Taxpayer A asserts that her failure to accomplish a
rollover of Amount D within the 60-day period prescribed by section 402(c)(3) was due
to an error committed by Financial Institution B that was not discovered until after the
60-day period had expired.
On December 27, 2012, Taxpayer A submitted a distribution request to Financial
Institution B, directing them to distribute, in a direct rollover, her entire balance under
Plan X to an Individual Retirement Account (IRA), IRA Y. Financial Institution B’s
Page 2 201448033
distribution form completed by Taxpayer A provides that the “following distributions are
not subject to the mandatory 20% federal tax withholding: Direct rollover to an eligible
retirement plan.” Taxpayer A elected a direct rollover to IRA Y in section 5.F. of
Financial Institution B’s form.
Financial Institution B did not distribute Taxpayer A’s account under Plan X
correctly. On January 14, 2013, Financial Institution B transferred 80% of Taxpayer A's
account balance under Plan X to IRA Y as a direct rollover, instead of transferring 100%
of Taxpayer A’s Plan X account balance to IRA Y as Taxpayer A had requested. The
remaining 20% of Taxpayer A’s account balance in Plan X, Amount D, was remitted as
federal income tax withholding. The distribution paperwork completed by Taxpayer A
and submitted to Financial Institution B stated that the retirement plan funds held in Plan
X should have been transferred to IRA Y via a direct rollover and no federal income tax
should have been withheld. Financial Institution B has acknowledged that it should have
transferred 100% of Taxpayer A’s balance in Plan X to IRA Y, and that remitting 20% of
the balance as federal income tax withholding was its mistake.
Taxpayer A was unaware of Financial Institution B’s error until January of 2014,
when Financial Institution B issued Form 1099-Rs to the taxpayer with respect to the
Plan X distribution made in 2013. The 1099-Rs revealed that Financial Institution B
improperly remitted Amount D as federal income tax withholding from the January 14,
2013, Plan X distribution. However, by January of 2014, the 60-day rollover period to
contribute these amounts to the taxpayer's IRA had expired.
Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal
Revenue Service (Service) waive the 60 day rollover requirement in section 402(c)(3) of
the Code with respect to Amount D.
Section 402(c) of the Code provides that if any portion of the balance to the credit
of an employee in a qualified trust is paid to the employee in an eligible rollover
distribution, and the distributee transfers any portion of the property received in such
distribution to an eligible retirement plan, and in the case of a distribution of property
other than money, the amount so transferred consists of the property distributed, then
such distribution (to the extent transferred) shall not be includible in gross income for
the taxable year in which paid. Section 402(c)(3)(A) states that such rollover must be
accomplished within 60 days following the day on which the distributee received the
property. An individual retirement account constitutes one form of eligible retirement
plan.
Section 402(c)(4) of the Code provides that an eligible rollover distribution shall
not include any distribution to the extent such distribution is required under section
401(a)(9).
Section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code provides, in relevant part, that the Secretary
may waive the 60-day requirement under section 402(c) where the failure to waive such
requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or
other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such
Page 3 201448033
requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for
the waiver under section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code.
Section 401(a)(31) provides the rules governing “direct transfers of eligible
rollover distributions”.
Section 1.401(a)(31)-1, Q&A-15, of the Federal Income Tax Regulations
(Regulations), provides in relevant part, that an eligible rollover distribution that is paid
to an eligible retirement plan in a direct rollover is a distribution and rollover, and not a
transfer of assets and liabilities.
Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, (January 27, 2003), provides that in
determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to
section 402(c)(3) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and
circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to
complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions
imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for
example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the
time elapsed since the distribution occurred.
The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is
consistent with her assertion that her failure to accomplish a timely rollover of Amount D
was due to an error committed by Financial Institution B that was not discovered until
after the 60-day period had expired.
Therefore, pursuant to section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code, the Service hereby
waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to Amount D from Plan X. Taxpayer
A is granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of this ruling letter to contribute
Amount D into an IRA. Provided all other requirements of section 402(c)(3) of the Code,
except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such contribution, the
contribution of Amount D into an IRA will be considered a rollover contribution within the
meaning of section 402(c)(3) of the Code.
This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be
distributed by section 401(a)(9) of the Code.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described
herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or Regulations which
may be applicable thereto.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of
the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Page 4 201448033
If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact * * *
. Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T3.
Sincerely yours,
Laura B. Warshawsky, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 3
Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.