REIT stock-or-cash dividends receive distribution treatment
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A publicly traded real estate investment trust planned dividends in which shareholders could elect to receive stock or cash. The REIT would make at least 20 percent of each distribution's value available in cash, prorating cash elections if they exceeded the limit, while paying nonelecting and stock-electing shareholders in stock. The IRS ruled that all stock and cash paid under the arrangement would be treated as a § 301 distribution because shareholders could choose cash. Stock received would be valued at the cash that the shareholder could have taken instead. Differences caused by elections, proration, or market-price changes would not make the distributions preferential under § 562(c).
Ruling snapshot
- Question: How would elective stock-or-cash REIT dividends with a minimum 20 percent cash pool be treated under §§ 301, 305, and 562?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 301, 305(b)(1), and 562(c); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.305-1(b)(2) and 1.305-2(b)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201448016 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 11/28/2014 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 305.00-00, 301.00-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------- ------------------------, ID No. ------------
---------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------- --------------------
---------------------------- Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------- CC:CORP:BO4
PLR-114418-14
Date:
August 04, 2014
Legend
Taxpayer = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
Exchange = -----------------------------------
State A = ------------
Date 1 = --------------------------
Date 2 = --------------------------
Dear -------------:
This letter responds to a March 21, 2014 letter requesting rulings under §§ 301, 305, and 562
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The information received in
that request is summarized below.
SUMMARY OF FACTS
Taxpayer, a State A corporation, is an accrual basis taxpayer that files federal income tax
returns as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) on a calendar-year basis. Taxpayer for all
relevant periods represents that it qualifies as a REIT and intends to maintain such
qualification. Taxpayer has one class of common stock outstanding (the “Common Stock”),
which is publicly traded and listed on the Exchange. All references to “shareholders” herein
refer to holders of Common Stock.
Taxpayer intends to make one or more distributions with respect to its Common Stock for the
taxable years ending on Date 1 and Date 2 (the “Proposed Distributions”). Taxpayer will
make the Proposed Distributions in the form of a combination of Common Stock and cash.
Each shareholder will have the right to elect to receive its portion of a Proposed Distribution
in the form of either 100 percent Common Stock (“Stock election”) or 100 percent cash
PLR-114418-14 2
(“Cash election”). If a shareholder fails to make a valid election, that shareholder will be
deemed to have made an election to receive its portion of the Proposed Distribution in the
form of 100 percent Common Stock.
While each shareholder will have the option to elect to receive cash in lieu of Common Stock
for its portion of a Proposed Distribution, Taxpayer will limit the aggregate amount of cash to
be distributed in a Proposed Distribution to an amount not less than 20 percent of the total
value of the Proposed Distribution (“Cash Limit”). In no event will the total amount of cash
available in a Proposed Distribution be less 20 percent. To the extent necessary, Taxpayer
will issue cash in lieu of fractional shares of Common Stock. Any cash paid in lieu of
fractional shares of Common Stock will not count towards the Cash Limit.
If for any Proposed Distribution the total number of shares of Common Stock for which an
election to receive cash is made would result in the payment of cash in an aggregate amount
that is less than or equal to the Cash Limit, then i) each shareholder electing to receive cash
will receive its portion of the Proposed Distribution entirely in cash, and ii) each shareholder
electing to receive Common Stock will receive its portion of the Proposed Distribution entirely
in Common Stock.
If the total number of shares of Common Stock for which an election to receive cash is made
would result in the payment of cash in an aggregate amount that is in excess of the Cash
Limit, then i) each shareholder electing to receive cash will receive a prorated amount of the
available cash, and will receive their remaining portion of the Proposed Distribution in
Common Stock, and ii) each shareholder electing to receive stock will receive the entire
Proposed Distribution in Common Stock. In no event will a shareholder electing to receive
cash receive less than 20 percent of its portion of the Proposed Distribution in cash.
The total number of shares of Common Stock to be issued in each Proposed Distribution will
be determined by dividing i) the total amount of the Proposed Distribution, less the amount of
cash to be paid (not to exceed the Cash Limit), by ii) the volume-weighted average trading
price of a share of Common Stock on the Exchange as of a to be determined date, which will
be on or around the shareholder election deadline for the Proposed Distribution. Taxpayer
will pay the Proposed Distribution as soon as reasonably practicable, anticipated by Taxpayer
to be within two weeks following the shareholder election deadline.
Taxpayer does not currently have a dividend reinvestment plan (“DRIP”) in effect, but for any
shareholder participating in a future DRIP, the DRIP would apply only to the extent of the
cash the shareholder would have received in the Proposed Distribution in the absence of the
DRIP.
RULINGS
Based solely on the information provided and the representations made, we rule as follows
with respect to the Proposed Distributions:
1) Any and all of the Common Stock and cash distributed in a Proposed Distribution by the
Taxpayer, will be treated as a distribution of cash and property with respect to its stock to
which section 301 applies. §§ 301, 305(b)(1).
PLR-114418-14 3
2) The amount of the distribution of Common Stock will be considered equal to the amount
of cash which could have been received instead by such shareholder. Treas. Reg.
§§ 1.305-1(b)(2), 1.305-2(b), Ex. 2.
3) The terms of the Stock and Cash Distributions, as described in this letter, will not cause
the Stock and Cash Distributions to be considered preferential under section 562(c).
Accordingly, if, under those terms, a shareholder receives a combination of stock and
money that differs from the combination received by another shareholder and if the fair
market value of the stock on the date of distribution differs from the amount of money
which could have been received instead, those differences will not cause the distribution
to be considered preferential under section 562(c).
CAVEATS
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax
consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.
In particular, no opinion is expressed with regard to whether Taxpayer qualifies as a REIT
under subchapter M of the Code.
PROCEDURAL STATEMENTS
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number (PLR-114418-
14) of the letter ruling.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted
by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an
appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support
of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
Pursuant to the power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter will be sent to
your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
____________________________
Marlene P. Oppenheim
Senior Counsel, Branch 5
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.