Private Letter Ruling 201447023 Released November 21, 2014 Approved

Refinancing loans qualify under student loan bond program

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A state authority planned to issue bonds to refinance its existing tax-exempt bonds and use the proceeds to consolidate student loans for current borrowers. The original loans were made under a state-approved program, met the loan-size limit, and were issued to students who then lived or studied in the state. The new loans would not exceed the outstanding principal plus capitalized or accrued interest, and the refunding bonds would trace their volume cap to the same state. The IRS ruled that the refinancing loans would be student loans made under a program described in IRC § 144(b)(1)(B).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Will the loans funded with the refunding bond proceeds qualify as student loans under IRC § 144(b)(1)(B)?
  • Outcome: Approved, the refinancing loans qualify under the described student loan program
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 103, 141(e), 144(b), 146, and 148; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.103-7(d) and 1.148-9

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201447023 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 11/21/2014 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 144.02-00
Person To Contact:


-----------------------, ID No. --------------

Telephone Number:

----------------------

Refer Reply To:

CC:FIP:5

PLR-133996-13
Date:
August 01, 2014

Legend

Authority = --------------------------------------------------

State = --------------------------------------------------------------------

Bonds = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear ------------------:

This letter is in response to your request for a ruling that loans to be made with
proceeds of the Bonds will be student loans under a program described in section
144(b)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”).

FACTS AND REPRESENTATIONS

The Authority provides financial assistance, including loans, to enable qualified students
to obtain a post-secondary education. The Authority intends to issue the Bonds and
use the proceeds of the Bonds in a program to fund loans to refinance outstanding
student loans (the “Consolidation Loan Program”). The Consolidation Loan Program
will be a program of general application approved by the State to refinance one or more
outstanding student loans (“Original Loans”) of a borrower with a single loan. The
Consolidation Loan Program will not be a program described in section 144(b)(1)(A).
The primary purpose of the Consolidated Loan Program is to reduce the interest rate on
the student loan notes of the Authority’s current borrowers (“Current Borrowers”) as the
Authority refinances its outstanding bonds at lower interest rates. Also, the Authority
and borrowers will benefit from the efficiencies of servicing and paying, respectively,
single loans.

PLR-133996-13 2

The Authority will use the proceeds of the Bonds to refinance certain Original Loans of
its Current Borrowers. These Original Loans are loans, as further described below, that
the Authority originally financed (“Authority’s Original Loans”) with proceeds of tax-
exempt bonds (the “Prior Bonds”). Authority’s Original Loans were made to student
borrowers under a program of general application approved by the State and not
described in section 144(b)(1)(A). The loans under this program meet the size limitation
of section 144(b)(1)(B). Volume cap was allocated by the State to the Prior Bonds. At
the time the Authority made Authority’s Original Loans, the Current Borrowers were
students that were either State residents or attending institutions of higher education
within the State, although the Current Borrowers may no longer be residents of the
State. The amounts of the refinancing loans to be made with proceeds of the Bonds
(the “Refinancing Loans”) will not exceed the respective Current Borrowers’ outstanding
principal amounts of Authority’s Original Loans plus any interest capitalized to or
accrued on the Authority’s Original Loans.

LAW

Section 103(a) provides that, except as provided in section 103(b), gross income does
not include interest on any state or local bond. Section 103(b) provides, in part, that
section 103(a) shall not apply to any private activity bond which is not a qualified bond
(within the meaning of section 141) or any arbitrage bond (within the meaning of section
148).

Section 141(e) provides, in part, that a “qualified student loan bond” is a “qualified bond”
if such bond is issued as part of an issue which meets the applicable requirements of
section 146 and such bond meets the applicable requirements of each subsection of
section 147.

Section 144(b)(1) provides, in part, that the term “qualified student loan bond” means
any bond issued as part of an issue the applicable percentage or more of the net
proceeds of which are to be used directly or indirectly to make or finance student loans
under a program described in section 144(b)(1)(B). Section 144(b)(1)(B) describes a
program of general application approved by the state if no loan under such program
exceeds the difference between the total cost of attendance and other forms of student
assistance (not including loans pursuant to section 428B(a)(1) of the Higher Education
Act of 1965 (relating to parent loans) or subpart 1 of part C of title VII of the Public
Health Service Act (relating to student assistance)) for which the student borrower may
be eligible. A program shall not be treated as described in section 144(b)(1)(B) if such
program is described in section 144(b)(1)(A) (relating to a program to which the Higher
Education Act of 1965 applies).

Section 144(b)(3) provides that a student loan shall be treated as being made or
financed under a program described in section 144(b)(1) with respect to an issue only if
the student is (A) a resident of the state from which the volume cap under section 146

PLR-133996-13 3

for such loan was derived, or (B) enrolled at an educational institution located in such
state.

Section 146(a) provides that a private activity bond issued as part of an issue meets the
requirements of this section if the aggregate face amount of the private activity bonds
issued pursuant to such issue, when added to the aggregate face amount of tax-exempt
private activity bonds previously issued by the issuing authority during the calendar
year, does not exceed such authority’s volume cap for such calendar year. Section
146(i) provides that, for purposes of the volume cap imposed by section 146, (1) the
term “private activity bond” shall not include any bond which is issued to refund another
bond to the extent that the amount of such bond does not exceed the outstanding
amount of the refunded bond and (2) in the case of any qualified student loan bond,
section 146(i)(1) shall apply only if the maturity date of the refunding bond is not later
than the later of (A) the average maturity date of the qualified student loan bonds to be
refunded by the issue of which the refunding bond is a part, or (B) the date 17 years
after the date on which the refunded bond was issued (or in the case of a series of
refundings, the date on which the original bond was issued).

Section 148(a) provides that, for purposes of section 103, the term “arbitrage bond”
means any bond issued as part of an issue any portion of the proceeds of which are
reasonably expected (at the time of issuance of the bonds) to be used directly or
indirectly to acquire higher yielding investments or to replace funds which were used
directly or indirectly to acquire higher yielding investments. For purposes of section
148(a), a bond shall be treated as an arbitrage bond if the issuer intentionally uses any
portion of the proceeds of the issue of which such bond is a part in a manner described
above.

Section 1.103-7(d)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that in the case
of an issue of obligations issued to refund the outstanding face amount of an issue of
obligations, the proceeds of the refunding issue will be considered to be used for the
purpose for which the proceeds of the issue to be refunded were used. Section 1.148-
9(b)(1) provides, in part, that when proceeds of the refunding issue discharge any of the
outstanding principal amounts of the prior issue, proceeds of the prior issue become
transferred proceeds of the refunding issue and cease to be proceeds of the prior issue.
Section 1.148-9(c)(1) provides rules regarding the allowable allocation methods for the
investments corresponding to those transferred proceeds.

ANALYSIS

The Bonds will be refunding bonds of the Prior Bonds. The proceeds of the Bonds,
thus, will be considered to be used for the purpose for which the proceeds of the Prior
Bonds were used.

PLR-133996-13 4

The Authority represents that Authority’s Original Loans were made under a program of
general application approved by the State and not described in section 144(b)(1)(A).
The loans under this program meet the size limitation of section 144(b)(1)(B). Further, it
represents that volume cap was allocated by the State for the Prior Bonds and that the
Current Borrowers were students who were residents of the State or attending
institutions of higher education within the State at the time the Authority made
Authority’s Original Loans. Thus, Authority’s Original Loans met the nexus test of
section 144(b)(3). Accordingly, Authority’s Original Loans are student loans made
under a program described in section 144(b)(1)(B).

The Refinancing Loans also will be made under a program of general application
approved by the State and not described in section 144(b)(1)(A). The amounts of the
Refinancing Loans will not exceed the respective Current Borrowers’ outstanding
principal amounts of Authority’s Original Loans plus any interest capitalized to or
accrued on the Authority’s Original Loans. The volume cap for the Bonds (as refunding
bonds for the Prior Issues) will be derived directly or indirectly from the State, the same
state as that from which the volume cap was derived for the Prior Bonds. The Current
Borrowers, at the time the Authority made Authority’s Original Loans, were students
who were residents of the State or attending institutions of higher education within the
State, and thus, the nexus test will be met with respect to the Refinancing Loans. As a
result, the Refinancing Loans also will be student loans made under a program
described in section 144(b)(1)(B).

CONCLUSION

The Refinancing Loans to be made with the proceeds of the Bonds will be student loans
made under a program described in section 144(b)(1)(B).

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied about the tax
consequences of any transaction or item discussed in this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

PLR-133996-13 5

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Sincerely,

Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions & Products)

/S/

By: ___
Johanna Som de Cerff
Senior Technician Reviewer
Branch 5

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.