IRA securities were timely rolled over based on actual distribution date
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An IRA custodian reported that two securities were distributed on September 12, but its own records showed that the actual distribution occurred on November 20. After difficulties retitling the certificates, the securities were deposited into another IRA on January 16. The IRS accepted the custodian’s documentation of the later distribution date and concluded that the taxpayer completed the rollover within 60 days. The securities were therefore treated as rollover contributions under IRC § 408(d)(3).
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Were the two IRA securities rolled over within 60 days of their actual distribution?
- Outcome: Approved, using November 20 as the actual distribution date
- Key authorities: IRC § 408(d)(3)
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
201446033
AUG 18 2014
Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00
SE:T:EP:RA:T1
Legend:
Taxpayer A =
IRA B =
Financial Institution C =
Company D =
Financial Institution F =
Financial Institution G =
Financial Institution H =
IRA I =
Security M =
Security N =
Amount 1 =
Amount 2 =
Amount 3 =
Dear Mr. :
This is in response to your request dated April 10, 2014, as supplemented by
correspondence dated May 1, and June 4, 2014, from your authorized
representative, in which you request that the Internal Revenue Service (“the
Service”) recognize that distributions of Amounts 1 and 2 from IRA B were properly
rolled over to a new IRA within the 60-day rollover requirement contained in
section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code ("Code").
2 201446033
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury
in support of the ruling requested:
Taxpayer A represents that distributions of Amount 1 and Amount 2 were made
from IRA B. The Form 1099-R for tax year 2013 reported a distribution date for
both amounts as September 12, 2013, which information was transmitted to the
Service. Taxpayer A asserts that his failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-
day period, beginning on the purported distribution date of September 12, 2013,
with respect to Amount 1 and Amount 2, was the result of errors made by
Financial Institution C in the process of retitling share certificates and defective
information reporting on the Form 1099-R.
Taxpayer A maintained IRA B with Financial Institution C. On June 28, 2013,
Financial Institution C notified Taxpayer A that it would no longer hold investments
in Company D within his IRA (IRA B). IRA B held two investments in Company D:
Security M shares with a total value of Amount 1 and Security N shares with a
total value of Amount 2. Taxpayer A received a notice from Financial Institution C
that if Financial Institution C did not receive instructions from Taxpayer A by
September 7, 2013, regarding the disposition of Securities M and N, Financial
Institution C would make a taxable distribution to Taxpayer A of all the Security M
and Security N shares themselves. On July 26, 2013, Taxpayer A completed an
account transfer form with Financial Institution F which authorized the direct
transfer of both Security M and Security N shares held by IRA B to a new IRA with
Financial Institution F which Taxpayer A intended to open. The transfer never
occurred because Financial Institution F could not accept the Security M and
Security N shares because the shares were not retitled in the name of the new
custodian, Financial Institution H, and, hence, could not be transferred by Financial
Institution C to Financial Institution H.
By letter dated September 26, 2013, Financial Institution C notified Taxpayer A that
Securities M and N with values of Amounts 1 and 2, respectively, were removed
from IRA B on September 12, 2013. By letter dated October 9, 2013, Taxpayer A
instructed Financial Institution C to retitle Securities M and N in the name of
Financial Institution H as custodian. This instruction was ignored. Taxpayer A
submitted a document, prepared by Financial Institution C, which showed the
actual distribution date of Securities M and N from IRA B was November 20, 2013.
On January 16, 2014, Securities M and N were deposited into IRA I at Financial
Institution G with Financial Institution H as the new custodian. On January 16,
2014, Financial Institution G posted the total of the Security M and Security N
shares at cost of Amount 3 (the sum of Amounts 1 and 2) and market value of
Amount 3.
The Form 1099-R which reported the distribution of Amounts 1 and 2 stated that
the distribution date was September 12, 2013. This is inconsistent with the
monthly statement prepared by Financial Institution C which indicated a distribution
date of November 20, 2013. Financial Institution C refused Taxpayer A’s request
3 201446033
that it correct Form 1099-R to show the actual distribution date was November 20,
2013, instead of September 12, 2013.
Based on the above facts and representations, you request that the Service
recognize that Taxpayer A satisfied the 60-day rollover requirement contained in
section 408(d)(3) of the Code with respect to the actual distributions of Amounts 1
and 2 from IRA B on November 20, 2013, rather than the purported distributions of
Amounts 1 and 2 on September 12, 2013.
Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in
section 408(d) of the Code, any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be
included in gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the
manner provided under section 72 of the Code.
Section 408(d)(3) of the Code provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does
not apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for
whose benefit the IRA is maintained if -
(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after
the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or
(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such
individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or
distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into
such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible in
gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3) of the Code).
Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) of the Code
does not apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) of the Code
received by an individual from an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending
on the day of such receipt such individual received any other amount described in
section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) of the Code from an IRA which was not includible in gross
income because of the application of section 408(d)(3) of
the Code.
Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for
partial rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section
408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section
408(a)(6).
The information presented and the documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is
consistent with his assertion that he accomplished timely rollovers of Amounts 1
4 201446033
and 2 into an IRA within the 60-day rollover period. In support of this claim,
Taxpayer A submitted a document prepared by Financial Institution C which
showed the actual distribution date of Securities M and N from IRA B was
November 20, 2013. In addition, Taxpayer A submitted proof that Securities M and
N were deposited into another IRA (IRA I) on January 16, 2014, within the 60-day
period following November 20, 2013.
Therefore, the Service concludes that Taxpayer A satisfied the 60-day requirement
for rollovers pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of the Code with respect to the
distribution of Security M and Security N with values of Amounts 1 and 2,
respectively, from IRA B on November 20, 2013. The contribution of Security M
and Security N, with values of Amounts 1 and 2, respectively, into IRA I on
January 16, 2014, are considered rollover contributions within the meaning
of section 408(d)(3) of the Code.
This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be
distributed by section 408(a)(6) of the Code.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which
may be applicable thereto.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of
the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
A copy of this letter ruling has been sent to your authorized representative
pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office.
If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact
(I.D. # ), , at ( ) .
Sincerely yours,
Carlton A. Watkins
Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.