Determination Letter 201446028 Released November 14, 2014 Denied Transcribed from scan

IRS denies exemption to residential construction company operating commercially

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A nonprofit residential construction company sought exemption under IRC § 501(c)(3). It performed most of its work for other nonprofits through competitive bidding, charged fees designed to cover wages and overhead, and also served private homeowners at market rates. The IRS concluded that these activities were indistinguishable from a commercial construction business and lacked the donative element required for charity. It therefore denied exemption because the company had a substantial nonexempt commercial purpose and failed the operational test.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does a residential construction company qualify for exemption when it competes for fee-based work and operates much like a commercial contractor?
  • Outcome: Denied
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(a) and 501(c)(3); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1; Rev. Ruls. 69-528 and 72-369

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Appeals Office

2525 Capitol Street, Suite 201 Employer Identification Number:
Fresno, CA 93721 .

Department of the Treasury

Person to Contact:

Number: 201446028 Employee ID Number:
Release Date: 11/14/2014 Tel:

Fax:

August 20, 2014
UIL: 504.50-00

Certified Mail

Dear

This is a final adverse determination regarding your exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code (the “Code”). It is determined that you do not qualify as exempt from Federal income tax
under section 501(c)(3) of the Code.

Our adverse determination was made for the following reason(s):

You failed to establish that you operate exclusively for one or more exempt purposes as required by
section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Additionally, you operate for a substantial, non-exempt, commercial
purpose of providing residential construction services.

Contributions to your organization are not deductible under section 170 of the Code.

You are required to file Federal income tax returns on Forms 1120. File your return with the appropriate
Internal Revenue Service Center per the instructions for the return. For further instructions, forms, and
information please visit www.irs.gov.

If you were a private foundation as of the effective date of the adverse determination, you are considered
to be taxable private foundation until you terminate your private foundation status under section 507 of
the Code. In addition to your income tax return, you must also continue to file Form 990-PF by the 15th
Day of the fifth month after the end of your annual accounting period.

Processing of income tax returns and assessments of any taxes due will not be delayed should a petition
for declaratory judgment be filed under section 7428 of the Code.

We will make this letter and the proposed adverse determination letter available for public inspection
under Code section 6110 after deleting certain identifying information. We have provided to you, in a
separate mailing, Notice 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose. Please review the Notice 437 and the
documents attached that show our proposed deletions. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, follow
the instructions in Notice 437.

If you decide to contest this determination, you may file an action for declaratory judgment under the
provisions of section 7428 of the Code in one of the following three venues: 1) United States Tax Court,
2) the United States Court of Federal Claims, or 3) the United States District Court for the District of
Columbia. A petition or complaint in one of these three courts must be filed within 90 days from the date
this determination letter was mailed to you. Please contact the clerk of the appropriate court for rules for
filing petitions for declaratory judgment. To secure a petition form from the United States Tax Court, write

to the United States Tax Court, 400 Second Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20217. See also Publication
892.

You also have the right to contact the office of the Taxpayer Advocate. Taxpayer Advocate assistance is
not a substitute for established IRS procedures, such as the formal appeals process. The Taxpayer
Advocate cannot reverse a legally correct tax determination, or extend the time fixed by law that you have
to file a petition in a United States Court. The Taxpayer Advocate can however, see that a tax matters
that may not have been resolved through normal channels get prompt and proper handling. If you want
Taxpayer Advocate assistance, please contact the Taxpayer Advocate for the IRS office that issued this
letter. You may call toll-free, 1-877-777-4778, for the Taxpayer Advocate or visit www.irs.gov/advocate
for more information.

If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown in
the heading of this letter.

Sincerely Yours,

Acting Appeals Team Manager

Enclosure: Publication 892 and/or 556

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES

DIVISION

Date: Aug 20, 2014 Contact Person:
Identification Number:
Contact Number:
FAX Number:

Employer Identification Number:

LEGEND:

P = state
R = date

UIL: 501.36-01

Dear :

We have considered your application for recognition of exemption from federal income
tax under Internal Revenue Code section 501(a). Based on the information provided,
we have concluded that you do not qualify for exemption under Code section 501(c)(3).
The basis for our conclusion is set forth below.

Issues

Do you fail to qualify for exemption from federal Income tax under section 501 (c)(3) of
the Internal Revenue Code due to the commercial nature of your activities? Yes, for the
reasons described below.

Do you fail to qualify for exemption from federal Income Tax under Section 501 (c)(3) of
the Internal Revenue Code as your activities constitute a substantial non-exempt
purpose? Yes, for the reasons described below.

Facts

You were incorporated in P on R. Your Articles of Incorporation state you are formed
for charitable purposes within the meaning of 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code
and to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized
under the non-profit corporation law of your state. You will provide affordable residential
construction services to the lower economic strata.

Letter 4036(CG) (11-2011)
Catalog Number 47630W

2

You refer to yourself as a non-profit residential construction company. You primarily
provide carpentry services, but also offer other construction related trades, including the
following:

framing
insulation
drywall installation and finish
painting(interior)
interior trim
window installation
door installation (interior/exterior)
flooring
cabinet manufacture and/or installation
hardware installation
siding
appliance installation
incidental shoring
pier and cement work
weatherization services
demolition and site cleanup
incidental landscaping
attic ventilation work
mechanical work
substantial concrete and foundation work
roofing
consulting services

You will contract primarily with other non-profits to provide construction services on pre-
approved projects for which they are requesting bids. If selected, you enter into a
contract with the organization and complete the work. You have bid for, accepted and
completed dozens of these types of jobs over the last one to two years, and routinely
bid for additional ones.

You estimate 90% of your work is dedicated towards these types of jobs. In describing
your marketing plan you state you are able to compete and undercut regular contractors
due to using a less experienced workforce, smaller infrastructure, no profit motive, and
paying lower compensation.

In describing criteria used to determine projects working with non-profits, many have
already been pre-qualified in terms of need. You further evaluate if the financial
resources from the non-profit are available, and since bids are placed, this often is not
an issue, as you are bidding the job to get the work and provide a service. You also

Letter 4036(CG) (11-2011)
Catalog Number 47630W

3

evaluate if you support the overall mission of the organization you will work with.

The remaining 10% of your work is done with private homeowners. These are small
jobs contracted privately to supplement income. You have listed criteria used in
evaluating potential clients of this nature, including economic status, resources, age or
disability, the type of work and if you have the resources to complete the job. You
indicated informal discussions were held with these clients about financing, with most
being elderly and/or minority. You provided a listing of these types of jobs that you have
completed to date. This list shows jobs included individuals with relations to members of
your board and staff, including a former colleague, a neighbor and an acquaintance.

Your long term goal is to build capacity and eventually be able to buy and rehabilitate
homes using financing obtained directly, rather than subcontracting work, as well as
build new homes.

You have paid employees performing services at prevailing rates. You subcontract out
some mechanical work, such as plumbing and electrical, that you either do not have the
license or expertise to complete sufficiently. Your labor rates equal the employee salary
plus a 50% markup for business overhead. There is a 10% project management markup
on material and subcontractor bids which has been waived on certain occasions. You
do provide some pro-bono and donated work. The majority of your income will come
from fees charged for your services, with the remainder expected from gifts, grants and
contributions.

Law

Section 501 (c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code provides for the exemption from federal
income tax of corporations organized and operated exclusively for charitable,
educational, and other purposes, provided that no part of the net earnings inure to the
benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

Section 1.501 (c)(3)-1 (a)(1) of the Regulations states that in order to be exempt as an
organization described in Section 501 (c)(3), an organization must be both organized
and operated exclusively for one or more of the purposes specified in such section. If an
organization fails to meet either the organizational or operational test, it is not exempt.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1): of the Regulations states an organization will be regarded as
“operated exclusively" for one or more exempt purposes only if it engages primarily in
activities which accomplish one or more of such exempt purposes specified in section
501 (c)(3). An organization will not be so regarded if more than an insubstantial part of
its activities is not in furtherance of an exempt purpose.

Rev. Rul. 69-528, 1969-2 C.B. 127 states that an organization formed to provide
investment services on a fee basis exclusively to organizations exempt from federal

Letter 4036(CG) (11-2011)
Catalog Number 47630W

4

income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Code is not exempt under 501(c)(3) of the
Code.

In Revenue Ruling 72-369, 1972-2 CB 245, an organization formed to provide
managerial and consulting services at cost to unrelated exempt organizations did not
qualify for exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. The ruling found that
providing managerial and consulting services on a regular basis for a fee was a trade or
business ordinarily carried on for profit. The fact that the services in this case were
provided at cost and solely for exempt organizations was not sufficient to characterize
the activity as charitable within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Furnishing
the services at cost lacks the donative element necessary to establish an activity as
charitable.

In Better Business Bureau of Washington D.C., Inc. v. United States, 326 U.S. 279

(1945), the Supreme Court held that the presence of a single non-exempt purpose, if
substantial in nature, will destroy the exemption regardless of the number or importance

of truly exempt purposes.

In B.S.W. Group, Inc. v. Commissioner, 70 T.C. 352 (1978), the Tax Court held that an

organization did not qualify for exemption under section 501 (c)(3) of the Code because
it was primarily engaged in an activity that was characteristic of a trade or business and
ordinarily carried on by for-profit commercial businesses. The Tax court Stated: We
must agree with the Commissioner that petitioner's activities constitutes the conduct of a
consulting business of the sort which is ordinarily carried on by commercial ventures
organized for profit.

In Airlie Foundation v. Commissioner, 283 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C., 2003), the court
relied on the “commerciality” doctrine in applying the operational test under section
501(c)(3). Because of the commercial manner in which the organization conducted its
activities, the court found that it was operated for a non-exempt commercial purpose,
rather than for a tax-exempt purpose. The case noted that among the major factors that
courts have considered in assessing commerciality are competition with for-profit
entities, pricing policies, the extent and degree of below cost services provided and the
reasonableness of financial reserves. Additional factors include whether the
organization uses commercial promotional methods (such as advertising) and the extent
to which the organization receives charitable donations.

Application of Law

You are not operated exclusively for charitable, educational, or religious purposes
consistent with Section 501(c)(3) of the Code nor Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a) of the Income
Tax Regulations and therefore fail to meet the operational test. Specifically, the facts
above indicate that you are not operated for exempt purposes but that you are operated
in a commercial manner. You charge fees that are not substantially below cost, but are

Letter 4036(CG) (11-2011)
Catalog Number 47630W

5

instead set to cover costs. Your expenses include overhead and employee
compensation, paying wages at prevailing rates. You offer services to private individuals
at market rates. Your jobs are secured through a competitive bid process alongside
other similar companies. As a result, your services are not distinguishable from any
commercial construction company.

You are not described in section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) of the regulations because you are
not primarily engaged in activities which accomplish one or more of such exempt
purposes specified in section 501(c)(3) of the Code. You are primarily engaged in a
business indistinguishable from a commercial operation.

Similar to the organizations denied exemption in Revenue Rulings 69-528 and 72-369,
you are operated similar to a trade or business ordinarily carried on for profit. Even
though you are serving mostly non-profit entities, furnishing services in the manner
described lacks the donative element to be considered charitable. You are involved in a
competitive bid process to win jobs, and charge fees that are substantially above cost.

As noted in B.S.W. Group and Airlie Foundation, operations which have a commercial
undertone are excluded from exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. You have
received little, if any, any contributions from private or public sources. Your primary
source of income is from fees for services received for subcontracted work. While you
intend on providing some services at a reduced price or free, this does not change the
commercial manner in which you operate. Your operations are distinguishable from
other for-profit construction companies only in that you charge slightly lower fees. You
conduct business with private individuals and derive income from those sources, price
your services accordingly, have a compensated staff, are in direct competition with
other for-profit companies and even note your ability to under bid them. These factors
are all indicative of commercial operations.

Since your operations are commercial in nature, they are distinguishable from an
exclusively charitable and educational program, which would be exempt in nature. This
underlying commercial motive is similar to what caused denial of exemption in Better
Business Bureau of Washington D.C.. Although elements of your proposed operations
are aimed at helping those in need through some volunteer and pro-bono work, your
substantial services are comparable to and are in direct competition with other local for-
profit construction firms. This precludes exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Code.

Conclusion

Based on the facts and information provided, you are not organized or operated
exclusively for exempt purposes. You fail the operational test, and you are operated for
substantial non-exempt commercial purposes.

Letter 4036(CG) (11-2011)
Catalog Number 47630W

6

Accordingly, you do not qualify for exemption as an organization described in section
501(c)(3) of the Code and you must file federal income tax returns. Contributions to you
are not deductible under section 170.

You have the right to file a protest if you believe this determination is incorrect. To
protest, you must submit a statement of your views and fully explain your reasoning.
You must submit the statement, signed by one of your officers, within 30 days from the
date of this letter. We will consider your statement and decide if the information affects
our determination. If your statement does not provide a basis to reconsider our
determination, we will forward your case to our Appeals Office. You can find more
information about the role of the Appeals Office in Publication 892, How to Appeal an
IRS Decision on Tax Exempt Status.

Types of information that should be included in your protest can be found on page 1 of
Publication 892, under the heading Filing a Protest. The statement of facts (item 4) must
be accompanied by the following declaration:

“Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this protest statement
including accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the
statement contains all relevant facts, and such facts are true, correct, and complete.”

The declaration must be signed by one of your officers or trustees with personal
knowledge of the facts.

Your protest will be considered incomplete without this statement.

If your representative submits a protest, a substitute declaration must be included
stating that the representative prepared the protest and accompanying documents; and
whether the representative knows personally that the statements of facts contained in
the protest and accompanying documents are true and correct.

An attorney, certified public accountant, or an individual enrolled to practice before the
Internal Revenue Service may represent you during the appeal process. If you want
representation during the appeal process, you must file a proper power of attorney,
Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, if you have not
already done so. You can find more information about representation in Publication
947, Practice Before the IRS and Power of Attorney. All forms and publications
mentioned in this letter can be found at www.irs.gov, Forms and Publications.

If you do not file a protest within 30 days, you will not be able to file a suit for declaratory
judgment in court because the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will consider the failure
to appeal as a failure to exhaust available administrative remedies. Code section
7428(b)(2) provides, in part, that a declaratory judgment or decree shall not be issued in

Letter 4036(CG) (11-2011)
Catalog Number 47630W

7

any proceeding unless the Tax Court, the United States Court of Federal Claims, or the
District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia determines that the
organization involved has exhausted all of the administrative remedies available to it
within the IRS.

If you do not intend to protest this determination, you do not need to take any further
action. If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will issue a final adverse
determination letter. That letter will provide information about filing tax returns and other
matters.

Please send your protest statement, Form 2848, and any supporting documents to the
applicable address:

Mail to: Deliver to:
Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service
EO Determinations Quality Assurance EO Determinations Quality Assurance
Room 7-008 550 Main Street, Room 7-008
P.O. Box 2508 Cincinnati, OH 45202

Cincinnati, OH 45201
You may fax your statement using the fax number shown in the heading of this letter. If
you fax your statement, please call the person identified in the heading of this letter to
confirm that he or she received your fax.

If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone
number are shown in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely,

Kenneth Corbin
Acting Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings And Agreements

Enclosure: Publication 892

Letter 4036 (CG) (11-2011)
Catalog Number 47630W

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.