Private Letter Ruling 201443002 Released October 24, 2014 Approved

Estate receives 120 days to elect out of automatic GST allocation

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer created a trust for a son and the son's children and reported the transfer on a timely gift-tax return. The taxpayer's return preparer did not attach the statement needed to elect out of the automatic allocation of generation-skipping transfer tax exemption. After the taxpayer's death, the estate requested additional time to make that election. The IRS found that the requirements for discretionary relief were satisfied and granted 120 days to elect out on a supplemental Form 709. A copy of the ruling must be attached to the supplemental return.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the estate receive additional time to elect out of the automatic allocation of GST exemption for the transfer to the trust?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2632(c)(5) and 2642(g); Treas. Reg. §§ 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii) and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201443002 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/24/2014 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2632.00-00, 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------------------- --------------------, ID No. -----------------
----------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------------- --------------------
Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------------- CC:PSI:B04
PLR-102714-14
RE: Date:
July 15, 2014

Legend

Taxpayer = ---------------------------------

Year = -------
Trust = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Firm = ---------------------------------------------------------------

Dear ----------------:

   This letter responds to a letter dated December 31, 2013, from the authorized

representative of Taxpayer’s estate requesting an extension of time under § 2642(g) of
the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations to make the election out of the automatic allocation of
generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax under § 2632(c)(5).

FACTS

   In Year, on a date after December 31, 2000, Taxpayer established and funded

Trust for the primary benefit of his son. Trust provides that the trustee of Trust shall
make such distributions of income and principal of Trust for the care of Taxpayer’s son
as the trustee shall determine in his sole discretion. Upon the death of Taxpayer’s son,
the trustee is to distribute the remaining principal equally to the children of Taxpayer’s
son.

    Taxpayer engaged Firm to prepare his Year Form 709, United States Gift (and

Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return. Taxpayer reported the Year transfer to
Trust as a gift on a timely filed Form 709. Taxpayer did not make the written election
out of the automatic allocation of GST exemption under § 2632(c)(5)(A)(i).
PLR-102714-14 2

  Taxpayer, through the personal representative of his estate, requests an

extension of time under § 301.9100-3 to make an election out of automatic GST
exemption with respect to the Year transfer to Trust pursuant to § 2632(c)(5)(A)(i).

LAW AND ANALYSIS

    Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer (GST). A GST

is defined under § 2611(a) as (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable termination, and
(3) a direct skip.

    Section 2602 provides that the amount of the GST tax is the taxable amount

multiplied by the “applicable rate.” Section 2641(a) defines the term “applicable rate” as
the product of the maximum Federal estate tax rate, and the inclusion ratio with respect
to the transfer.

   Section 2642(a)(1) provides that for purposes of chapter 13, the inclusion ratio

with respect to any property transferred in a GST is generally defined as the excess (if
any) of 1 over the “applicable fraction.” The term “applicable fraction,” as defined in
§ 2642(a)(2), is a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of the GST exemption
allocated to the trust (or to property transferred in a direct skip), and the denominator of
which is the value of the property transferred to the trust (or involved in the direct skip).

   Section 2631(a) provides that, for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio,

every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption amount which may be allocated by
such individual (or his executor) to any property with respect to which such individual is
the transferor. Section 2631(b) provides that any allocation under § 2631(a), once
made, shall be irrevocable.

   Section 2632(a)(1) provides that an individual’s GST exemption may be allocated

at any time on or before the date prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such
individual’s estate (determined with regard to extensions), regardless of whether such
return is required to be filed.

    Section 2632(c) is effective for transfers subject to chapter 11 or 12 made after

December 31, 2000. See Pub. L. No. 107-16, § 561(a). Section 2632(c)(1) provides
that if any individual makes an indirect skip during such individual’s lifetime, any unused
portion of such individual’s GST exemption shall be allocated to the property transferred
to the extent necessary to make the inclusion ratio for such property zero. If the amount
of the indirect skip exceeds such unused portion, the entire unused portion shall be
allocated to the property transferred.

   Section 2632(c)(3)(A) provides that for purposes of § 2632(c), the term “indirect

skip” means any transfer of property (other than a direct skip) subject to the tax imposed
PLR-102714-14 3

by chapter 12 made to a GST Trust. Section 2632(c)(3)(B) provides that the term “GST
trust” means a trust that could have a generation-skipping transfer with respect to the
transferor unless the trust is described in § 2632(c)(3)(B)(i) through (vi).

    Section 2632(c)(5)(A)(i)(I) provides that an individual may elect to have

§ 2632(c)(1) not apply to an indirect skip. Such an election shall be deemed to be
timely if made on a timely filed gift tax return for the calendar year in which the transfer
was made.

   Section 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii)(A)(2) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax

Regulations provides, in relevant part, that a transferor may prevent the automatic
allocation of GST exemption (elect out) with respect to one or more (or all) current-year
transfers made by the transferor to a specified trust or trusts.

    Section 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii)(B) provides that to elect out, the transferor must

attach an election out statement to a Form 709 filed within the time period provided in
§ 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii)(C). In general, the election out statement must identify the trust,
and specifically must provide that the transferor is electing out of the automatic
allocation of GST exemption with respect to the described transfer or transfers. Under
§ 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii)(C), to elect out, the Form 709 with the attached election out
statement must be filed on or before the due date for timely filing the Form 709 for the
calendar year in which: (1) for a transfer subject to § 2642(f), the ETIP closes; or (2) for
all other elections out, the first transfer to be covered by the election out was made.

   Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides, generally, that the Secretary shall by regulation

prescribe such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be
granted to make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and
an election under § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5).

   Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief, the

Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including evidence of intent
contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such other factors as the
Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to grant relief, the time
for making the allocation shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. See
Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189.

    Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a

reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in § 301.9100-2 and § 301.9100-3
to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months
except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code except
subtitles E, G, H, and I.

  Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant

an extension of time to make an election whose date is prescribed by a regulation (and
PLR-102714-14 4

not expressly provided by statute). In accordance with § 2642(b)(1)(B) and
Notice 2001-50, a taxpayer may seek an extension of time to make an allocation
described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5)
under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

   Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer

provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice
the interests of the government.

  Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted

reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax
professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

   Based on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that the

requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Therefore, Taxpayer is granted an
extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to elect out of the automatic
allocation rules with respect to the Year transfer to Trust.

   Taxpayer, through the personal representative of Taxpayer’s estate, should

make the allocation on a supplemental Form 709 for Year and file the form with the
Internal Revenue Service, Cincinnati Service Center – Stop 82, Cincinnati, Ohio 45999.
Attach a copy of this letter to the Form 709.

   Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of

the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and

representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.
PLR-102714-14 5

     In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this

letter is being sent to Taxpayer’s authorized representative.

                                               Sincerely,



                                               Leslie H. Finlow
                                               Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 4
                                               Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                               (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)

   Copy for § 6110 purposes
   Copy of this letter

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.