Medical hardship supports waiver for a late IRA rollover
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An elderly taxpayer withdrew funds from an IRA while she had serious medical conditions and was caring for a seriously ill spouse. She intended to keep the money in retirement savings but inadvertently deposited it into a non-IRA account. After receiving an IRS deficiency notice, she followed an IRS representative's directions to amend returns, take required minimum distributions, and move the remaining funds into an IRA. The IRS found that the couple's medical conditions and resulting stress impaired her ability to manage financial affairs during the original rollover period. It waived the 60-day deadline and treated the later IRA contribution as a rollover, excluding required minimum distributions from the relief.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the taxpayer receive a waiver of the 60-day deadline for an IRA rollover delayed by serious medical and caregiving hardships?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 408(a)(6) and 408(d)(3); Rev. Proc. 2003-16
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
201442069
JUL 21 2014
SE:T:EP:RA:T1
Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00
Legend:
Taxpayer A =
IRA B =
Financial Institution C =
Organization D =
IRA E =
Financial Institution F =
Account G =
Financial Institution H =
IRA I =
IRA J =
Financial Institution K =
Amount 1 =
Amount 2 =
Amount 3 =
201442069
Dear
This letter is in response to a request for a letter ruling dated March 12, 2014,
as supplemented by correspondences dated May 13, 27, and June 16, 18, 19
and 20, 2014, submitted on your behalf by your authorized representative, in
which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in
section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”).
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of
perjury in support of the ruling requested:
Taxpayer A represents that she received a distribution of Amount 1 from IRA B.
Taxpayer A asserts that her failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-day
period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) of the Code was due to the combined
effect of her and her husband’s medical conditions and related issues which
impaired her ability to manage her financial affairs. From Amount 1, Taxpayer A
has taken required minimum distributions pursuant to Code section 408(a)(6).
Taxpayer A further represents that the remainder of Amount 1 has not been used
for any other purpose.
Taxpayer A maintained IRA B, an individual retirement account (IRA) under
section 408(a) of the Code, with Financial Institution C. In 2009, Financial
Institution C was experiencing financial problems and was taken over by
Organization D. Eventually, Financial Institution C failed and was acquired by
Financial Institution F. Coinciding with this transaction, Taxpayer A’s account
balance in IRA B was transferred to IRA E with Financial Institution F. This
Financial Institution was located 46 miles from Taxpayer A’s home. Acting on the
combined concern over the financial security of Financial Institution F, its location
and her husband's failing health, Taxpayer A decided to transfer the funds in IRA
E to a financial institution closer to her home. In November of 2009, Taxpayer A
withdrew Amount 1 from IRA E and inadvertently deposited it into Account G, a
non-IRA account with Financial Institution H.
Taxpayer A received a Notice of Deficiency in 2011 related to Taxpayer A’s 2009
Form 1040 and the distribution from IRA B. Taxpayer A’s tax preparer spoke with
an IRS representative who indicated that a resolution would require amending
Taxpayer A’s 2009 and 2010 Forms 1040 to report required minimum
distributions (“RMDs”) for those years and that Amount 1 (less RMDs) be
transferred into an IRA with RMDs continuing for the future. Taxpayer A’s 1040s
were amended, RMDs were distributed and reported and Amount 2 was
transferred into IRA I with Financial Institution H on December 21, 2011.
On March 12, 2012, Amount 3, the account balance in IRA I less the RMD for the
2012 taxable year, was transferred to IRA J with Financial Institution K.
3 201442069
Taxpayer A intended for Amount 1 to remain in a retirement plan. At the time
of the distribution she was 86 years old and being treated for multiple serious
medical conditions. In addition, Taxpayer A was the sole caregiver of her
husband who suffered from a medical condition that impaired her mental
alertness. Taxpayer A represents that during the entire rollover period, Taxpayer
A experienced enormous stress resulting from these circumstances that affected
her ability to manage her financial affairs. As a result, Taxpayer A missed the
rollover deadline. The ruling request is accompanied by a letter from Taxpayer
A’s physician which describes the stress she was under and its impact on the
management of her financial affairs. In addition, Taxpayer A represented that
she acted on the advice of an IRS representative and believed that the matter
had been resolved when Amount 1 (minus RMDs) was transferred to an IRA in
2011.
Based on the above facts and representations, you request that the Internal
Revenue Service (“Service”) waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained
in section 408(d)(3) of the Code with respect to Amount 1
Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in
section 408(d) of the Code, any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be
included in gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the
manner provided under section 72 of the Code.
Section 408(d)(3) of the Code provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code
does not apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual
for whose benefit the IRA is maintained if -
(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after
the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or
(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such
individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or
distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into
such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible
in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3) of the Code).
Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) of the Code
does not apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) of the Code
received by an individual from an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period
ending on the day of such receipt such individual received any other amount
described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) of the Code from an IRA which was not
includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3) of the
Code.
4 201442069
Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period
for partial rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of
section 408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under
section 408(a)(6).
Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the
60-day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code
where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good
conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable
control of the individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that
occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section
408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.
Revenue Procedure 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that
in determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement
pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant
facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution;
(2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization,
incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error; (3) the
use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check,
whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution
occurred.
The information presented and the documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is
consistent with her assertion that her failure to accomplish a timely rollover of
Amount 1 was due to the combined effect of the medical conditions of herself
and her husband and the resulting stress which impaired her ability to manage
her financial affairs during the 60-day rollover period. Taxpayer A did attempt to
rectify the problem by following the directions of an IRS representative to amend
her 2009 and 2010 tax returns and move Amount 2 from Account G, a non-IRA
account, to IRA I.
Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of the Code, the Service hereby waives
the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount 1 from
IRA B. Provided all other requirements of section 408(d)(3) of the Code, except
the 60-day requirement, were met with respect to the contribution of Amount 2 to
IRA I on December 21, 2011, such contribution will be considered a rollover
contribution within the meaning of section 408(d)(3) of the Code.
This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be
distributed by section 408(a)(6) of the Code.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described
herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations
which may be applicable thereto.
201442069
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
A copy of this letter ruling has been sent to your authorized representative
pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office. If you wish to inquire about
this ruling, please contact (I.D. # ), , at ( ) .
Sincerely yours,
Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1
Enclosures:
Deleted Copy of this Letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose, Notice 437
CC:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.