Private Letter Ruling 201441006 Released October 10, 2014 Approved

Employee may revoke section 83(b) election within filing period

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An employee received restricted employer stock and filed a § 83(b) election covering all of the shares. Less than 30 days after the stock transfer, the employee asked the IRS for permission to revoke the election. IRS procedure generally permits revocation requests made by the original deadline for the election. Because the employee requested revocation within that 30-day period, the IRS granted consent.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the employee revoke a § 83(b) election before the 30-day election deadline expires?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 83(b); Treas. Reg. § 1.83-2(f); Rev. Proc. 2006-31

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201441006 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/10/2014 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 83.02-04
Person To Contact:
------------------------ ---------------------------
------------------------ Telephone Number:
---------------------------------- ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:TEGE:EB:EC
PLR-118264-14
Date:
July 08, 2014

Legend

Date 1 = ----------------------
x = ----------
Employer = --------------------------------------
Date 2 = ----------------------

Dear ---------------:

   This letter is in response to your request, dated April 8, 2014, in which you asked

for consent to revoke an election you made under § 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code). The facts, as represented, are as follows.

   On Date 1, you were granted an award of x shares of Employer common stock

by Employer. On Date 2, you filed an election under § 83(b) of the Code with the
Internal Revenue Service Center where you file your individual tax return. The § 83(b)
election referenced all x shares of the common stock received from Employer on Date

  1. On April 8, 2014, less than 30 days after Date 1, you sent a letter to this office
    requesting consent to revoke your § 83(b) election.

    Section 83 of the Code sets forth the rules for transfers of property in connection
    with the performance of services. Section 83(a) provides that the excess of the fair
    market value of the property transferred, at the time the property becomes substantially
    vested, over the amount (if any) paid for the property, shall be included as
    compensation in the service provider's gross income for the taxable year in which the
    property becomes substantially vested. Property is substantially vested when it is either
    transferable or no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.

    Section 83(b) of the Code and § 1.83-2(a) of the Income Tax Regulations permit
    the service provider to elect to include in gross income the excess (if any) of the fair
    market value of the property at the time of transfer over the amount (if any) paid for the
    property, as compensation for services. Under § 83(b)(2) of the Code, an election
    PLR-118264-14 2

made under § 83(b) must be made in accordance with the regulations thereunder and
must be filed with the Internal Revenue Service no later than 30 days after the date that
the property is transferred to the service provider.

   Section 83 of the Code and § 1.83-2(f) of the Income Tax Regulations provide

that an election under § 83(b) may not be revoked without the consent of the
Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service. Section 1.83-2(f) provides that consent
to revoke an election under § 83(b) will be granted only in a case where the transferee
is under a mistake of fact as to the underlying transaction and must be requested within
60 days of the date on which the mistake first became known to the person who made
the election. The Service has recognized the principle that an election made under the
Code or regulations may be revoked on or before the due date for making the election.
Section 2.08 of Rev. Proc. 2006-31, 2006-1 I.R.B. 32, provides that a request for
consent to revoke a § 83(b) election will generally be granted if the request is filed on or
before the due date for making that § 83(b) election.

   In the instant case, you filed your request to revoke your § 83(b) election within

the 30 day time period allowed under § 83(b) for making the election. Based solely on
the representations provided, and the information and documents submitted, consent to
revoke your § 83(b) election is granted.

   Except as specifically ruled above, no opinion is expressed as to the federal tax

consequences of the transaction described above under any other provision of the
Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed concerning other tax consequences of
section 83 and its applicability to the transaction described above.

   This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)

of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. A copy of this letter
should be attached to your income tax return for 2014.

                                              Sincerely,




                                              THOMAS D. SCHOLZ
                                              Senior Counsel
                                              Executive Compensation Branch
                                              Office of Division Counsel/Associate
                                              Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and
                                              Government Entities)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.