Private Letter Ruling 201441004 Released October 10, 2014 Approved

County duty-disability benefits are tax-free and excluded from FICA wages

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A county code paid disability benefits to eligible employees who suffered injury or sickness in the line of duty. Benefits under four plans were based on a percentage of prior compensation and were reduced by Social Security disability, workers' compensation, and earned income during disability. The IRS ruled that the amended county code was a statute in the nature of a workers' compensation act. Benefits paid under the plans were excluded from employees' gross income under § 104(a)(1) and from FICA wages under § 3121(a)(2)(A).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Are the county's line-of-duty disability benefits excluded from income and FICA wages?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 104(a)(1) and 3121(a)(2)(A); Treas. Reg. § 1.104-1(b); Rev. Rul. 80-44

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201441004
Release Date: 10/10/2014
Index Number: 104.02-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------------------- --------------------------, ID No. ----------------
--------------------------------------------------------- -------------------
---------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------- ----------------------
---------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:TEGE:EB:HW
PLR-107434-14
Date:
June 10, 2014

Legend

Taxpayer = -------------------------------------

County Code = -----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ordinance = -------------------------------------------------

Plan A = ---------------------------------------------------------------

Plan B = ----------------------------------

Plan C = ---------------------------------------

Plan D = ----------------------------------------------------------------

Dear -----------------:

This is in reply to a letter dated January 10, 2014, requesting rulings on behalf of
Taxpayer, concerning the federal income tax treatment under sections 104(a)(1) and
3121(a)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) of certain payments provided to
current and former employees of Taxpayer pursuant to County Code, as amended by
Ordinance.

Ordinance adopts certain changes to employee benefit arrangements under County
Code. County Code sets forth the disability benefits for eligible employees of Taxpayer
PLR-107434-14 2

who suffer personal injury or sickness in the line of duty. According to County Code,
these disability benefits are paid under the terms of Plan A, Plan B, Plan C or Plan D
and determined as a percentage of an eligible employee’s compensation before the
employee suffered personal injury or sickness in the line of duty. Line of duty is defined
to mean a disability or death resulting directly or indirectly, from an act occurring or a
thing done or a risk taken, which was required of the employee in the performance of
his or her duty. County Code further requires disability benefits to be reduced by the
amount of social security disability benefits, workers compensation benefits, and earned
income during disability.

Section 104(a)(1) of the Code excludes from gross income amounts that are received
by an employee under a workmen's compensation act or under a statute in the nature of
a workmen's compensation act that provides compensation to employees for personal
injuries or sickness incurred in the course of employment. Section 1.104-1(b) of the
Income Tax Regulations provides that the exclusion from income of amounts described
in section 104(a)(1) also applies to compensation which is paid under a workmen's
compensation act to the survivor or survivors of a deceased employee. This exclusion,
however, is not available and does not apply to a retirement pension or annuity to the
extent that it is determined by reference to the employee's age or length of service, or
the employee's prior contributions, even though the employee's retirement is
occasioned by an occupational injury or sickness.

In Rev. Rul. 80-44, 1980-1 C.B. 34, a statute in the nature of a workmen’s
compensation act provided for an allowance of the greater of (A) 60% of the individual’s
average final compensation, or (B) the amount to which the individual would be entitled
under the normal, years of service, retirement plan. The ruling concluded that the
benefits under the statute were excludable under section 104(a)(1) of the Code to the
extent that they did not exceed 60% of the final average compensation. Any excess
over 60% of final average compensation was attributable to length of service, and
therefore, not excludable from gross income.

Section 3121(a)(2)(A) of the Code excludes from the definition of “wages” for purposes
of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (“FICA”), any payment made to or on behalf
of an employee on account of sickness or accident disability, if received under a
worker’s compensation law.

Accordingly, based on the information submitted and representations made, and
authorities cited above, we conclude as follows:

(1) County Code, as amended by Ordinance, is a statute in the nature of a
workmen’s compensation act.
PLR-107434-14 3

(2) Disability benefits paid pursuant to County Code, as amended by Ordinance, and
in accordance with the terms of Plan A, Plan B, Plan C or Plan D are not
considered taxable income to the employee under section 104(a)(1) of the Code.
(3) Disability benefits paid pursuant to County Code, as amended by Ordinance, and
in accordance with the terms of Plan A, Plan B, Plan C or Plan D are excluded
from the definition of “wages” under section 3121(a)(2)(A) of the Code.

No opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal tax consequences under any
other provision of the Code or regulations other than those specifically stated above.

These rulings are directed only to the Taxpayer who requested them. Section 6110(k)
of the Code provides that they may not be used or cited as precedent.

                                    Sincerely,



                                    Harry Beker
                                    Chief, Health & Welfare Branch
                                    Office of Division Counsel/Associate Chief
                                    Counsel
                                    (Tax Exempt and Government Entities)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.