Private Letter Ruling 201440032 Released October 3, 2014 Approved Transcribed from scan

Former spouse gets rollover waiver after plan gave wrong deadline

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A former spouse received retirement plan distributions through a divorce settlement and intended to roll part of the money into an IRA. A plan representative gave her the wrong amount of time for completing the rollover. She deposited the money within the period she had been told but after the actual 60-day deadline, and represented that the funds had not been used for another purpose. The IRS waived the deadline and granted 60 days from the ruling to contribute the amount to a rollover IRA or another qualified plan.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the IRS waive the 60-day rollover deadline when the former spouse relied on incorrect advice from the plan?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 60 days to complete the rollover
  • Key authorities: IRC § 402(c)(3)(B); Treas. Reg. § 1.402(c)-2, Q&A-12; Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

201440032

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

JUL [illegible]1 2014

Uniform Issue List: 402.00-00

SE:T:EP:RA:T2




Legend:
Taxpayer = * * *
Financial Institution = * * *
Amount A = * * *
Amount B = * * *
Plan = * * *

Dear * * *:

This is in response to your request dated June 1, 2013, as supplemented by
correspondence dated October 7, 2013, October 8, 2013, March 3, 2014 and March 13,
2014, submitted on your behalf by your authorized representative in which you request
a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 402(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of
perjury in support of the ruling requested.

Taxpayer represents that she received distributions from Plan totaling Amount A.
Taxpayer asserts that her failure to accomplish a rollover of Amount B, a portion of
Amount A within the 60-day period prescribed by section 402(c)(3) of the Code was due
to Taxpayer's reliance upon incorrect advice provided by a representative of Plan.
Taxpayer further represents that Amount B has not been used for any other purpose.

Taxpayer's former husband is a participant in Plan. As a result of a divorce
settlement, Taxpayer was entitled to receive a distribution from Plan, which was made

on October 2, 2012, and October 3, 2012, totaling Amount A. Taxpayer represents that
she intended to complete a timely rollover of Amount B to an IRA with Financial
Institution. However, Taxpayer was misinformed by a representative of Plan about the
length of time that Taxpayer had to complete her rollover. Relying upon this advice,
Taxpayer deposited Amount B into an IRA with Financial Institution, within the length of
time conveyed to her by the Plan representative, but after her 60-day rollover period
expired.

Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal
Revenue Service (the “Service”) waive the 60 day rollover requirement contained in
section 402(c)(3) of the Code with respect to the distribution of Amount.

Section 7701(j)(1)(A) of the Code provides that Plan's trust shall be treated as a
trust described in section 401(a), and is exempt from taxation under section 501(a).

Section 7701(j)(1)(B) of the Code provides that any contribution to, or distribution
from the Plan's trust shall be treated in the same manner as contributions to or
distributions from a trust described in section 401(a).

Section 402(c) of the Code provides that if any portion of the balance to the credit
of an employee in a qualified trust is paid to the employee in an eligible rollover
distribution, and the distributee transfers any portion of the property received in such
distribution to an eligible retirement plan, then such distribution (to the extent
transferred) shall not be includible in gross income for the taxable year in which paid.
Section 402(c)(3)(A) states that such rollover must be accomplished within 60 days
following the day on which the distributee received the property. An IRA constitutes one
form of an eligible retirement plan.

Section 402(c)(4) of the Code provides that an eligible rollover distribution shall
not include any distribution to the extent such distribution is required under section
401(a)(9) (related to required minimum distributions).

Section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code provides, in relevant part, that the Secretary

may waive the 60-day requirement under section 402(c) where the failure to waive such
requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or
other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such
requirement. .

Section 1.402(c)-2, Q&A-12 provides that the eligible rollover distribution rules
also apply to distributions to a spousal distributee (such as a former spouse who is an
alternate payee under a qualified domestic relations order).

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, (January 27, 2003), provides that in
determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to
section 402(c)(3) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and
circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to

complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions
imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for
example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the
time elapsed since the distribution occurred.

The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer is
consistent with her assertion that her failure to accomplish a timely rollover was caused
Taxpayer's reliance upon incorrect advice provided by a representative of Plan.

Therefore, pursuant to section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code, the Service hereby
waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount B from
Plan. Taxpayer is granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of this ruling letter to
contribute Amount B into a Rollover IRA or another qualified plan. Provided all other
requirements of section 402(c)(3), except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect
to such contribution, the contribution will be considered a rollover contribution within the
meaning of section 402(c)(3).

This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be
distributed by section 401(a)(9) of the Code.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described
herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which
may be applicable thereto.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact * * * at ( * )

    • - * * *. Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T2.

Sincerely yours,

Jason E. Levine, Manager,
Employee Plans Technical Group 2

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

cc:




Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.