Private Letter Ruling 201440024 Released October 3, 2014 Approved Transcribed from scan

Dementia supports estate's IRA rollover waiver

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An IRA custodian closed a man's accounts and mailed distribution checks after giving notice, but vascular dementia left him unable to manage his finances or understand the transaction. His spouse unknowingly deposited the checks into a non-IRA account, and the distribution's nature was discovered only after his death. The IRS granted the estate's executor and sole beneficiary 60 days to roll the amount into an IRA in the decedent's name. The ruling cautioned that the rollover IRA would have no designated beneficiary for required-minimum-distribution purposes. It also assumed that state law authorized the executor's action.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the IRS waive the 60-day IRA rollover deadline when the decedent's dementia prevented him from managing his financial affairs?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to state-law authority and required-minimum-distribution rules
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a)(9), 408(a), and 408(d)(3); Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(9)-4; Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

201440024

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

JUL 09 2014

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00

SE:T:EP:RA:T1




Legend:

Decedent A = * * *
Taxpayer W = * * *
IRA B = * * *
Account C = * * *
Bank D = * * *
Bank E = * * *
Individual F = * * *
State G = * * *
Amount 1 = * * *

Dear * * *:

This is in response to a request dated January 14, 2013, as supplemented by
correspondence dated May 6,7,15, and June 9, 2014, submitted by your authorized
representative, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement
contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the ruling requested:

Decedent A was the owner of IRA B, maintained by Bank D. Decedent A received a
distribution totaling Amount 1 from IRA B. You assert that the failure to accomplish a
rollover of Amount 1 within the 60-day period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) of the
Code was due to Decedent A’s worsening medical condition that impaired his ability to
manage his financial affairs. You represent that Amount 1 has not been used for any
other purpose.

Decedent A maintained IRA B, an individual retirement account under section 408(a) of
the Code, with Bank D. In 2009, Decedent A’s mental capacity began failing and was
later diagnosed with vascular dementia. Decedent A began arguing and harassing the
employees of Bank D over the status of his accounts. In June 2010, Decedent A was
informed by the attorneys of Bank D that his accounts would be closed in 30 days and
all funds distributed. As a result of his mental capacity, Decedent A ignored this notice
and on July 13, 2010, checks totaling Amount 1 were distributed and mailed to
Decedent A. In August 2010, these checks were discovered by Taxpayer W, Decedent
A’s spouse who was not aware that the checks were IRA proceeds, and along with
other checks found, deposited into a non-IRA account with Bank E. As the results of
these and other transactions, on October 6, 2010, Individual F was named Conservator
of Decedent A’s affairs. Decedent A died on June 21, 2012. The nature of the
distributions was discovered in November 2012, when Taxpayer W received a
deficiency notice from the Internal Revenue Service (Service).

Documentation from his physician has been submitted that reveals that Decedent A was
suffering from a medical condition at the time of these transactions and was not capable
of making sound financial decisions or understanding the consequences of his actions.

Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Service waive the
60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount 1 from IRA B.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section
408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income
by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section
72 of the Code.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines and provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not
apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit
the IRA is maintained if:

(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the day on
which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not
later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received,
except that the maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the
portion of the amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without
regard to section 408(d)(3)).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not
apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from
an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such
individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA
which was not includible in gross income because of the application of section
408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial
rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section
408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day
requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure
to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual
subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001,
are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.

Revenue Procedure 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in
determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to
section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and
circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to
complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions
imposed by a foreign country or postal error; (3) the use of the amount distributed (for
example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the
time elapsed since the distribution occurred.

The information presented and the documentation submitted is consistent with your
assertion that Decedent A’s failure to accomplish a timely rollover of Amount 1 was
caused by Decedent A’s medical condition and deteriorating health which impaired his
ability to manage his financial affairs, which resulted in Amount 1 being deposited into a
non-IRA account.

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the
60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount 1 from IRA B.
You are granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of this ruling letter to contribute
Amount 1 into a Rollover IRA. Provided all other requirements of section 408(d)(3) of
the Code, except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such contribution,
Amount 1 will be considered a rollover contribution within the meaning of section
408(d)(3) of the Code.

However, it is noted that, to the extent that you, as executor and sole beneficiary of
Decedent A’s estate, name a beneficiary of the IRA, section 1.401(a)(9)-4, of the
Income Tax Regulations provides that a designated beneficiary must be a beneficiary
as of the date of death. The Service will not treat any beneficiary named by you, as
personal representative of Decedent A’s estate, as a designated beneficiary under
section 401(a)(9) of the Code. Thus, for purposes of section 401(a)(9), the rollover IRA
will have no designated beneficiary.

This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be distributed
by section 401(a)(9) of the Code.

Finally, the scope of the executor’s powers is a matter of state law. This ruling assumes
that your actions in contributing Amount 1 into an IRA set up in Decedent A’s name, are
in accordance with the laws of State G and pursuant to your authority as executor of the
estate.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be
applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative pursuant to a Power
of Attorney on file in this office.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact * * * (Identification
No. * * ) at * * . Please address all correspondence to
SE:T:EP:RA:T1.

Sincerely,

Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.