Existing tax matters partner controls the 2012 statute extension

Number
201438026
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Extension by Agreement
Code sections
§ 6229, § 6231
Ruling dated
August 25, 2014
Publicly released
September 19, 2014

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised that the partnership's tax matters partner for 2012 remained in that role under the regulations. Only that person could sign an agreement extending the limitations period for the 2012 partnership year. For another year, the person could be designated either as a partner authorized to extend the period or as the tax matters partner. Without one of those designations, the person could not extend the statute.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Who may sign an agreement extending the limitations period when proceeding without a current tax matters partner?
  • Outcome: Advice given. The existing 2012 tax matters partner alone could extend that year's statute.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6229 and 6231; Treas. Reg. §§ 301.6229(b)-1 and 301.6231(a)(7)-1

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2014082508282501 [Third Party Communication:

UILC: 6229.02-00
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]

Number: 201438026
Release Date: 9/19/2014
From:
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 8:28:26 AM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: Proceeding without TMP

The 2012 TMP remains the TMP under Treas. Reg. 301.6231(a)(7)-1(L) and only he can sign a statute extension for that year.

You can still solicit information from the TMP for the current year and he can be designated as a partner with authority to extend the statute as provided under Treas. Reg. 301.6229(b)-1(a)(1). He can also be designated as TMP for 2012. But if the partnership does neither, he cannot extend the statute.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace