Late accounting-period change application is treated as timely

Plain-English summary

A homeowners association filed Form 1128 after the deadline for requesting an accounting-period change under Revenue Procedure 2006-45. The IRS found that the association acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not prejudice the government. It therefore treated the late application as timely and gave the association 45 days to forward the application and ruling to the Cincinnati Service Center. The ruling granted only filing-deadline relief and did not decide whether the requested tax-year change was otherwise permitted. The letter describes October 31 as the requested year end near the beginning but April 30 in its conclusion, and it does not explain the discrepancy.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: May the homeowners association's late Form 1128 be treated as timely filed?
• Outcome: Approved. The application received filing-deadline relief.
• Key authorities: IRC § 442; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.442-1(b)(1), 301.9100-2, and 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2006-45

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201438007
[Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 9/19/2014
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 9100.09-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------
-------------, ID No. ----------------
------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number/Fax Number:
-------------------

---------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:4
PLR-118678-14
Date:
June 13, 2014

Legend:
TIN = ----------------
Year = ------

Dear --------------:

This is in reference to a Form 1128, Application to Adopt, Change, or Retain a Tax Year, that Taxpayer, a homeowners association, filed requesting to change its accounting period, for federal income tax purposes, from a taxable year ending December 31 to a taxable year ending October 31 effective October 31, Year. Taxpayer has requested that the Form 1128 be considered timely filed under the authority contained in § 301.9100-3 of the Regulations on Procedure and Administration.

Revenue Procedure 2006-45, 2006-45 C.B. 851, provides procedures for certain corporations to obtain automatic approval to change their annual accounting period under § 442 of the Internal Revenue Code. A corporation complying with all the applicable provisions of this revenue procedure has obtained the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service to change its annual accounting period. Section 7.02(2) of Rev. Proc. 2006-45 provides that a Form 1128 filed pursuant to the revenue procedure will be considered timely filed for purposes of § 1.442-1(b)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations only if it is filed on or before the time (including extensions) for filing the return for the short period required to effectuate the change.

The information furnished indicates that Taxpayer did not file its Form 1128 by the due date of the return for the short period required to effectuate the change. However, Taxpayer requested an extension of time to file its Form 1128 under § 301.9100-3 shortly after the required time.

Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2 (automatic extensions), such as this case, must be made under the rules of § 301.9100-3. Requests for relief
PLR-118678-14
2

subject to § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer establishes that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that Taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, Taxpayer has satisfied the requirements of the regulations for the granting of relief, and Taxpayer’s late filed Form 1128 requesting to change to April 30, effective April 30, Year, is considered timely filed. 1

Because a change in accounting period under Rev. Proc. 2006-45 is under the jurisdiction of the Director, Internal Revenue Service Center, where the taxpayer’s returns are filed, we are returning your application so that you may forward it along with a copy of this letter to the Director, Cincinnati Service Center, within 45 days of the date of this letter. Please answer “yes” to question 1 of Section A, of Part ll, if you qualify under Rev. Proc. 2006-45. Any further communication regarding this matter should be directed to the Service Center.

This ruling is based upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. However, as part of an examination process, the Service may verify the factual information, representations, and other data submitted.

This ruling addresses only the granting of § 301.9100-3 relief. We express no opinion regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the Code or regulations that may be applicable, or regarding the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the instant transaction. Specifically, we express no opinion as to whether the taxpayer is permitted under the Code and applicable regulations to change to the tax year requested in the Form 1128, or whether the change may be effectuate under Rev. Proc. 2006-45.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.

1
The taxpayer’s application for a change in accounting period may be processed under Rev. Proc. 2006-45 as timely filed.
PLR-118678-14
3

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Enclosed is a copy of the letter ruling showing the deletions proposed to be made when it is disclosed under § 6110.

Sincerely,

Donna Welsh
Senior Technician Reviewer
(Income Tax & Accounting)
Office of Chief Counsel

Enclosures