Dissolved TEFRA entities could not perform every procedural act
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advised that a TEFRA proceeding could continue despite dissolution of the partnership because the proceeding operated for the partners and did not depend on the entity's continued existence. Some acts instead required a successor, transferee, or successor tax matters partner, depending on state-law winding-up rules and the particular agreement. A dissolved entity serving as tax matters partner lost that status and could not extend the partners' assessment periods through Form 872-P.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: How did dissolution of a TEFRA partnership, tax matters partner, or partner entity affect authority to enter federal tax agreements?
- Outcome: Advice given, with answers varying by the procedural act and the signer's continuing authority.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 6224, 6231, and 6501; Treas. Reg. § 301.6231(a)(7)-1; Chef's Choice v. Commissioner, 95 T.C. 388 (1990)
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2014072108383101 [Third Party Communication:
UILC: 6224.00-00 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Number: 201431030
Release Date: 8/1/2014
From:
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 8:38:31 AM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: Need Legal Guidance on Whether a Dissolved TEFRA Entity, Dissolved TMP Entity, or
Dissolved Partner Entity Can Enter Into Legal Agreements for Federal Tax Purposes
1. No. A TEFRA proceeding is a class action of the partners for the year. The continuing existence of the TEFRA entity itself is irrelevant. Chef’s Choice v. Commissioner, 95 T.C. 388 (1990)
2. Yes. Assuming that the entity is not deemed to remain in existence under state law for winding up purposes beyond the two year period. You would need the successor in interest or transferee to sign.
3. Probably. The successor TMP might be able to ratify the AAR.
4. No. See #1. The continued existence of the TEFRA entity is irrelevant.
5. No. See #1. The TEFRA entity does not enter into the Form 872-P in any event. By signing the Form 872-P the TMP is extending the section 6501 statute of the partners as their agent. If the TMP is an entity that has dissolved, however, its dissolution terminates its status as TMP. Treas.
Reg. 301.6231(a)(7)-1(L)
6. See #2. The answer may change if the suspension is revoked.
7. Maybe. We would have to look at these on a case by case basis and whether the entity is a pass-through or the signing individual has transferee or flow through liability.
8. Maybe. See #7
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace