Inadvertent S corporation termination cured after missed ESBT elections
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS ruled that a corporation's S corporation election terminated when shares were transferred to two trusts that qualified as electing small business trusts but had not made the required ESBT elections. Because the failure was inadvertent and the corporation and its shareholders agreed to make any required adjustments, the IRS treated the corporation as continuing to be an S corporation. The two trusts were also treated as ESBTs from the transfer date, provided they filed returns consistent with that treatment. The ruling required the trustees to file the ESBT elections and any amended returns within 120 days.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Can an S corporation continue to be treated as an S corporation after two otherwise eligible trusts fail to make timely ESBT elections?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(e), 1362(d)(2), and 1362(f); Treas. Reg. § 1.1362-4(d)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201416004 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/18/2014 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Numbers: 1362.00-00, 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------- ----------------------, ID No. -----------------
-------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------------------- ---------------------
-------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B03
PLR-129797-13
Date:
December 12, 2013
LEGEND
X = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
Trust 1 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
Trust 2 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
State = -------------------
Date 1 = ----------------------
Date 2 = --------------------------
Date 3 = ---------------------------
Dear --------------:
This letter responds to a letter dated June 24, 2013, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted on behalf of X by X’s authorized representative, requesting
a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.
FACTS
X incorporated in State on Date 1, and elected to be an S corporation effective
Date 2. On Date 3, shares of X’s stock were transferred to Trust 1 and Trust 2. X
represents that Trust 1 and Trust 2 were each qualified to be an Electing Small
PLR-129797-13 2
Business Trust (ESBT), within the meaning of § 1361(e), however, no election was
made under § 1361(e)(3) to treat Trust 1 or Trust 2 as an ESBT. Consequently, Trust 1
and Trust 2 were ineligible shareholders, and, as a result, X’s S corporation election
terminated on Date 3.
X represents that the circumstances resulting in the termination of X’s S
corporation election were inadvertent and were not motivated by tax avoidance or
retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders have agreed to make any adjustments
consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation as may be required by the
Secretary with respect to the period specified by § 1362(f).
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to
any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is
in effect for such year.
Section 1361(b)(1)(B) provides that, for purposes of subchapter S, the term
“small business corporation” means a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible
corporation and which does not have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a
trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not
an individual.
Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(v) provides that for purposes of §1361(b)(1)(B), an ESBT
is a permissible shareholder.
Section 1361(e)(1)(A) provides that, except as provided in § 1361(e)(1)(B), the
term “electing small business trust” means any trust if (i) such trust does not have as a
beneficiary any person other than (I) an individual, (II) an estate, (III) an organization
described in § 170(c)(2)-(5), or (IV) an organization described in § 170(c)(1) which holds
a contingent interest in such trust and is not a potential current beneficiary, (ii) no
interest in such trust was acquired by purchase, and (iii) an election under § 1361(e)
applies to such trust.
Section 1361(e)(3) provides that an election under § 1361(e) shall be made by
the trustee. Any such election shall apply to the taxable year of the trust for which made
and subsequent taxable years of such trust unless revoked with the consent of the
Secretary.
Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be
terminated whenever (at any time on or after the 1st day of the 1st taxable year for which
the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business
corporation.
PLR-129797-13 3
Section 1362(f) provides, in relevant part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a)
by any corporation was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3); (2) the Secretary
determines that the circumstances resulting in the termination were inadvertent; (3) no
later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in
the termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for which the termination
occurred is a small business corporation; and (4) the corporation for which the
termination occurred, and each person who was a shareholder in the corporation at any
time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments
(consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be
required by the Secretary with respect to the period, then, notwithstanding the
circumstances resulting in the termination, the corporation will be treated as an S
corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.
Section 1.1362-4(d) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that the
Commissioner may require any adjustments that are appropriate. In general, the
adjustments should be consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S
corporation during the period specified by the Commissioner.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that
X’s S corporation was terminated on Date 3 when stock in X was transferred to Trust 1
and Trust 2 because Trust 1 and Trust 2 failed to timely file ESBT elections under
§ 1361(e)(3). We further conclude that the termination was inadvertent within the
meaning of § 1362(f). Pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as
continuing to be an S corporation on and after Date 3, unless X’s S corporation election
is otherwise terminated under § 1362(d). Moreover, Trust 1 and Trust 2 will each be
treated as an ESBT from Date 3, and thereafter, provided Trust 1 and Trust 2 file
income tax returns for this period consistent with ESBT treatment.
Accordingly, X’s shareholders must include in their income their pro rata share of
the separately stated and nonseparately computed items of X as provided in § 1366,
make any adjustments to basis as provided in § 1367, and take into account any
distributions made by X as provided by § 1368.
This ruling is contingent on each trustee of Trust 1 and Trust 2 filing an ESBT
election effective Date 3, with the appropriate service center. Each ESBT election and
any amended returns must be filed within 120 days following the date of this letter, and
a copy of this letter should be attached to such election and returns. If these conditions
are not met, this ruling is null and void.
Except as expressly provided herein, we express or imply no opinion concerning
the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced
in this letter. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion regarding whether X is
PLR-129797-13 4
otherwise eligible to be an S corporation or whether Trust 1 or Trust 2 is otherwise
eligible to be an ESBT.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a
copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.
Sincerely,
James A. Quinn
Senior Counsel, Branch 3
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2):
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.