Determination Letter 201415016 Released April 11, 2014 Approved Transcribed from scan

Excise tax waivers granted for unpaid pension contributions

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted waivers of the 100 percent excise tax under section 4971(b) for four plans' unpaid minimum required contributions for the plan year ending December 31, 2011. The company had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and represented that the bankruptcy prevented it from paying contributions incurred before the filing. The IRS found that imposing the excise tax would create substantial business hardship and would be adverse to plan participants as a whole. The company was expected to make the unpaid contributions after emerging from bankruptcy.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the section 4971(b) excise tax be waived for unpaid minimum required pension contributions?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 4971(b); ERISA § 3002(b)

Full text (IRS public release)

201415016

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

FEB 14 2014

Uniform Issue List: 4971.02-00






Legend:

Company = ****

Plan A = *******
*****

Plan B = *****
*****,
***** **
*******

Plan C = ***** **
**** ***
******

Plan D = **** ***
*****

Dear **:

This letter constitutes notice that pursuant to your request of August 12, 2013,
waivers of the 100% excise tax under section 4971(b) of the Internal Revenue
Code (“Code”) for Plan A, Plan B, Plan C, and Plan D arising from the unpaid
minimum required contributions for the plan year ending December 31, 2011
have been granted to the Company.

The waiver of the 100% excise tax has been granted in accordance with section
3002(b) of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).

201415016

The amount for which these excise tax waivers have been granted is equal to
100% of the contribution which would otherwise be required to satisfy the
minimum required contribution as of the end of each of the applicable plan years
for which a waiver is granted to the extent such deficiency has not been
corrected.

The Company has filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code, which does not allow for payment of debts incurred prior to the bankruptcy
filing. It submits that it could afford to make the contributions to the Plan A,
Plan B, Plan C, and Plan D, but was barred from doing so because it had filed for
bankruptcy. Upon emerging from bankruptcy, Company will make all required
unpaid minimum required contributions to Plan A, Plan B, Plan C, and Plan D.
The Company has shown through its submission of financial data that imposition
of the section 4971(b) excise tax would be a substantial business hardship and
would be adverse to plan participants as a whole.

This ruling letter is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Code section
6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

We have sent a copy of this letter to the Manager, EP Classification in Baltimore,
Maryland, and to the Manager, EP Compliance Unit in Chicago, Illinois.
Additionally, pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of
this letter ruling is being sent to your authorized representative. If you wish to
inquire about this ruling, please contact * * (I.D. *) at ()
-****. Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T2.

Sincerely,

William Hulteng, Manager
Employee Plans Technical

cc: ***
***
******

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.