Private Letter Ruling 201412010 Released March 21, 2014 Approved

IRS permits a retroactive qualified electing fund election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS consented to a taxpayer's retroactive qualified electing fund election for shares of a foreign corporation treated as a passive foreign investment company. The taxpayer's accountant knew about the investment but did not identify the company as a PFIC or advise about the QEF election. After the taxpayer learned of the PFIC status, the taxpayer provided affidavits describing the failure, discovery, and professional relationship, and represented that the IRS had not raised the issue on audit. The ruling matters because it shows how a taxpayer may obtain consent for a late QEF election when the regulatory conditions are satisfied.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayer make a retroactive QEF election under Treas. Reg. § 1.1295-3(f)?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1295(a), 1295(b); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1295-3(f), 1.1295-3(g)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201412010 [Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 3/21/2014 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 1295.02-02
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------- --------------------------, ID No. ----------------
------------------------ -----------------
------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:B02
PLR-135251-13
Date:
November 8, 2013

              TY: -------

Legend

Taxpayer: -------------------------------------
Company: --------------------------------
Country: ------------
State: --------------
Firm: --------------------------------------------
Advisor: ----------------------
Accountant: ------------------------
Business A: ----------
Year 1: -------
Year 2: -------
Year 3: -------
Year 4: -------
Year 5: -------
Year 6: -------
Year 7: -------
Year 8: -------
Year 13: -------
Date 1: ---------------------------
Date 2: ---------------------------
Month 1: -----------------------

Dear -------------------------------------:

This is in response to a letter dated August 7, 2013 submitted by your authorized
representative that requested the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue
Service (“Commissioner”) for Taxpayer to make a retroactive qualified electing fund
PLR-135251-13 2

(“QEF”) election under section 1295(b) of the Internal Revenue Code and Treas. Reg.
§1.1295-3(f) with respect to Shareholder’s investment in Company.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted on your behalf by your authorized representative, and accompanied by a
penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not
verified any of the material submitted in support of this request for ruling, such material
is subject to verification on examination. The information submitted in the request is
substantially as set forth below.

FACTS

Taxpayer is a United State citizen and resident who acquired shares of Company in
Year 2. Taxpayer acquired additional shares of Company in Year 3, Year 4, Year 5,
Year 6, and Year 7. At the end of Year 8, Company entered into a transaction, and all of
Taxpayer’s shares were sold on Date 1.

Company was formed in Year 1 under the laws of Country and is treated as a
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Taxpayer’s investment in Company
was handled by Advisor of Firm. Advisor did not receive any statements or tax
documents on behalf of Taxpayer with respect to the shares owned in Company and did
not provide any tax advice to Taxpayer.

Taxpayer relied on Accountant to prepare his U.S. tax returns for many years, including
the years in which Taxpayer owned shares in Company. Accountant is a reputable
accountant in the United States who has been preparing tax returns as a certified public
accountant in State for 19 years. The Taxpayer provided Accountant all relevant
information and documentation necessary to prepare Taxpayer’s tax returns and to
provide advice on U.S. tax matters. Accountant was aware of Taxpayer’s ownership of
shares in Company but failed to identify Company as a passive foreign investment
company (“PFIC”) within the meaning of section 1297(a) of the Code. As a result,
Accountant did not advise Taxpayer about the possibility of making, or the
consequences of failing to make, a QEF election with respect to Taxpayer’s shares in
Company.

Taxpayer was not aware that Company was a PFIC until Month 1 when Company was
about to enter into a transaction involving the sale of Taxpayer’s shares. As part of the
transaction, Company issued an Information Circular on Date 2 to all shareholders. The
Information Circular stated that Company believed it was a PFIC for Year 8 and all prior
years and provided information regarding the availability of a retroactive QEF election.
In Year 9, Taxpayer engaged a law firm to assist with filing a private letter ruling request
for a retroactive QEF election.

Taxpayer has submitted an affidavit, signed under penalties of perjury, that describes
the events that led to his failure to make a QEF election with respect to Company by
the election due date, including the role of Accounting Firm.
PLR-135251-13 3

Taxpayer also submitted an affidavit from Accountant, which describes Accountant’s
engagement and responsibilities.

Taxpayer represents that, as of the date of this request for ruling, the PFIC status of
Company has not been raised by the IRS on audit for any of the taxable years at issue.

RULING REQUESTED

Taxpayer requests the consent of the Commissioner to make a retroactive QEF election
with respect to Company for Year 1 under Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f).

LAW

Section 1295(a) provides that a PFIC will be treated as a QEF with respect to a
shareholder if (1) an election by the shareholder under section 1295(b) applies to the
PFIC for the taxable year; and (2) the PFIC complies with the requirements prescribed
by the Secretary for purposes of determining the ordinary earnings and net capital gains
of the company.

Under section 1295(b)(2), a QEF election may be made for a taxable year at any time
on or before the due date (determined with regard to extensions) for filing the return for
the taxable year. To the extent provided in regulations, the election may be made after
the due date if the shareholder failed to make an election by the due date because the
shareholder reasonably believed the company was not a PFIC.

Under Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f), a shareholder may request the consent of the
Commissioner to make a retroactive QEF election for a taxable year if:

   1. the shareholder reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, within the
      meaning of Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(2);
   2. granting consent will not prejudice the interests of the United States
      government, as provided in Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(3);
   3. the request is made before a representative of the Internal Revenue Service
      raises upon audit the PFIC status of the company for any taxable year of the
      shareholder; and
   4. the shareholder satisfies the procedural requirements of Treas. Reg. §1.1295-
      3(f)(4).

The procedural requirements include filing a request for consent to make a retroactive
election with, and submitting a user fee to, the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(International). Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(4)(i). Additionally, affidavits signed under
penalties of perjury must be submitted that describe:

   1. the events that led to the failure to make a QEF election by the election due
      date;

PLR-135251-13 4

   2. the discovery of the failure;
   3. the engagement and responsibilities of the qualified tax professional; and
   4. the extent to which the shareholder relied on the professional.

Treas. Reg. §§1.1295-3(f)(4)(ii) and (iii).

CONCLUSION

Based on the information submitted and representations made with Taxpayer’s ruling
request, we conclude that Taxpayer has satisfied Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f).
Accordingly, consent is granted to Taxpayer to make a retroactive QEF election with
respect to Company for Year 1, provided that Taxpayer complies with the rules under
Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(g) regarding the time and manner for making the retroactive
QEF election.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

This private letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section
6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter
ruling is being sent to your authorized representative.

A copy of this letter ruling must be attached to any federal income tax return to which it
is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this
requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control
number of the letter ruling

                                    Sincerely,



                                    Jeffery G. Mitchell
                                    Branch Chief, Branch 2
                                    (International)

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.