IRS consents to a regulated investment company's revocation of its taxable-year election
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS granted a regulated investment company's request to revoke its election under IRC § 4982(e)(4)(A) to use its taxable year instead of the one-year period ending October 31 when calculating required distributions. The fund said the election created administrative burdens and inconsistencies with other funds managed by the same investment manager, rather than providing a tax benefit. The IRS consented to the revocation for the specified year and later years, subject to a five-calendar-year restriction on making a new election. For the first year after revocation, the fund may calculate capital gain net income for the required distribution using the ten-month period from January 1 through October 31. The ruling also explains why the revocation does not change the treatment of specified gains, losses, or mark-to-market items from the prior year.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the fund revoke its election under IRC § 4982(e)(4)(A), and how should the first year after revocation be calculated?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 368(a)(1)(F), 4982(a), 4982(b), 4982(e), 4982(e)(4), 4982(e)(5), 4982(e)(6), 851(a), 1256, 1296
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201412008 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 3/21/2014 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 4982.06-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------------- --------------------------
----------------------- ID No. ------------------
-------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------ ----------------------
------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:FIP:B03
PLR-132686-13
Date:
December 17, 2013
Legend:
Fund = ------------------------
Trust = --------------------------------
State = ----------------------------------------------
Investment Manager = ---------------------------------------------
Date = --------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------
Year 4 = -------
Year 5 = -------
Dear ----------------:
This ruling responds to a letter dated July 15, 2013, submitted on behalf of Fund.
Fund requests consent to revoke a previous election made by Fund under section
4982(e)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), for Year 3 and subsequent
years.
PLR-132686-13 2
FACTS
Fund is a diversified series of Trust organized under the laws of State. Fund is
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a diversified open-ended
investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et
seq., as amended. Fund has made an election under section 851(a) to be treated as a
regulated investment Company (“RIC”) for federal income tax purposes under Subtitle
A, Chapter 1, Subchapter M of the Code. Fund’s overall method of accounting is an
accrual method and its taxable year is the calendar year.
On Date, Fund was reorganized into a series of Trust pursuant to a
reorganization within the meaning of section 368(a)(1)(F).
In Year 1, Fund elected under section 4982(e)(4)(A) to use the taxable year
ending on December 31 in lieu of the one-year period ending on October 31 for the
purposes of calculating the required distribution under sections 4982(b)(1) and (e) in
order to avoid payment of an excise tax under section 4982(a).
The election under section 4982(e)(4)(A) was made in an attempt to reduce the
complexity of tax accounting associated with calculating required distributions of
ordinary income, capital gain net income, foreign currency gains and losses, and gains
and losses pursuant to section 1296 under the excise tax and subchapter M provisions
of the Code. However, Fund’s experience has been that its section 4982(e)(4) election
created additional administrative burdens, primarily due to time constraints in declaring
required excise tax distributions. Furthermore, after the reorganization described
above, Fund’s investment manager was replaced with Investment Manager. Investment
Manager advises multiple RICs, and except for Fund, none of the RICs have made an
election under section 4982(e)(4), creating inconsistencies between the funds and in
turn, additional administrative burdens. Lastly, the promulgation of regulations
coordinating the excise tax and subchapter M provisions has greatly reduced the
administrative burden of having a tax year different from the period used for determining
Fund’s required distribution under section 4982.
Accordingly, Fund seeks consent to revoke its election to use the taxable year for
purposes of calculating Fund’s required distribution for purposes of sections 4982(b)
and 4982(e). Fund makes the following representations:
-
Fund’s desire to revoke its election is due to administrative and non-tax related
financial burdens caused by the election; -
Fund is not seeking to revoke its election in order to preserve or secure a tax
benefit;
PLR-132686-13 3
- Fund will neither benefit through hindsight, nor prejudice the interests of the
government if permitted to revoke its election; and -
Fund will not make a subsequent election under section 4982(e)(4)(A) for at least
five calendar years following the year of the grant of revocation.LAW AND ANALYSIS Section 4982(a) imposes an excise tax on every RIC for each calendar year,equal to 4 percent of the excess, if any, of the “required distribution” over the
“distributed amount” for the calendar year.Section 4982(b)(1) defines the term “required distribution” to mean, with respect
to any calendar year, the sum of (A) 98 percent of the RIC’s ordinary income for such
calendar year (as defined in section 4982(e)(1)), plus (B) 98.2 percent of its capital gain
net income for the one-year period ending on October 31 of such calendar year.Section 4982(e)(4)(A) provides that if the taxable year of a RIC ends with the
month of November or December, the RIC may elect to have its taxable year taken into
account in lieu of the one-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar year for
purposes of satisfying the required distribution defined in section 4982(b)(1)(B). Section
4982(e)(4)(B) provides that, once made, such election may be revoked only with the
consent of the Secretary.Section 4982(e)(5)(A) provides that any specified gain or specified loss which
would be properly taken into account for the portion of the calendar year after October
31 shall be treated as arising on January 1 of the following calendar year. Section
4982(e)(5)(B) defines “specified gain” and “specified loss” as ordinary gain or loss from
the sale, exchange, or other disposition of property (including the termination of a
position with respect to such property). The terms include any foreign currency gain or
loss attributable to a section 988 transaction and any amount includible in gross income
under section 1296(a)(1), in the case of gain, or allowable as a deduction under section
1296(a)(2), in the case of loss. Section 4982(e)(5)(C) provides that if a RIC makes an
election under section 4982(e)(4), the last day of the RIC’s taxable year will be
substituted for October 31.Section 4982(e)(6)(A) provides that, for the purposes of determining a RIC’s
ordinary income, each specified mark-to-market provision shall be applied as if such
RIC’s taxable year ended on October 31. Section 4982(e)(6)(A) also provides that in
the case of a RIC making an election under section 4982(e)(4), the preceding sentence
shall be applied by substituting the last day of the RIC’s taxable year for October 31.
Section 4982(e)(6)(B) defines “specified mark to market provision” as sections 1256 and
1296 and any other provision of the Code (or regulations thereunder) which treats
property as disposed of on the last day of the taxable year.
PLR-132686-13 4
Sections 4982(b)(1)(B) and 4982(e) provide that a RIC with a calendar year that
does not have a section 4982(e)(4)(a) election in effect will compute capital gain net
income for a one-year period ending on October 31. For a RIC that is revoking its
election under section 4982(e)(4)(A), there is a possible inference that, for the first year
following the revocation, such RIC’s calculation of its capital gain net income will include
the November-December period twice, once as part of the preceding calendar year and
then again as part of the one-year period calculation for the year of change. To clarify
that such a double inclusion is not required, Fund has requested that the calculation of
its required distribution with respect to capital gain net income be determined on the
basis of capital gain net income realized and recognized during the ten-month period
from January 1 through October 31 of Year 3.
Fund also requested that the same shortened tax year be applied for the
calculation of items of gain or loss described in sections 4982(e)(5) and (6). However,
due to the differing statutory language of sections 4982(e)(5) and (6) from that of
sections 4982(b)(1) and (e)(2), such an additional ruling is unnecessary. Unlike section
4982(e)(2)(A), sections 4982(e)(5) and (6) do not refer to a one-year period calculation.
Section 4982(e)(5)(A) provides that amounts that otherwise would be taken into
account for the portion of a calendar year after October 31 are treated as arising on
January 1 of the following year, effectively deferring inclusion of these amounts until the
subsequent year. Because Fund had a section 4982(e)(4)(A) election in place for Year
2, section 4982(e)(5)(A) and (C) would be applied to treat specified gains or losses,
which would be properly taken into account for the portion of the calendar year after
December 31, Year 2, as arising on January 1 of Year 3. In other words, for the years
that the section 4982(e)(4)(A) election was in place, there was no deferral of specified
gains or losses. And the Fund’s revocation of the section 4982(e)(4)(A) election will
have no effect on the calculation of the Year 3 section 4982(e)(5)(A) specified gains and
losses.
In addition, section 4982(e)(6)(A) states that each specified mark-to-market
provision shall be applied as if the company’s taxable year ended on October 31. It also
provides that in the case of a RIC making an election under section 4982(e)(4), the
preceding sentence shall be applied by substituting the last day of the RIC's taxable
year for October 31. Because Fund had a section 4982(e)(4)(A) election in place for
Year 2, section 4982(e)(6) would be applied to treat the specified mark-to-market
provisions as applying on December 31 of Year 2, and the revocation of the section
4982(e)(4)(A) election for Year 3 will not cause the Year 2 gains to be attributed to Year
3.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the information submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that Fund’s desire to revoke its election under section 4982(e)(4)(A) is
because of administrative burdens and not because of any federal tax-related financial
burden caused by the election. Fund does not seek to revoke its election for the
purpose of preserving or securing a federal tax benefit. Additionally, Fund will neither
benefit through hindsight nor prejudice the interests of the government as a result of
being permitted to revoke its election.
Accordingly, based on the representations made and pursuant to section
4982(e)(4)(B), the Secretary consents to the revocation of the election made by Fund
under section 4982(e)(4)(A), effective for calendar Year 3 and subsequent years. In
addition, in calculating the “required distribution” for calendar Year 3, for purposes of
sections 4982(b)(1) and (e)(2), the capital gain net income will be determined on the
basis of the capital gains and losses realized and recognized during the 10-month
period from January 1, Year 3 through October 31, Year 3.
As a condition to the Secretary’s consent to the revocation pursuant to section
4982(e)(4)(B), Fund may not make a subsequent election under section 4982(e)(4)(A)
for a period of five (5) calendar years following the year to which the grant of revocation
applies (i.e., Year 4 through Year 5, inclusive).
Except as specifically ruled upon above, no opinion is expressed or implied as to
any other federal excise or income tax consequences.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this
letter is being sent to your authorized representatives. It is important that a copy of this
letter be attached to the federal income and excise tax returns filed by Fund for the year
to which this ruling applies.
Sincerely,
__________________________________
K. Scott Brown
Branch Chief, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions and Products)
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.