Chief Counsel Advice 201411033 Released March 14, 2014 Advice

Section 6652 penalty follows nondeficiency procedures

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised on the proposed assessment of an IRC § 6652 penalty. The advice states that the IRS can assess a penalty not related to a tax without first issuing a statutory notice of deficiency. If the taxpayer disagrees with the proposal, the IRS sends a 30-day letter and the taxpayer may protest to Appeals. After assessment, the taxpayer generally must pay and then file a claim for credit or refund.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What procedures apply to an IRS proposal to assess an IRC § 6652 penalty?
  • Outcome: Advice given, the penalty follows nondeficiency procedures
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6652 and 6212; IRM §§ 20.1.1.4.2 and 20.1.4.1(1)(c); SEIU v. Comm., 125 T.C. 63 (2005)

Full text (IRS public release)

1

ID: CCA-726131-13
Office: -----------------------------
UILC: 6652.00-00
Number: 201411033
Release Date: 3/14/2014
From: ------------------
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 2:28 PM
To: -------------------
Cc: -----------------------------------------
Subject: GIK- § 6652(c)(1)(A) penalty proposal

 As requested, regarding the application against ------------------------ of the penalty proposed

by Exam:

 The IRS can assess penalties not related to a tax without providing a statutory notice of

deficiency (SNOD). IRM 20.1.4.1(1)(c)

 The § 6652 penalty is not subject to the deficiency procedures, which are used when

additional income, estate, or gift tax, and/or related penalties, are proposed (i.e., no SNOD is
necessary before the penalty may be assessed). IRM 20.1.1.4.2. An SNOD provides the taxpayer a
method of appealing a tax or penalty to the Tax Court before assessment. See § 6212.

 The § 6652 penalty is subject to the nondeficiency procedures. IRM 20.1.1.4.2.1. No SNOD is

issued, and the taxpayer can not petition the Tax Court. See SEIU v. Comm., 125 TC 63 (15 Sep
2005).

 If a penalty is proposed and the taxpayer agrees, the penalty is assessed. If the penalty is

proposed and the taxpayer disagrees, a 30-day letter is issued and the taxpayer may file a protest
with Appeals. If Appeals sustains the penalty proposal, the penalty is assessed. IRM 20.1.1.4.2(2).

 If the penalty is assessed and the taxpayer can not or does not file a protest with Appeals,

the taxpayer must pay the penalty and then file a claim for credit or refund. IRM 20.1.1.4.2(4).

 If a 30-day letter was not issued, or if the claim for refund is denied, the taxpayer is to be

given the opportunity for an appeal. IRM 20.1.1.4.2(5).

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.